Poll: Judge Roy Moore leads competitors in runoff

So, anyone here really think the accuser and Allred will allow hand writing and ink experts to examine it?


Doesn't really matter at this point. The revelation he was the Judge in her divorce and that his assistant signed her own initials (D.A) after his orders in that case pretty much wrap this thing up. That was one thing that always stood out to me because never in my life had I known a District Attorney to use D.A as a post-nominal. This explains it, and explains it in a way that pretty much proves Allred and the Accuser faked the Yearbook, and if they faked the Yearbook the story is false. Moore just won the election.

Irony is if Allred had ever actually practiced law in her life rather than just fronting an elaborate legalized bribery service she'd have known how fake that D.A thing looked.
 
No comment about Roy Moore: Sens. Tom Cotton, Mike Crapo, Deb Fischer and John Kennedy

Not withdrawing his endorsement of Moore: Sen. Rand Paul

Rand hasn't withdrawn his endorsement, but he also hasn't commented.

He certainly hasn't given any indication of continued support for Moore.

..mind you he's been away for over a week with broken ribs, just got back to town Monday.
 
Amazingly enough some 30 minutes after the presser no synopsis regarding forgery on Google. 2 minutes after the Allred presser there was a transcript and photos for 3 pages.
 
Rand hasn't withdrawn his endorsement, but he also hasn't commented.

He certainly hasn't given any indication of continued support for Moore.

..mind you he's been away for over a week with broken ribs, just got back to town Monday.

The "no comment" Senators never endorsed Moore.

I know Rand has bigger problems but he has tweeted about tax reform and he has yet to withdraw his endorsement, something I hope Moore remembers when he is in the Senate.
 
I am anxiously awaiting our usual contributors to make a "Libertarian Case For Not Allowing Judge Moore to Examine the Yearbook" thread.

NO NO NO, Moore signed it wrong in anticipation of needing to deny it silly, it will be proven authentic. :rolleyes:
 
Rand hasn't withdrawn his endorsement, but he also hasn't commented.

He certainly hasn't given any indication of continued support for Moore.

..mind you he's been away for over a week with broken ribs, just got back to town Monday.

At this point I don't think he should. There is nothing proven, all "he said/she said" driven by a WAPO article. If his assistant really did initial "DA", after his signature and they can attest to it or prove it, then the signature is a forgery. Done deal. If Moore wins he will remember Rand was the only one that didn't call for him to get out.
 
Last edited:
Neither are "my man." Brooks was the only good pick of the three, but obviously what he's selling isn't what Alabama is looking for.

If I were voting in that election, I'd sit it out. I have a particular dislike for hypocritical holier-than-thou types equaled only by my dislike for chickenhawks.

Fair, honest, and well-reasoned.

Personally, I would vote for Moore just to spite those rallied against him.

At this point, it would appear if he makes it, he will be indebted to a certain senator from Kentucky.
 
Doesn't really matter at this point. The revelation he was the Judge in her divorce and that his assistant signed her own initials (D.A) after his orders in that case pretty much wrap this thing up. That was one thing that always stood out to me because never in my life had I known a District Attorney to use D.A as a post-nominal. This explains it, and explains it in a way that pretty much proves Allred and the Accuser faked the Yearbook, and if they faked the Yearbook the story is false. Moore just won the election.

Irony is if Allred had ever actually practiced law in her life rather than just fronting an elaborate legalized bribery service she'd have known how fake that D.A thing looked.

It stood out because he was the ADA at the time. Not the DA.
 
The "no comment" Senators never endorsed Moore.

I know Rand has bigger problems but he has tweeted about tax reform and he has yet to withdraw his endorsement, something I hope Moore remembers when he is in the Senate.

I hope Rand takes whatever course of action is best for him politically, which will probably be an un-endorsement within the next day or two.
 
At this point I don't think he should. There is nothing proven, all "he said/she said" driven by a WAPO article. If his assistant really did initial "DA", after his signature and they can attest to it or prove it, then the signature is a forgery. Done deal. If Moore wins he will remember Rand was the only one that didn't call for him to get out.

If Moore wins, and is seated, he'll be an even bigger distraction than he would have been as a run-of-the-mill culture warrior.

I see nothing to be gained from continuing to support him.

It's more a question of how to minimize the damage (Rand should have never endorsed him in the first place).
 
I hope Rand takes whatever course of action is best for him politically, which will probably be an un-endorsement within the next day or two.

Ya, then he should pull his pants down, suck his thumb and walk home :rolleyes:

This is war, soldier. You're on the wrong side, thinking you are or pretending to be on the right side.

Roy Moore is pro-small government and against for a non-interventionist foreign policy. I'm not religious, but I could give a flying fuck about a religious display on Christmas. If that is your big position that you are so concerned about, then maybe you need to reconsider your priorities.
 
Back
Top