Poll: Judge Roy Moore leads competitors in runoff

Steve Bannon loves Roy Moore. Trump supports Moore whether he says so publicly or not, which means if Rand is smart he will support Moore too.

That simple fact that folks like Mitch McConnell hate Roy Moore and are threatening to expel him should he win, demonstrates how much they fear a Moore victory.

Moore was to be the first "Bannon Candidate"- Republicans who would challenge Trump. Bannon is trying to decide what to do- continue support or abandon him. For now, he is sticking with Moore. Trump supported Moore's opposition in the race.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/roy-moore-tests-the-limits-of-bannon/545948/

Roy Moore Tests the Limits of Bannon's 'Season of War'

The mounting charges against the Republican Senate candidate from Alabama are causing uncertainty for the Breitbart chief and his allies

Back in September, Roy Moore’s Republican senatorial primary win over Luther Strange seemed like a good early sign for Steve Bannon’s “season of war” against the Republican establishment. Bannon and his website Breitbart News had gone all-in on the Alabama race, flooding the zone with pro-Moore coverage, and Bannon had campaigned for him in person. And Moore emerged victorious even though President Trump endorsed his opponent.

Since then, things have gone very much awry. Five women have said Moore pursued them when they were teenagers and he was in his 30s; two of them, including one woman who said she was just 14 at the time, have said Moore sexually abused them; the National Republican Senatorial Committee has cut Moore off and its leader called for him to be expelled from the Senate even if he wins; nearly every Republican senator who endorsed Moore has withdrawn their endorsement; recent polls have shown him neck-and-neck with the Democratic candidate, Doug Jones; and on Tuesday night, the Republican National Committee pulled their support from him.

The cascade of revelations has forced Breitbart to double down when nearly everyone else is abandoning Moore, and is testing the kingmaker image Bannon has been trying to build for the 2018 midterms.

Bannon has remained publicly defiant, casting the allegations as a coordinated smear of Moore and sending two reporters to Alabama. But a Bannon ally confirmed to me that behind the scenes, Bannon has been sounding people out about how to handle the Moore situation. (This source and others quoted in this article spoke on condition of anonymity in order to speak freely about internal conversations.)

The Daily Beast reported on Tuesday that Bannon had told his inner circle he would “put [Moore] in a grave myself” if it turned out Moore had been lying to him about the accusations—Moore insists they are false—and had been “taking the temperature” of allies to see how they thought he should proceed. And internally, some in Bannon’s circle have expressed concern at the unrelenting nature of the scandal and indicated they’re more worried than they appear to be publicly, according to a source with knowledge of these conversations.

Another source close to Bannon pushed back on the Daily Beast report and said Bannon still “stands by Judge Moore 1000 percent” and plans to send more reporters to Alabama, adding that there’s “zero chance” Bannon and Breitbart will back down. Bannon is, this person said, scheduled to appear at a rally organized by Moore’s friend and adviser Dean Young on December 5. Bannon is in Japan this week giving a speech.

“There’s healthy debate about the whole thing, that’s the way Breitbart is on anything,” the source said, referring to internal conversations about the Moore story. “There’s not strong disagreement in any sense of the word.”

Bannon has compared the Moore allegations to the Access Hollywood tape that leaked a month before the presidential election, which showed Trump bragging to TV host Billy Bush about groping women and kissing them against their will. The tape caused a similar political firestorm, with many top Republicans pulling their support of the nominee. Trump did apologize for his comments but stayed mostly defiant; in a move orchestrated by Bannon, the campaign brought four women who had accused Bill Clinton of sexual misconduct to the debate that was held shortly after the story broke. Despite being abandoned by much of his party’s establishment, Trump won.

More at link.
 
He should have just followed the pilot formula.

Take you age, devide by two and add seven.

That's a good formula if you already have kids..

I'd say divide by two, then
if you have kids add 7
If you've been married but no kids add 5
If you've never been married, take the number of lifetime sexual partners, divide by 4, and add that number (max 7 after calculation)..
and always stay above the legal limit.
 
I was iffy on the yearbook. Forgery is possible - the message is rather odd - but it's hard to be 100% certain. Thomas Wictor tweets a lot of wish-fulfillment for Trump supporters.

However, this sounds much more convincing. If Moore can back up his claims with evidence, I'd say the yearbook woman has definitely made false accusations.

Two things made me question. The first was the "DA" when he was "ADA" at the time. The second was that after all that cursive writing it went into block lettering to name the place.
 
Has Trump's support for Strange already gone in the memory hole? If he deletes his tweets then it unhappens?
Trump doesn't have to delete his twitter now that he is president, the company does it for him pro actively because its their patriotic duty. I know I would delete Trumps twitter if I could, might stop a few wars from being started.
 
Yearbook thing looks super sketchy and the story doesn't add up. I say it's a forgery... which leads me to believe the rest of it is fake too.
 
Two things made me question. The first was the "DA" when he was "ADA" at the time. The second was that after all that cursive writing it went into block lettering to name the place.

From what I have read, it seems that she may have gotten the signature from her divorce papers where he ruled against her, and D.A. was the initials of his assistant at the time. :D
Also of note is the fact that she didn't file a Motion to Recuse on him during the divorce case if she was so torn up from the "brutal assault".
 
Moore was to be the first "Bannon Candidate"- Republicans who would challenge Trump. Bannon is trying to decide what to do- continue support or abandon him. For now, he is sticking with Moore. Trump supported Moore's opposition in the race.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/roy-moore-tests-the-limits-of-bannon/545948/



More at link.
I believe Trump is actually pulling for Moore, even though publicly endorsing his opponent.

That's why Bannon left the White House, to wage an ideological war against the swamp without having to swim in it day after day. Trump still has to govern, so he will go along to get along.

But I guarantee behind the scenes Trump is doing everything possible to help Moore win.

Watch his feet, not his mouth.
 
Aka The Billy Graham rule.

Camille Paglia thought a chaperone was a good idea and that women gave up a good deal of power when that tradition became antiquated. I tend to agree.

Elsewhere, I expect Moore to win easily (7% or more - no pun intended) and vote for the Constitution more so than anyone but Rand Paul.
 
I believe Trump is actually pulling for Moore, even though publicly endorsing his opponent.

That's why Bannon left the White House, to wage an ideological war against the swamp without having to swim in it day after day. Trump still has to govern, so he will go along to get along.

But I guarantee behind the scenes Trump is doing everything possible to help Moore win.

Watch his feet, not his mouth.

You guarantee it? Lol, what utter tripe. And I prefer watching his hands, its really bizarre the way he uses them when he talks.
 
According to WAPO there were 4 accusers. . . .

As far as Hannity he is an opportunist and he saw money dwindling away. So he blew which way the wind did.

NPR seemed proud to announce this morning that "3 more accusers have come forward, bringing the total to 8"

But it makes no sense that "voters will have to be the jurors that decide this" - they'll need evidence.
The Governor or an election commission should decide to delay a very Special Election in this case at least but I dunno.
 
NPR seemed proud to announce this morning that "3 more accusers have come forward, bringing the total to 8"

But it makes no sense that "voters will have to be the jurors that decide this" - they'll need evidence.
The Governor or an election commission should decide to delay a very Special Election in this case at least but I dunno.

Why delay it? that doesn't sound very constitutional. So in the future all you need to do to delay an election or disqualify a candidate is have people come out with murky accusations that arent' even of illegal actions and no proof? that doesn't sound like a good idea.
 
Report: Robocall Claiming to Be Washington Post Reporter Seeks ‘Damaging’ Information on Roy Moore

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017...eporter-seeks-damaging-information-roy-moore/

by JEFF POOR14 Nov 2017433
According to a report from Mobile, AL CBS affiliate WKRG, “at least one person” in their viewing area had received a robocall seeking “damaging information about Roy Moore.”

The robocall, captured in a voicemail recording by Creola, AL pastor Al Moore, is from a man claiming to be a Washington Post reporter by the name of “Bernie Bernstein” and offers a “reward” for “damaging remarks.”

“Hi, this is Bernie Bernstein, I’m a reporter for The Washington Post calling to find out if anyone at this address is a female between the ages of 54 to 57 years old willing to make damaging remarks about candidate Roy Moore for a reward of between $5,000 and $7,000. We will not be fully investigating these claims however we will make a written report. I can be reached by email at [email protected], thank you.”

Keep on trolling the trailer park with $100 bills.
 
I say this very carefully: As broadly as the rules seem to be defined, I think one would have a hard time finding a man anywhere who has not said or done something inappropriate with a woman at some point in his life. It seems to be the way men are hard wired. That doesn't make it right, but it also doesn't mean it's wrong in every case.

I don't blame you guys for being frustrated over it.
 
And just like that, it's Stuart Smalley who will end up saving Roy Moore.

 
Why delay it? that doesn't sound very constitutional. So in the future all you need to do to delay an election or disqualify a candidate is have people come out with murky accusations that arent' even of illegal actions and no proof? that doesn't sound like a good idea.

A special election to fill a Senate seat seems bad and costly in the first place - some states just have the Governor appoint the remaining term.

A delay, or better find a constitutional reason that no special election is even needed, would give a party the chance
to pull a candidate after a primary. Voters deciding this through the mucky waters doesn't sound fair either.

July 2016 when Comey announced that 7 emails were Top Secret with Hilly's going off the reservation I think
some people wondered how a candidate could be pulled by a political party after the primary season.

A state special election (for a federal office) could be a test of what to do maybe -
can a political party rescind a nomination after a primary in extending circumstances (?) I dunno.
 
A special election to fill a Senate seat seems bad and costly in the first place - some states just have the Governor appoint the remaining term.

A delay, or better find a constitutional reason that no special election is even needed, would give a party the chance
to pull a candidate after a primary. Voters deciding this through the mucky waters doesn't sound fair either.

July 2016 when Comey announced that 7 emails were Top Secret with Hilly's going off the reservation I think
some people wondered how a candidate could be pulled by a political party after the primary season.

A state special election (for a federal office) could be a test of what to do maybe -
can a political party rescind a nomination after a primary in extending circumstances (?) I dunno.

I'd sooner get rid of political parties than give them even more power to choose candidates.
 
I'd sooner get rid of political parties than give them even more power to choose candidates.

The political party went with the primary election winner as the candidate -
a re-primary seems better for GOP voters to make the decision - THAT won't happen.

The increasing number of woman coming forward with allegations is making them less credible and if all were true then
there are alot more people who knew about the conduct for a long time.

An "avalanche of woman" are coming forward (Hollywood / politics) . . .
that term made me think of Mittens Romney's "binders of woman" - lol
 
And just like that, it's Stuart Smalley who will end up saving Roy Moore.


I just that that story about Al Franken. It's a lot more recent than the Roy Moore allegations. This could get interesting. Let's see if the media tries to bury it.
 
Back
Top