PEACE, RPF, PEACE PLEASE

[enhanced_deficit]

I support treating Trump supporters the same was we do supporters of the others you mentioned. As you can see, that's not what's happening here.

So your answer to below question is "yes", if I'm reading your response correctly... granted "unanimous" will be flexible measure in such a stance.

"Do you support "belittling" of their supporters until this place becomes unanimously anti-Obama, anti-Cruz, anti-Rubio, anti-Hillary, anti-Sanders also?"

 

[erowe1]

Let's see, Trump maybe 50% chance we'll get a humble FP

The likelihood of anything at all about any of Trump's policies being humble is 0%, and it's lower odds than for any other candidate.

Admit it. The reason you support him is only about your views of race and nothing else.

 

[hankrichter12]

Can I keep that?

The likelihood of anything at all about any of Trump's policies being humble is 0%, and it's lower odds than for any other candidate.

Admit it. The reason you support him is only about your views of race and nothing else.

I'd admit anything at all if it was true. I don't deny my views on what I think the demographics of America should be, haven't once, but to suggest for a second they are my only concern, not even close. I actually have less faith in Trump with regards to the border than I do FP, but at least he's finally gotten the conversation in the public forum. The rest of your babble is not even worth replying to.

 

[HVACTech]

The questions we're discussing here aren't about how to shrink government, but whether to. I (along with Ron Paul and this website) am for shrinking, and you are for expanding it.

at least be honest Man. please?

you are NOT for "a limited state" your desire is for NO STATE at all.

 

[erowe1]

So your answer to below question is "yes", if I'm reading your response correctly... granted "unanimous" will be flexible measure in such a stance.

"Do you support "belittling" of their supporters until this place becomes unanimously anti-Obama, anti-Cruz, anti-Rubio, anti-Hillary, anti-Sanders also?"

Under current circumstances the answer is no. If we ever had a problem with them like we do now with Trump supporters, then under those circumstances it would be yes.

 

[erowe1]

at least be honest Man. please?

you are NOT for "a limited state" your desire is for NO STATE at all.

Of course I'm for no state. That's just what I said. At no point did I say or imply otherwise.

 

[Son_of_Liberty90]

what you are not aware of. is that we have lost most our good members and also the DP.

there is NOTHING good natured about the "warrior truth" until he finds the absolute purest form of anarchy.

That is unfortunate; then again, I just joined a month ago - I was only a lurker on thread topics not privy to RPF internal conflict.

 

[Smitty]

I'm tired of pickin' on the Trump people.

Hey!,...I know!

Let's go chase the Hare Krishnas out of the airport again!

 

[enhanced_deficit]

No justice, no peace!!!!

Kidding.

Time has come for Trump to receive Nobel Peace Prize.

 

[HVACTech]

Of course I'm for no state. That's just what I said. At no point did I say or imply otherwise.

like Ron Paul. I support restoring the original US constitution.
does that make me a "statist"? sir?

 

[ProBlue33]

what you are not aware of. is that we have lost most our good members

Where did they go, if they gave up on Ron/Rand/RPF ?

I know that some were so far to the left they had to go back to Bernie, but the true libertarians, where are they hanging out these days ?

 

[HVACTech]

That is unfortunate; then again, I just joined a month ago - I was only a lurker on thread topics not privy to RPF internal conflict.

it basically has to do with the meaning of the word "state"

as a bonafide HVAC/R tech. I do not find this word confusing. that is why I piss them off!

 

[Anti Federalist]

Just read through a big chunk of Lysander Spooner's No Treason

Lysander Spooner has definitely been me.

A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.

 

[Anti Federalist]

yes. since at least 2007. Ron Paul has been about "reclaiming" the Republic. and "restoring the CONstitution"

why would he do that.. if they were in effect toady or the cause of our problems?

clearly we have lost both. and Ron wants them back!

But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain:

That it has either authorized such a government as we have,

Or has been powerless to prevent it.

In either case, it is unfit to exist.

 

[Joeinmo]

The whole point of having neg-rep is to use it on posts like those that support tyranny.

the problem is you and anybody claiming Trump is for Tyranny have absolutely NO proof that it's true...I was one of the biggest haters of Trump, but when I see the entire establishment, talk radio, media, democrats, republicans etc., come out to stop this guy I know he is not a tyrannical man, he is trying to stop the United States from becoming extinct. I really don't see Ted Cruz who just hired Neil Bush, the guy using the same techniques the socialist use as the person I want. Trump is not an authoritarian anymore than Rand Paul is an isolationist. But hey if you want to be on the side of the Mitch McConnels and all the Oligarch's who flew to their private island to strategize on how to thwart the will of the people, then go ahead, it's still a free country for now.

 

[Anti Federalist]

like Ron Paul. I support restoring the original US constitution.
does that make me a "statist"? sir?

Short answer, yes.

 

[twomp]

To destroy ISIS genius. ISIS = neocon proxy army.

I've seen a lot of dumb posts by Trump supporters but I feel like this takes the cake. You should win "dumbass of the week" with this post. But there are a couple hours left so there could be some other Trump supporter on these forums who might take that title from you. NEWSFLASH!! Neocons want troops on the ground in Syria too. They have been clammoring for it for years now. Then they want troops in Sudan and Libya because those ISIS terrorists have to be dealt with! I hope you or your family gets sent there since you are all for it.

 

[erowe1]

the problem is you and anybody claiming Trump is for Tyranny have absolutely NO proof that it's true

We have his entire campaign from the day he started it until now.

he is trying to stop the United States from becoming extinct.

Given a choice between Trump being president and the US becoming extinct, I vote for the latter.

 

[erowe1]

I've seen a lot of dumb posts by Trump supporters but I feel like this takes the cake. You should win "dumbass of the week" with this post. But there are a couple hours left so there could be some other Trump supporter on these forums who might take that title from you. NEWSFLASH!! Neocons want troops on the ground in Syria too. They have been clammoring for it for years now. Then they want troops in Sudan and Libya because those ISIS terrorists have to be dealt with! I hope you or your family gets sent there since you are all for it.

+rep

 

[erowe1]

like Ron Paul.

Yes, like him.

I support restoring the original US constitution.
does that make me a "statist"? sir?

Of course it does. Just like Alexander Hamilton was a statist, and proud of it. What's confusing about that?