tangent4ronpaul
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 21,101
Well....
In light of new evidence and against what I would normally say was a bad price for this project I think the powers that be has now pushed me closer towards supporting this project than opposing it. Even if this pilot Roger or whatever his name is ends up making money on the deal as opposed to doing it for cost doesn't really matter now with this new information. The official campaign workers need to learn to let grassroots be grassroots even if they make poor decisions don't go ahead and disguise yourself as something your not? I feel bad now because that's exactly what I was telling Tangent not to do with the whole "At Cost" argument and here there are some in our circles that are doing the same thing with the justification of good intentions, you know what they say about the road to hell? It's paved with stones of them.
LOL this is sad I can't believe I'm having to type this, but yea I am all for grassroots supporting the campaign and getting Ron Paul elected through Phone Calls, Door to Door, Money Bombs, GOTV, etc. I participated in these in 2007 and try to get as many to support them now. But we cannot lose sight of our principles in the process.
And I understand we as grassroots sometimes ask as we did in 2007 for some leadership from the official campaign, but this is not the way to do it. I will make it a point to support any grassroots effort or project that is trying to be manipulated in one form or another through false personalities or lies regardless of where they come from. Ron Paul would never in a million years support the behavior that is being shown, political tactics aside when it comes to grassroots it's better to let grassroots be grassroots else be prepared to feel the whirlwind. Have these people still not understood the concept of blowback?
+rep