ronbot98734
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 8
A friend posted a link to this on his FB wall:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/fact-checker-fact-or-fiction/
Seriously? The numbers at the bottom show Paul with a *higher* (more of a liar) score than all 3 of the remaining opponents, and of course, none lower than the great BO himself.
Looking through a few of them, the score seems pretty arbitrary, Mitt flat out lies about something he said in the past and gets a 2, ron miscatagorizes "marines" as "troops" and gets 3.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/fact-checker-fact-or-fiction/
Seriously? The numbers at the bottom show Paul with a *higher* (more of a liar) score than all 3 of the remaining opponents, and of course, none lower than the great BO himself.
Looking through a few of them, the score seems pretty arbitrary, Mitt flat out lies about something he said in the past and gets a 2, ron miscatagorizes "marines" as "troops" and gets 3.