Anyone know where to find info on Baldwin's ballot access status?
Note how Dr. Paul never mentions Barr by name...using instead "Libertarian Party Candidate". Dr. Paul is dropping the hammer on Barr, yeah !!
Hopefully the LP doesn't take this out on RP.
...Bob Barr desires to continue the war on drugs.
Treating what is, at base, a moral, spiritual, and health problem as a matter of federal criminal law has solved nothing. The next president must put politics aside and take a long, hard look at the failure of the federal war on drugs. We must reestablish the primacy of individual choice and state's rights in deciding these issues.
So he flip flopped.
Do some of you actually step back and think about what you're saying? Those of you who are railing about some stupid political party, are doing the very same thing that we criticized the Republicans and Democrats for doing. Party loyalists!! Did you forget somewhere along the way, that we don't elect a damn political party to office; we elect an individual? For those who have, I'm not seeing how you are any different at all than the party faithful in the GOP.
I refuse to support Baldwin because he is a theocrat and like Bob Barr desires to continue the war on drugs.
Eh...too little too late. I do not believe Ron Paul wrote that release ...he uses too many ghost writers for my taste. He should have done that in the first place and Baldwin might have gotten on more ballots. I have to say...Bob Barr screwed up majorly...but for Ron Paul to endorse at this late date...seems moot. I won't vote for Baldwin or Barr..i am supporting Palin. In the defense of Baldwin though, if he runs for state representative I will gladly campaign for him. I really like the guy and I like that he's a true practicing Christian. I hope he will join the GOP and work with Ron Paul in the House to bring the GOP back to sanity. Tones
Well, buddy, I've been involved in the Libertarian Party for over 10 years.
The LP has been promoting a liberty agenda for 30+ years and will (hopefully) continue doing so indefinitely, Barr or no Barr.
Countless dollars and hours have been expended building up the "libertarian brand", running candidates at all levels of government promoting these ideas, and securing ballot access in spite of restrictive laws and regulations -- all in the name of maximal personal and economic freedom with a "big tent" welcoming approach.
The LP is FAR from perfect, but they have been and continue to be the best thing going in terms of putting libertarianism in the political arena.
The Constitution Party, on the other hand, it nothing but a thinly-veiled refuge for religious zealots, Theocrats, homophobes, "moral majority" extremists, and so forth... always has been and likely always will be, Baldwin or no Baldwin.
It's disheartening that Ron Paul is misleading his flock to follow this truly "fringe" and intolerant party just because Baldwin helped out his campaign and Barr "snubbed" his little press conference.
All of the above is of course opinion only but I don't think I'm alone in my disappointment over this. If only I could get my money back from Ron Paul.
Eh...too little too late. I do not believe Ron Paul wrote that release ...he uses too many ghost writers for my taste. He should have done that in the first place and Baldwin might have gotten on more ballots. I have to say...Bob Barr screwed up majorly...but for Ron Paul to endorse at this late date...seems moot. I won't vote for Baldwin or Barr..i am supporting McCain. In the defense of Baldwin though, if he runs for state representative I will gladly campaign for him. I really like the guy and I like that he's a true practicing Christian. I hope he will join the GOP and work with Ron Paul in the House to bring the GOP back to sanity. Tones