Paul has endorsed Baldwin

[Spider-Man]

Time to mobilize folks.

All of you sitting on the fence need to get involved with your Baldwin meetups now.

 

[EastWindRain]

Finally. What took so long? Just think about all the lost momentum. If only Ron Paul would have endorsed Chuck Baldwin 3 months ago, Chuck might have had a chance. But now there is so little time left to get Chuck elected.

 

[svf]

new devotees to the freedom philosophy are more likely to come from the left than from those conservatives who have been convinced that God has instructed us to militarize the Middle East.

errr... Ron can kiss any "left"-leaning supporters he once had goodbye now that he endorsed Pastor Baldwin.

 

[sratiug]

dugg!

 

[voytechs]

Does that mean NO to Barr's invite to be his veep bitch

 

[liberteebell]

Great. More voting controversy is just what we need right now.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I’ve thought about the unsolicited advice from the Libertarian Party candidate, and he has convinced me to reject my neutral stance in the November election. I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.

heh. I can't help but,

 

[Richie]

This sounded very un-Ron Paul like. It had to have been ghost written.

Never the less, this is AWESOME news for Dr. Baldwin's campaign and he will be receiving my vote.

 

[devil21]

That REALLY sucks. Especially considering Chuck's ballot access woes, homophobic writings, and the Constitution Party's theocratic, unlibertarian platform.

For the first time I regret voting for Ron Paul and donating hundreds of my hard-earned dollars to him.

Shiiiiiiiiiit.

I trust Ron Paul's choice since he has earned my respect as a straight talker with a record to back it up, unlike the Republicrat nominees. Baldwin it is. And he can be a write-in if he's not on the ballot.

http://www.baldwin08.com/

 

[123tim]

Ron Paul also tells you to jump off a cliff... therefore...?

Nah, I had been carefully considering jumping off a cliff for some time. I don't do anything without careful consideration. I've always been pretty much my own man.

Seriously, the same goes for Chuck Baldwin.

 

[LibertyEagle]

errr... Ron can kiss any "left"-leaning supporters he once had goodbye now that he endorsed Pastor Baldwin.

Well that's just a rather stupid statement. You and your friends don't care about liberty anymore? Neither Baldwin or Barr are going to win the Presidency. We're going to have to take back this country from the ground floor on up. If you give up on liberty, because he endorsed someone who doesn't stand a chance in hell of getting elected, then aren't you biting off your nose to spite your face?

 

[ItsTime]

Barr lost my vote, and was only getting it as a protest vote. I guess now I can vote for Baldwin as a protest vote.

 

[Lord Xar]

Ron Paul also tells you to jump off a cliff... therefore...?

No, but given Chuck Baldwin, who is a huge leap in the right direction over the self-absorbed and shill - B.Barr, then we are all good.

If "you" want to vote for Barr, go right ahead. Nobody is tell you not to. But I find it interesting you are trying to dissuade support for Baldwin. Why? Hmmmm.

 

[MGreen]

heh. I can't help but,

Same here. If that was directly from Ron Paul, Barr's decision must have really pissed him off. Though honestly, it feels more like Tom Woods.

 

[Flash]

I hated Barr since he stood up the press conference.

 

[Paulitical Correctness]

 

[RideTheDirt]

I support this decision, and I agree Chuck is the best candidate.
Baldwin 08 baby

 

[Danke]

homophobic writings

Link?

 

[MsDoodahs]

He was joking? He really didn't welcome me??

He welcomes you.

Ron knows that principled anarchists refuse to vote.

I am an UNprincipled anarchist and am voting this time, for only one candidate.

Ron Paul.

 

[Flash]

errr... Ron can kiss any "left"-leaning supporters he once had goodbye now that he endorsed Pastor Baldwin.

Ron Paul also tells you to jump off a cliff... therefore...?

Its called being an individual. If you don't want to vote for Baldwin, fine. It wont' matter anyways. Its not like they're going to win or even get into the debates. The protest vote is JUST a protest vote. Ron Paul has every right to say who he is voting for and endorsing.

If you really want to fight for liberty then do something that actually MATTERS like supporting Lawson or Conley. They have an actual chance at winning too.