Parent Arrested at Common Core Meeting for Speaking Against it (video)

Most people have been told since birth to "respeck the police", which means, do whatever they say. My parents told me this as well, but I'll be teaching my kids differently.

My son is taught that respect is earned and that to be respected is far more honorable than to be feared..

Respected and feared are not synonyms...;)
 
you may have just confirmed his supposition.

Am I daft? Because I still don't get it. Apparently I'm supposed to know what it means when people make random remarks about my state of mind without any indication as to what they're referencing.
 
Last edited:
Am I daft? Because I still don't get it. Apparently I'm supposed to know what it means when people make random remarks about my state of mind without any indication as to what they're referencing.

You said there was no police officer there, despite everything (including the charges brought against Mr Small) describing the security guy as a police officer. Originalist implied that you weren't connecting the dots, and further that it was just a temporary and unusual condition for you.
 
You said there was no police officer there, despite everything (including the charges brought against Mr Small) describing the security guy as a police officer. Originalist implied that you weren't connecting the dots, and further that it was just a temporary and unusual condition for you.

Don't get him riled up Gunny.
 
This is what pisses me off more than anything. I mean, thugs are gonna thug, it's their nature. But the mindless zombie sheep that just sit by bleating doing nothing while this brave man is carried off to face ten and a half years in prison, seriously, WTF happened to America? This ain't my America.
Ten and a half years in prison? Seems like the cop should have had the hell beat out of him if somebody is going to pay that kind of price.
 
Ten and a half years in prison? Seems like the cop should have had the hell beat out of him if somebody is going to pay that kind of price.

That would have been 1st Degree Assault on a Police Officer. 25 to life.
 
I'm just saying that I'm not going to come to someone's defense in a situation I'm not completey sure about. And, surely not over public school curriculum. Maybe, hopefully, someday at an abortion clinic.

Common core standards are starting in Math and English and will eventually be extended into the other parts of the curriculum.

Let’s consider It’s Perfectly Normal, a popular elementary-school sex ed text written by Robie Harris, a member of the Planned Parenthood Board of Advocates. The book is designed for 10 year-olds and contains material recommended by the Connecticut Department of Education for fourthgraders. Over fifty graphic colored illustrations of naked boys and girls are used to teach little children about various sexual practices and to assure them of the normality of homosexuality. The book shows children how to masturbate and how to engage with others in sexual activities, short of intercourse. It discusses contraceptives and illustrates how to put on a condom. It also lists nine reasons for having an abortion...

Are you okay with what is inside “It’s Perfectly Normal” for your child? Are you okay with your children being exposed to this type of book in school? Author Robie Harris has now updated Perfectly Normal for the 21st Century Learning. which means Common Core.

Please go to page 6 where it says, “The National Sexuality Education Standards were further informed by the work of the CDC’s Health Education Curriculum Analysis Tool(HECAT)3; existing state and international education standards that include sexual health content; the Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten – 12th Grade; and the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics, recently adopted by most states.”
http://archives.voicesempower.com/u...ndy-davis-planned-parenthood-and-common-core/

...Meanwhile, there’s a United Nations/UNESCO program called “Education For All” that involves the same ideas and the very same key people as “Common Core”. And there’s also an “Education, Public Awareness and Training” chapter in the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goals...

The “Education For All” developer is UNESCO, a branch of the United Nations. Education For All’s key document is called “The Dakar Framework for Action: Education For All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments.” Read the full text here: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001211/121147e.pdf

At this link, you can learn about how Education For All works:

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/educat...l/international-cooperation/high-level-group/

In a nutshell: “Prior to the reform of the global EFA coordination architecture in 2011-2012, the Education for All High-Level Group brought together high-level representatives from national governments, development agencies, UN agencies, civil society and the private sector. Its role was to generate political momentum and mobilize financial, technical and political support towards the achievement of the EFA goals and the education-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). From 2001-2011 the High-Level Group met annually.”...

But in the U.N.’s own words:

“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment. Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up…” See: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/...

On the linked Education and Awareness page of that same U.N. website, we learn:

“Education, Public Awareness and Training is the focus of Chapter 36 of Agenda 21. This is a cross-sectoral theme both relevant to the implementation of the whole of Agenda 21 and indispensable for achieving sustainable development.” http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/susdevtopics/sdt_educawar.shtml...

36.2 says they plan to “reorient” worldwide education toward sustainable development. (No discussion, no vote, no input needed on this reorientation plan, apparently.)

36.3 says: “While basic education provides the underpinning for any environmental and development education, the latter needs to be incorporated as an essential part of learning. Both formal and non-formal education are indispensable to changing people’s attitudes so that they have the capacity to assess and address their sustainable development concerns. It is also critical for achieving environmental and ethical awareness, values and attitudes, skills and behaviour consistent with sustainable development and for effective public participation in decision-making. To be effective, environment and development education should deal with the dynamics of both the physical/biological and socio-economic environment and human (which may include spiritual) development, should be integrated in all disciplines, and should employ formal and non-formal methods...

The stated objectives (36.4) include endorsing “Education for All,” achieving “environmental and development awareness in all sectors of society on a world-wide scale as soon as possible”; and to achieve the accessibility of environmental and development education, linked to social education, from primary school age through adulthood to all groups of people; and to promote integration of environment concepts, including demography, in all educational programmes, and “giving special emphasis to the further training of decision makers at all levels.”...

Under “Activities,” we find:

“Governments should strive to update or prepare strategies aimed at integrating environment and development as a cross-cutting issue into education at all levels within the next three years. This should be done in cooperation with all sectors of society…. A thorough review of curricula should be undertaken to ensure a multidisciplinary approach, with environment and development issues and their socio-cultural and demographic aspects and linkages.”...

ut the problem, in a nutshell, is simply: Whose version of “sustainable” do you want to re-educate everyone to believe –assuming that you can accept massive-scale propagandizing for the promotion of one single belief system, under which people didn’t get a representative vote)


* Sustainable thinking includes limiting by abortion the number of babies allowed to be born, in order to have control over population growth. The Chinese “One Child Policy” was introduced by the Chinese Government in 1979 with the intention of keeping the population within sustainable limits even in the face of natural disasters and poor harvests, and improving the quality of life for the Chinese population as a whole.Under the policy, parents who have more than one child may have their wages reduced and be denied some social services.” (BBC)

http://whatiscommoncore.wordpress.c...-s-education-mandate-push-common-core-in-usa/

Protesting at an abortion clinic is rather pointless if the next generation views each child as an environmental threat to the earth.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top