OMG - Just in from Pensacola - TRAGIC!

And now what?

Do you think you won't be able to do all those things again? Are we supposed to pretend this is some kind of permanent destruction of that beach like the people in that forum linked in the OP saying melodramatic things like, "Good bye, Ocean."?

It should be noted that particular forum is a tavistock psyop project. It is pretty much common knowledge at this point. I'd recommend considering anything said there or found there with healthy dose of skepticism.
 
Ixtoc/Campeche

An average of approximately ten thousand to thirty thousand barrels per day were discharged into the Gulf until it was finally capped on 23 March 1980, nearly 10 months later

How much is spewing at Macondo is unclear. BP first said 1000 bpd. Then it was 5000 bpd. Then maybe 50-70,000 bpd. Then their internal memo said possibly 100,000 bpd. Lets take 50,000 pbd. We're around day 60. That's 3,000,000 barrels so far. That's about half of Ixtoc, in two months.
 
Here's a somewhat encouraging article about Itox, but with the big difference being there were hardly any wetlands involved:

http://news.discovery.com/earth/gulf-oil-spill-ixtoc.html


Coastal Louisiana wetlands are termed “America’s Wetlands” because of their great environmental and societal value. They make up the seventh largest delta on Earth and are the heart of an intricate ecosystem some scientists say is on the verge of collapse. They contain over 40 percent of the U.S. tidal marshes and support the largest commercial fishery in the lower 48 states.

http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/releases/pr03_004.htm

That's just Louisiana! These wetlands have already been severely impacted by industry and pollution and Louisiana has been involved in coastal restoration:

http://www.wavcis.lsu.edu/news/wetland.htm

When oil kills the grasses in the marshes and barrier islands, they wash away. Now, I realize that some of you assholes might not care if that happens, but some of us do. It's a huge loss and not some easy fix as some would like to imagine it.
 
:rolleyes: Again, some of us "assholes" have been pointing out repeatedly that this wouldn't have even happened if government regulations and inducements had not pushed the oil companies into the deepwater over the shallow. But I guess you're too busy on your soapbox to listen to that.

Here's a somewhat encouraging article about Itox, but with the big difference being there were hardly any wetlands involved:

http://news.discovery.com/earth/gulf-oil-spill-ixtoc.html


Coastal Louisiana wetlands are termed “America’s Wetlands” because of their great environmental and societal value. They make up the seventh largest delta on Earth and are the heart of an intricate ecosystem some scientists say is on the verge of collapse. They contain over 40 percent of the U.S. tidal marshes and support the largest commercial fishery in the lower 48 states.

http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/releases/pr03_004.htm

That's just Louisiana! These wetlands have already been severely impacted by industry and pollution and Louisiana has been involved in coastal restoration:

http://www.wavcis.lsu.edu/news/wetland.htm

When oil kills the grasses in the marshes and barrier islands, they wash away. Now, I realize that some of you assholes might not care if that happens, but some of us do. It's a huge loss and not some easy fix as some would like to imagine it.
 
It should be noted that particular forum is a tavistock psyop project. It is pretty much common knowledge at this point. I'd recommend considering anything said there or found there with healthy dose of skepticism.

That's a rumor that's been around for a long time (which I have never seen substantiated). I also post at sites with the orginal GLP members. The guy who strated the site, Kent Steadman, continued to post at GLP untiel he died, a year or two ago. It's the best site for breaking news and in depth threads on the same. The threads on the Gulf have been outstanding, as many of the members live down there and have been reporting with pics and video.
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes: Again, some of us "assholes" have been pointing out repeatedly that this wouldn't have even happened if government regulations and inducements had not pushed the oil companies into the deepwater over the shallow. But I guess you're too busy on your soapbox to listen to that.

I'm fully aware of the collusion between government and corporations but I guess you've been too busy defending corporations (gov'ts partner) to read my threads on it.
 
I'm fully aware of the collusion between government and corporations but I guess you've been too busy defending corporations (gov'ts partner) to read my threads on it.

I'm not the one running around calling other people "assholes" sweetheart. You really need to take a chill pill. And this isn't just "collusion between government and corporations". It's collusion between government, corporations and ENVIRONMENTALISTS! Yes the same well meaning tree hugging save the whales folks have actually been an active part of the problem. I call all of them out. (Government, corporations and environazis). You (by your own admission) have only gone after 2 of the 3.
 
I'm not the one running around calling other people "assholes" sweetheart. You really need to take a chill pill. And this isn't just "collusion between government and corporations". It's collusion between government, corporations and ENVIRONMENTALISTS! Yes the same well meaning tree hugging save the whales folks have actually been an active part of the problem. I call all of them out. (Government, corporations and environazis). You (by your own admission) have only gone after 2 of the 3.

I've addressed the hijacked envorironmental movement, in more than one thread, along with the cap & trade agenda and the fact that BP helped to author C & T legislation. So, I admitted no such thing and you're full of shit.
 
So, I admitted no such thing and you're full of shit.

jmdrake full of shit? lol. He is one of the most thoughtful posters here.



The assholes on this board who have defended this bullshit as though this has something to do with these goons "freedom of speech" also need their asses kicked.

Go away.
 
jmdrake full of shit? lol. He is one of the most thoughtful posters here.





Go away.

He told a lie. He said I admitted that I have not posted about the fake environmental movement. I didn't admit anything of the sort because I have posted EXTENSIVELY about that very subject, as well as cap and trade fraud. I called him on a lie.

So, YOU go away.
 
I've seen that and I think it's BS. It looks like an oily steet at the beginning of a rain. There is no rain shown hitting a car or something else. I doubt it's possible to rain oil.

confirmed by friends of a friend in Louisiana
 
Didn't address the quote. Not surprising.

Yes, I did address it. He may be thoughtful but he told a lie. It was probably due the fact the fact that he hasn't read my posts, so he threw out something based upon an assumption, and it was not true. That's still a lie. I called him on it. It's as simple as that.
 
Oil does evaporate/dissapte into the air, somewhat, but I don't think it evaporates into clouds! If it did, it would probably have been raining oil in Houston for decades.
 
At what point do you consider being alarmed appropriate? Maybe if you lived there you would be alarmed, like people who bother to make these videos.

That oil can't just be shoveled up like snow, and nobody knows when it will stop coming, either. It's deep in the sand. I've posted other video of that in Destin. The hairbrained comments about how easy this is to clean up are just stupid beyond belief. The time to contain the oil is BEFORE it gets in the marshes and on shore, and that could have been and could be done. That doesn't meet the corporate-gov't objective, though. That won't help get cap & trade (which BP helped write and supports) passed. This is an environmental 9/11 and there are agendas behind the destruction.

Also, you unfeeling, sociopathic fuckers need your faces shoved in that oil. Maybe then you might get some empathy for the marine life. Then again, prolly not.

You are correct about one thing. This can indeed by analogied to an Environmental 9/11. Just like with 9/11, either elements of the government were sympathetic and allowed the lapse in the quality of the operations on the rig which led to the initial accident (Unlikely). Or more likely there was a specific effort to thwart quality efforts and direct action by actions of our government to blow the well (More Likely). There were gov. inspectors on the rig hours before it blew, the rig won an award for saftey by Obama's admins, and employees on the rig heard their managers yelling, over the phone, back at BP Execs saying "we cant do that, that's crazy."

Either way, just like with 9/11, there was criminality here, executed by a few, directed by a few more powerful, in order to carry out an agenda.

I say this to also say, this again means that the direction of our anger should not be focused on corporations or the existence of business, but at those criminal elements in our goverment/corporate alliance that actively caused this. Yes accidents happen in the course of business, because business is run by humans. But this was criminality that needs to be investigated.

Too bad the investigators are also the instigators.

It is to they you should direct your comments of "sociopathic fuckers" and it is they who should have their faces in the oil. Unfortunately this will not happen, but they will get their come-uppance one day, either in this life or the next, or both.

The liberty minded individuals in this forum are not your enemies. And the lack of emotion yet demonstration of stern attention and calm contemplation does not denote the lack of care or concern over the situation.

Becoming either panicked or frantically impassioned about any issue helps in neither case.
 
Back
Top