No. And if I had entered the country illegally, I would give the same answer.
My view of due process is that if you want to punish me for entering the country illegally, you first have to prove I did that. It's not up to me to prove that I didn't as a prerequisite for exercising my rights as a person who is innocent of that crime.
And if it were up to me to prove that I didn't enter the country illegally, so as not to be punished for entering the country illegally, then logically it would have to be required for all of us to provide that preemptive proof, not just the guilty people.
Do you have a different view of due process than that?
Do you think that we are all obligated to prove that they never entered the county illegally in order not to be punished for doing so (e.g. by being prohibited from exercising our right to keep and bear arms)?