Ender
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 12,527
Neither was Martin justified in throwing the punch that took Zimmerman to the ground on the way back to his vehicle.
There is no proof of this.
Neither was Martin justified in throwing the punch that took Zimmerman to the ground on the way back to his vehicle.
I don't want cops or cowards like u in my neighborhood
There is no proof of this.
As a NW he was only justified in Observing and Reporting; that was his job and nothing more; he was NOT justified in following Martin- the cops were on their way and he knew it.
He could have also temporarily got one arm loose and down to his hip or holster or wherever the gun was on his body. I could see that.
I don't want cops or cowards like u in my neighborhood
The burdon of proof is on the prosecution.
There is no proof he was not on his way back to the car as advised.
As a NW he was only justified in Observing and Reporting; that was his job and nothing more; he was NOT justified in following Martin- the cops were on their way and he knew it.
We are lacking physical evidence for a gap in time-
Except Trayvon was sitting on top of where Zimmerman's gun was according to Zimmerman.
I'm guessing Zimmerman had limited range and could bend at the elbow, and got an arm semi-free enough to grab his gun but didn't feel that he had enough leverage to physically remove him.
thanks dannno. sanity after some insane responses..Sigh... There are 98 year old women involved in neighborhood watch. Can you imagine if the policy of neighborhood watch was to follow suspicious persons??
Members of NW are individuals who also have rights, they aren't bound to NW policy.
So therefore, according to "innocent until proven guilty", wouldn't we need evidence of what happened during that time in order to convict Zimmerman?
I'm guessing Zimmerman had limited range and could bend at the elbow, and got an arm semi-free enough to grab his gun but didn't feel that he had enough leverage to physically remove him.
Self defense is an affirmative defense, it's Zimmerman who has to demonstrate that he was actin in self defense.
The burden of proof that is on the prosecution is the proof that Zimmerman indeed killed Trayvon Martin.
The gun that Trayvon was sitting on......without getting Trayvon off first....and with this "limited range" you say he had....nope. Not possible.
People really don't know how u can draw a weapon while being attack? Really?
The gun that Trayvon was sitting on......without getting Trayvon off first....and with this "limited range" you say he had....nope. Not possible.
Did he state that at no time did he have access to his gun? He obviously did at some point. What does the report state about that?
Right. He obviously had his gun at some point. But from the description he gave of where he and Trayvon were positioned immediately prior to the shooting it's not obvious how he got to his gun without getting Trayvon off him first. And if he got Trayvon off of him before he shot him......
Whoa, so Trayvon was ass backwards? It all makes sense nowI never said that and you know it. I said I don't see how Zimmerma an got to his gun with Trayvon having his knees on Zimmeran's legs and his butt on top of where Zimmerman said his gun was.
Whoa, so Trayvon was ass backwards?