Official Thread: 2020 Vote Fraud

[Brian4Liberty]

The same guy did a video piece for The New York Times a couple of years ago demonstrating that voting software can be deliberately exploited.

I Hacked an Election. So Can the Russians.​

Of course, the context is that "Russians" would be the exploiters - but if the "Russians" could pull it off, then surely any interested "domestic" parties with much more direct access would have an even easier time of it ...

Yeah. He’s not partisan at all.

Maybe he can tell us the details on how Scorecard changes votes, and which “glitches” are exploited.

 

[dannno]

why bother tampering with paper when you can just do that?

Because it isn't just one person committing fraud.

You have a candidate, who, for 5 years, the media convinced one side was "literally" Hitler. Would election fraud be justified if you were trying to prevent Hitler from coming to power?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

In sharp contrast to the above, The New York Times was singing a much different tune in 2012 (bold emphasis added):

Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/...il-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html
Adam Liptak (06 October 2012)

[...]

Election experts say the challenges created by mailed ballots could well affect outcomes this fall and beyond. If the contests next month are close enough to be within what election lawyers call the margin of litigation, the grounds on which they will be fought will not be hanging chads but ballots cast away from the voting booth.

[...]

The trend will probably result in more uncounted votes, and it increases the potential for fraud. While fraud in voting by mail is far less common than innocent errors, it is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say.

[...]

Voting by mail is now common enough and problematic enough that election experts say there have been multiple elections in which no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner. The list includes the 2000 presidential election, in which problems with absentee ballots in Florida were a little-noticed footnote to other issues.

[...]

There is a bipartisan consensus that voting by mail, whatever its impact, is more easily abused than other forms. In a 2005 report signed by President Jimmy Carter and James A. Baker III, who served as secretary of state under the first President George Bush, the Commission on Federal Election Reform concluded, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”

On the most basic level, absentee voting replaces the oversight that exists at polling places with something akin to an honor system.

“Absentee voting is to voting in person,” Judge Richard A. Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has written, “as a take-home exam is to a proctored one.”

[...]

Fraud Easier Via Mail

Election administrators have a shorthand name for a central weakness of voting by mail. They call it granny farming.

“The problem,” said Murray A. Greenberg, a former county attorney in Miami, “is really with the collection of absentee ballots at the senior citizen centers.” In Florida, people affiliated with political campaigns “help people vote absentee,” he said. “And help is in quotation marks.”

Voters in nursing homes can be subjected to subtle pressure, outright intimidation or fraud. The secrecy of their voting is easily compromised. And their ballots can be intercepted both coming and going.

The problem is not limited to the elderly, of course. Absentee ballots also make it much easier to buy and sell votes. In recent years, courts have invalidated mayoral elections in Illinois and Indiana because of fraudulent absentee ballots.

Voting by mail also played a crucial role in the 2000 presidential election in Florida, when the margin between George W. Bush and Al Gore was razor thin and hundreds of absentee ballots were counted in apparent violation of state law. The flawed ballots, from Americans living abroad, included some without postmarks, some postmarked after the election, some without witness signatures, some mailed from within the United States and some sent by people who voted twice. All would have been disqualified had the state’s election laws been strictly enforced.

In the recent primary here, almost 40 percent of ballots were not cast in the voting booth on the day of the election. They were split between early votes cast at polling places, which Mr. Sancho, the Leon County elections supervisor, favors, and absentee ballots, which make him nervous.

“There has been not one case of fraud in early voting,” Mr. Sancho said. “The only cases of election fraud have been in absentee ballots.”

Efforts to prevent fraud at polling places have an ironic consequence, Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School, told the Senate Judiciary Committee September last year. They will, he said, “drive more voters into the absentee system, where fraud and coercion have been documented to be real and legitimate concerns.”

“That is,” he said, “a law ostensibly designed to reduce the incidence of fraud is likely to increase the rate at which voters utilize a system known to succumb to fraud more frequently.”

[...]

Election law experts say that pulling off in-person voter fraud on a scale large enough to swing an election, with scores if not hundreds of people committing a felony in public by pretending to be someone else, is hard to imagine, to say nothing of exceptionally risky.

There are much simpler and more effective alternatives to commit fraud on such a scale, said Heather Gerken, a law professor at Yale.

“You could steal some absentee ballots or stuff a ballot box or bribe an election administrator or fiddle with an electronic voting machine,” she said. That explains, she said, “why all the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots and the like.”

“Absentee ballots also make it much easier to buy and sell votes.”

Absolutely. In the old days, Democrat party operatives would buy votes by driving real people to the polls and paying them on the drive over. With absentee ballots, no need to go anywhere. Just exchange your mail-in ballot for cash.

 

[unknown]

Signed affidavits from Michigan:

https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:dd2b302b-5a5b-4456-bdac-5c6efc5b0643

 

[dannno]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1327402113920602114




INTEL: US Military Raided Scytl Servers In Germany For Evidence After Vote Switching Scandal

https://greatgameindia.com/us-military-raided-scytl-germany/

 

[dannno]

//

 

[PRB]

Because it isn't just one person committing fraud.

not what I asked.

You have a candidate, who, for 5 years, the media convinced one side was "literally" Hitler. Would election fraud be justified if you were trying to prevent Hitler from coming to power?

no, election fraud is never justified.

 

[dannno]

https://twitter.com/MAiJiNTHEARTIST/status/1327419478536192002

 

[pcosmar]

https://twitter.com/MAiJiNTHEARTIST/status/1327419478536192002

Now that is rather Cool..

and the Butthurt is Huge.

 

[TheCount]

...

Sounds legit.

I bet this totally goes somewhere.

 

[PRB]

Sounds legit.

I bet this totally goes somewhere.

why would a random guy on twitter lie?

 

[TheCount]

why would a random guy on twitter lie?

I can't think of any reason why he would. It demonstrates a complete and firm grip on reality to believe that the Department of Defense is the federal entity which would seize evidence related to a law enforcement investigation, especially if that seizure is being conducted overseas.

This is "Marines at Langley" and "Trump nuked the deep state" tier delusion. And exactly the same credulous buffoons who believed those two adolescent masturbatory fantasies will wholly accept this.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Michigan Election Lawsuit Makes SERIOUS Allegations! Viva Frei Vlawg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2wXRFXUGw0

Here is a breakdown of the Michigan Election lawsuit. It's no joke, and makes some very serious highly-detailed allegations. Up to you too decide if there is "no evidence" of election chicanery.

lawsuit (PDF): https://greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Complaint-Costantino-FINAL-With-Exhibits.pdf

https://twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1327386014927773698

Michigan Voter Fraud Lawsuit DISMISSED - Here's Why! Viva Frei Vlawg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VozXpJ5p-g

The Michigan voter fraud that was filed last week has been dismissed. Here is the breakdown as to why. Share away!

 

[showpan]

why bother tampering with paper when you can just do that?

If you are trying to steal an election, why wouldn't you use any means possible? Paper ballots are easy to manipulate. They were filling them out on the side of a van using data on who voted and who did not. They didn't even have to have matching signatures because the Democrats changed that rule too....lol...there are also video of them filling out ballots for 5 hours in the actual polling location...lol. Ballot harvesting, stolen ballots, fake ballots, it was all too easy.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

 

[navy-vet]

wow

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

 

[navy-vet]

[video]https://freedomfighterradio.com/2020/11/11/guess-who-owns-the-digital-switch-the-trump-votes-to-biden-voting-machines/[/video]

 

[pcosmar]

I'm still curious what was found on a Seized Foreign Server,, tied to the US Election Voting Machines.