***OFFICIAL*** RNC primary debate thread (Wednesday, 23 August 2023)

F4T8SWwXoAAqW0G
 

And they aren't even our Indians like [MENTION=27246]oyarde[/MENTION].

I say we give it back to our own Indians in exchange for letting us live here. They won't listen to Klaus Schwab. They'll sure comp his drinks in the casino, but they won't listen to him.
 
Last edited:
I was one of those this morning... Very disappointed in Tucker for not questioning the whole Covid thing. I mean, are we just supposed to forget about that?! The worst travesty foisted upon the American public and none of the candidates need to delve into how they plan on punishing those responsible??

I was too. I am sure that a lot of others were hoping for that line of questioning as well.

I'm sure his campaign will use the hits to bolster his popularity rating.
 
Skip to 1:50

Post-Debate Analysis Live from Milwaukee - SYSTEM UPDATE #136
https://rumble.com/v3aydth-system-update-137.html?mref=jcwo5&mrefc=20
Very nice mention of Ron Paul:

https://rumble.com/v3aydth-system-update-137.html?start=832

Shout-out to Ron Paul @ 0:52 in the tweet vid:

https://twitter.com/SystemUpdate_/status/1694704523531395546
@GGreenwald slams out-of-touch establishment candidates at last night's GOP Debate:

"You saw these politicians—Nikki Haley, Chris Christie, Tim Scott, Mike Pence—who really sound like they're from the Republican Party of 2004-2012... I don't think they have any conception of [why] Donald Trump's victory was such a cataclysmic moment in American politics.

It isn't that Trump ushered in changes in how Republican voters were thinking about things like militarism, imperialism, war, & the swamp... those sentiments predated Trump.

He detected them and gave voice to them...

I don't think these politicians have any sense at all of the radical changes in the views of the people who compose their own party... They cannot get traction and it's inconceivable that they will because the things they're saying actually resonate now more in the Democratic Party."

Full post-debate analysis, LIVE from Milwaukee: https://rumble.com/v3aydth-system-update-137.html
 
And they aren't even our Indians like [MENTION=27246]oyarde[/MENTION].

I say we give it back to our own Indians in exchange for letting us live here. They won't listen to Klaus Schwab. They'll sure comp his drinks in the casino, but they won't listen to him.

I just think of him as The Swami and myself as Great Sachem, as far as she goes I'd let her make sandwiches for Danke
 
Why I think Trump is controlled oppo, reason #2,487: F.U.Frank Lutz is calling every person who responds to him with something other than, "Baa-aaa-aah" a Trump supporter, whether they are or not. The "master pollster" doesn't even stop to ask.

The first thing I thought was: "How did Luntz know that person was a Trump supporter?".

The second thing I thought was: "The person might have been wearing a Trump shirt or a MAGA cap or some such token, or shouting 'Trump for President!', or exhibiting any of many other possible indications".

He's telling people which team they're on. He isn't asking; this is a "pollster" who has always had a "Don't ask, tell" policy. If you refuse to define yourself according to their definitions and put yourself in one of their categories, they'll pretend like you do. It's pure psychology.

If you disagree with F.U.Frank Lutz you are a Trump Supporter. Doesn't matter if you support Trump; that has nothing to do with the definition. Now, do tell us again how all this is just because he's Too Famous To Ignore. They aren't trying to divide and conquer the "political opposition". They're trying to drive us all into the Trump Corral. And if we escape from the Trump Corral, they'll lie and say we really are in the Trump Corral.

Sure, kids, they do that to candidates they hate every cycle... :rolleyes:

Why "controlled opposition" narratives are problematic, reason #1 [1]: they're completely impervious to falsification.

They can always explain everything. "Controlled opposition" can always account for X - or for the negation of X. If X can somehow be interpreted as being in support of the "controllers" - well, then, there you go: "controlled opposition". But if X can somehow be interpreted as being in "opposition" to the controllers, then it can simply be identified as camouflage for the pretense - and there you go: "controlled opposition", again.

Thus, any event can always be interpreted as affirmative "evidence" (e.g., "Frank Luntz identified [2] a stranger as a Trump supporter [...] thus, there is a[nother] reason to think Trump is 'controlled opposition'").



[1] No other reasons are really needed.

[2] Perhaps correctly, and maybe with good reason (see the above-mentioned "second thing").
 
Last edited:
Debate Debrief with Vivek Ramaswamy | SYSTEM UPDATE #137
https://rumble.com/v3bbaej-system-update-show-137.html


CLIP:

Debate Debrief with Vivek Ramaswamy: Ukraine, GOP, China, 1776 Revolution, & More | SYSTEM UPDATE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDcx9Mq0CXE

 
Last edited:
I'm glad Haley he called out Republicans on spending and starting the current round of inflation [...]

Haley calls out Republicans for inflation and overspending....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdnNnIuXIzg

Nikki Haley showed her true colors with the "women" and "war" comments. She wants to cut spending and borrowing but wants to send more money to Ukraine AND increase spending on the border? Madness, Neocon all the way.

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1694866570323857412
eSuQMIp.png
 
They didn't expect this
Fox News recently held a debate for the Republican candidates for President in 2024. POTUS Donald Trump was not in attendance, but Vivek Ramaswamy, former VP Mike Pence, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and other more irrelevant candidates showed up. But Trump showing up on X, aka Twitter, with Tucker Carlson proves how irrelevant Fox News is to actual conservative voters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1g4LCQMaZw
 
Last edited:
Back
Top