Vivek is thoughtful, intelligent and well-spoken.
He held his own in the debate, but I couldn't help thinking he looked a little bit like a youngster playing in the adult sandbox.
The first televised presidential debate was Kennedy v. Nixon. Polls afterward said those who watched on TV said Kennedy won, and those who listened on the radio (no TV, at work, multitasking) said Nixon won (Nixon had a deeper voice than Kennedy).
Ramaswamy is having some trouble with coming across as genuine, yes. And it's no wonder that we can't get a serious debate, because nobody has had any respect for the way the public reacts to any of it from the first.
The guy with the deeper voice and the five o'clock shadow won and lost the same debate depending on if you asked the radio or TV audience. Gee, why can't we get these psychos to actually inform us in these debates, instead of posturing?
Starting to see social media comments about Vivek wanting to double down on the drug war, and create a massive inheritance tax. This guy has potential but needs some investigation for sure. I'm hearing his book and political rhetoric up until recently were very bad, but again, I haven't looked into it myself. I would like to like this guy.
It seems little Matty (if you can be on a first name basis with every politician and celebrity on the face of the earth, I can make up pet nicknames for you) doesn't trust the hard work PAF puts in on these handy On The Record threads of his...
Vivek, in a "thought experiment", says it would be better to get rid of the income tax (or reduce down to almost nothing) in trade for an increase on the inheritance tax.. nothing about collecting the same amount of money, it would be far less money to government.
Little Danny (see note above about being on a first name basis with every famous person who ever lived, do tell us more about carousing with Humphrey and Lauren), your buddy Vivek (Mr. Ramaswamy to all us poor unfortunates) made a mistake. If you're a Republican, you don't say repeal and replace.
You don't have to. People know if you can ever possibly eliminate one tax, all the rest will go up. Just say, get rid of it. We know it won't save us money, but if it makes the tax code less of a Maze of Entrapment, that's a selling point.
Why I think Trump is controlled oppo, reason #2,487: F.U.Frank Lutz is calling every person who responds to him with something other than, "
Baa-aaa-aah" a Trump supporter, whether they are or not. The "master pollster" doesn't even stop to ask.
He's telling people which team they're on. He isn't asking; this is a "pollster" who has always had a "Don't ask, tell" policy. If you refuse to define yourself according to their definitions and put yourself in one of their categories, they'll pretend like you do. It's pure psychology.
If you disagree with F.U.Frank Lutz you are a Trump Supporter. Doesn't matter if you support Trump; that has nothing to do with the definition. Now, do tell us again how all this is just because he's Too Famous To Ignore. They aren't trying to divide and conquer the "political opposition". They're trying to drive us all into the Trump Corral. And if we escape from the Trump Corral, they'll lie and say we really are in the Trump Corral.
Sure, kids, they do that to candidates they hate every cycle...
