Official: Rand Paul in!

[derek4ever]

Give me a break. His last one was an A+.

You people are ridiculous. If polls were around we would still all be British subjects.

I would've said an A but that always means there's room for improvement and Rand can still polish himself to be our choice!!

 

[derek4ever]

Rand should put a jelly doughnut on his podium just to get Christie to look shifty, distracted and sweaty.

And get Rubio a bottle of mineral water so he gets thirsty!!

 

[Brett85]

I expected more wailing and gnashing of teeth here after reading the previous thread with the prevailing sentiment that being in the undercard debate would actually be better for Rand

There are pros and cons about being in the main debate and pros and cons about being in the under card debate. Being in the main debate will make him seem more relevant to voters, but he would've had more time to speak in the under card debate and would've received headlines from debating Graham on foreign policy.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Rand Paul In!

Very possible that Trump will repeat his previous dismissive remarks, saying that Rand "doesn't belong on the stage". Rand needs to fire back with both barrels if this happens, and ask Trump why he is specifically so skeered of Rand

Rand: "Because I'm a conservative, Donald. You're not. You supported socialized medicine, the bank bailouts, the Obama stimulus: everything I was elected to fight."

 

[derek4ever]

Here's a little something to motivate the base:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGXzlRoNtHU

 

[hells_unicorn]

This is a massive plus, primarily from an optics viewpoint. I wasn't keen on the idea of being in the undercard debate because of how it would have looked to the voters. Even though Christie bounced back from being sent to the lower debate, it's only because of living in New Hampshire for the past several weeks and spending all that money there, same with Kasich. They have all their eggs in one basket and they won't go very far without a national campaign, which neither of them have. Rand has a national game plan, so him falling to the lower tier would have damaged his chances in several other areas.

While I understand why there was some pessimism earlier before this announcement, it got completely ridiculous, and there are a number of long-standing members of this forum who should be ashamed of themselves for some of the rubbish that they posted.

 

[derek4ever]

And here's the Ron Paul 2012 version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtl2ZuJpG9M

 

[Chester Copperpot]

if trump calls rand a lightweight or some other derogatory word rand should just speak in the microphone and say "go fuck yourself" talk about alot of free press

 

[rg17]

The Last March of Rand Paul!

We will defeat Trump, Hillary, Sander, Cruz and Rubio!

 

[derek4ever]

if trump calls rand a lightweight or some other derogatory word rand should just speak in the microphone and say "go fuck yourself" talk about alot of free press

And a mic drop from Rand... that would be paramount! Like a boss!!

 

[jmdrake]

There are pros and cons about being in the main debate and pros and cons about being in the under card debate. Being in the main debate will make him seem more relevant to voters, but he would've had more time to speak in the under card debate and would've received headlines from debating Graham on foreign policy.

He'll get to debate Rubio on foreign policy. I hope he points out that the 1 trillion Rubio wants in additional military spending could be found in cutting the worthless F-35.

 

[PCKY]

CNN's Tapper said he'd be on the far right side of the stage.

Better than being on the far left!

 

[squirl22]

Might be the last time or chance for Rand to be in the Main event. I would assume he won't make the cut off next time around unless he says something to get republicans wet...

Are you depressed? If so, you need to get back on your meds.

 

[squirl22]

Why is CPUd always right? Do you have a crystal ball? Seems like you were always positive about Rand making the debate...I appreciate that since there are so many debbie downers here.

 

[BenIsForRon]

He really needs to change his strategy for this debate. He needs an A+ performance n

I thought he had a great performance in the last one, where he went after Rubio. If that couldn't give him a bump I don't know what will. Still hoping for the best though.

 

[squirl22]

This is from an article at yahoo.com:

Paul kept his spot thanks to a Fox News Iowa poll released Sunday that showed him strong enough in that state, according to CNN.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/cnn-adds-christie-paul-presidential-debate-lineup-184356849.html

 

[Lord Xar]

I just hope he uses this "chance" to make some noise and say some inspiring truthful things....

He is the ONLY pro-peace candidate on that stage....
He is the ONLY one (I think cruz does too) that has a thumbs up tax plan....
He is the ONLY candidate (I think cruz also jumped on this bandwagon) that has been trumpeting auditing the fed.....

I just hope he seperates himself from all of these corporatist, mostly neo-con, clowns....

"You notice how EVERYONE on this stage, and all those pushed by the RNC are all pro-war, pro-big government, pro-banker-bailout .... except me? And who gets trashed by the RNC/MEDIA? Me... this is all controlled and staged to push forward the ordained candidate who will change NOTHING, who will do NOTHING and who will watch your liberties be swept away under the thumb of big government..... except me...." etc..

 

[cajuncocoa]

Good news!

 

[rich34]

There are 2 more debates after this one. He'll make those, too.

Of course he'll be in. I've been saying this way for quite a while now. They don't want to risk pissing off Rand or Ron Paul's base and giving themselves even more headaches. They're already talking about how Trump will cause a brokered convention. If Ron had that same opportunity with the vocal support he had things would have got a lot more interesting. They don't want Rand having that kind of support.

 

[hells_unicorn]

This is from an article at yahoo.com:

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/cnn-adds-christie-paul-presidential-debate-lineup-184356849.html

Hmm, so it turns out that Iowa and not New Hampshire, was Paul's path into this debate. I think provided that Paul continues to hammer on his current message and replicates his performance from the last debate, he should be able to increase his numbers both nationally and in Iowa to the point that next time the debate cut won't be such a nail biter.