I watched the highlight reel again, sorry, but RP nailed this debate. Anyone with half a brain can understand his answers...
As far as the "30 year old in a coma" question, Ron clearly says "NO" when Wolf asked him if we should let him die...it was the audience that laughed and maybe even Bachmann.
The 9/11 question: He was clear and concise...they started booing before he even got to the Bin Laden comments. Which leads me to believe that they turned him off half way. I doubt the average viewer would have done the same, especially a democratic audience of CNN viewers.
Paging napoleon's shadow.
The people who liked what Ron Paul had to say there are not typical Republican Primary voters. Yes, independent males in their 20s love that stuff. But they don't vote.
So Ron Paul should stop saying that and start saying things that older Republicans who always vote in primaries like.
Because the grassroots has to round up those people who like what you have to say, get them registered, and teach them about voting, or something, but it's harder GOTV work.
Paging napoleon's shadow.
I'm not serious with what I'm saying, but you see how it might not be so easy to just get a whole bunch of old Republicans to vote for you if you don't say things in debates that they like. We have to find the people who liked that - and there were a lot - and get them to vote for us. And it will be harder to get them to vote than it is to get a 75 year old to vote, who has been voting in the same place, every single election, for 30 years.
We might want to have a "My Voters" project. We're going to want to make sure these people vote, and perhaps one good way to do it is for the person who registered them, makes sure they know what they need to know, does everything they need to do, knows what they need to know. Makes sure they voted. And if they didn't, gets them a ride to the polls. The people I register are "my voters"