Obama will REQUIRE community service -- PLEASE DIGG

If y'all haven't seen this interview with G Edward Griffin and the Soviet Press agent (a KGB front organization), then do so now. It will explain all of Obamma's intentions concerning the _____Corps.

The Interview

Its all about indoctrination, conditioning, and control. If you start them young enough, you can own them by time they are old enough to vote.

TMike

+1

Everyone please watch this.

Also watch this Interview that Griffin conducted with Norman Dodd in 1982: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM
 
This is what I emailed to contacts.
Well so much for people being able to retire and schools being controlled and funded locally. Here it is from the horses mouth! The great "messiah" is going to push that high school and college students work on whatever the imperial federal government feels is important. Plus he is going to "encourage" people over 55 to serve as well.

Now before somebody goes off on "everybody should serve" and such, keep in mind that requiring 100 hours of service each year for college students would put a burden on those who have to work and study at the same time....giving an advantage to those who come from well-to-do families and don't have to work. So much for BHO sticking up for the little guy.

Spread this around and sound the alarms. Write and call your Congressman and Senators and tell them that they better not violate the 9th and 10th amendments.

Here is the source from Obama's official President Elect website Change.gov!

http://www.change.gov/americaserves
 
If this community service was REQUIRED by Obama, wouldn't we have heard Glenn Beck bashing Obama about it by now?

I get his newsletter just about every weekday...haven't heard him say anything yet.

I've heard him say something about Obama civilian army, aka "Obama youth". He did act odd today though, we'll see.
 
For those who haven't read this one yet...

http://www.lewrockwell.com/akers/akers96.html

"Per Obama’s diktat on Election Night, we must 'summon a new spirit of patriotism, of service and responsibility where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder.' Right. We weren’t working hard enough on the Federal pyramids before – now we’ll gather straw for the bricks, too."

Good laughs...
 
13th amendment

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
 
My high school didn't require community service.. but it did require that each senior take this government class. And since it was required they combined 2 rooms into one, and the class size was like 100 and there were about 4-5 teachers. And all my teachers happened to be democrats. Blah. I would have rather done community service than take that class.

But anyways if this turns out to be required of all high school students then I'll join ya guys but until then nah.
 
unbelievable... mandatory community service?

Look's like weil all be a part of the barack ohitler youth.
 
I'm still confused on how it states that schools won't get federal money without it.

Read again:
In November, Barack Obama laid out a comprehensive
plan to provide all Americans with a world-class education and give our schools a substantial infusion of fundsto support teachers and principals and improve student learning. That plan conditions that assistance on school
districts developing programs to engage students in service opportunities.

Emphasis mine...

Money starved schools (which would be basically all of them especially now that home ownership is decreasing) will not get the cash unless the enforce his service opportunities project. This is his baby, and what he will want as a legacy for his presidency. This is why he knows by tying it to the funding the schools will follow through with it.
 
They want these children indoctrinated from the cradle. For pete's sake education from zero to five??? Give me a break! So much for waldorf parenting folks like me. One of the biggest destroyers of lives in this country is department of family and children services and it looks like they will expand this organization to embrace a pro-active (see intrusive) policy towards parents of infants to five so we can gauge that they are properly educated (see indoctrinated) to be the new and improved american citizen.
 
Well, first off, it says a "goal", not a law. That was my point initially, we know NOTHING about the implementation- whether its a "goal" (e.g. like the old "thousand points of light") where the President encourages something, or if its forced by law.

BTW, I LOVE the idea of a $4k tax credit for 100 hours community service- a "credit" is a straight tax reduction (far better than a tax "deduction"). That makes each hour of "community service" worth $40- more than most people make working. Plus, I already do more than that anyway, so for me, this would save $4k in taxes.

I doubt this will fly, though- if they did, too many people would take the credit, and the govt. would lose a ton of tax revenue.
So do you believe that showing outrage while it is a plan, and not in a bill, is not a smart thing to do?

Or maybe we should only show outrage when it has passed Congress and is on the President's desk?

I'd rather people be outraged now, that way it will die a quick death, and at the planning phase.
 
Obama and Biden believe that middle
and high school students should be expected to engage in community service for 50 hours annually during the school year or summer months."

Like I said, Obami and his side kick Biden won't last long with crap like this.
 
you are all over reacting.

we'll just wait until this becomes a requirement to protest it. every legislator will wake up and so will the people, right when that first law hits the house. don't worry about gradual conditioning or laying foundations. that's what happen in 30's germany and look how well that turned out!

No. We protest now, peacefully and with our wits about us. We use the power of persuasion.

If it does indeed become law, that is when an "active" resistance will begin.

If we wait until it's law to try to point out our objections, it'll already be too late.
 
No. We protest now, peacefully and with our wits about us. We use the power of persuasion.

If it does indeed become law, that is when an "active" resistance will begin.

If we wait until it's law to try to point out our objections, it'll already be too late.


If this becomes law there will be a Republican landslide in 2012. Obama won't be able to do this and he knows it. No red-blooded American would put up with this.
 
No. We protest now, peacefully and with our wits about us. We use the power of persuasion.

If it does indeed become law, that is when an "active" resistance will begin.

If we wait until it's law to try to point out our objections, it'll already be too late.

are you sure about this? its better to wait for a bill to be brought up in congress so we can have debate and discussion on the particulars and not bother with the underlying theory and hypotheticals before hand. like the ESSA (bailout) legislation. the Fed and Treasury were talking about a bailout for a couple weeks, but it was all talk and we didn't need to get our panties in a bunch. Then, when the legislation came up in the congress, we protested, killed the bill and it was over! The people definitely spoke and the government definitely listened. That's why you wait until it becomes an actual bill to protest.
 
are you sure about this? its better to wait for a bill to be brought up in congress so we can have debate and discussion on the particulars and not bother with the underlying theory and hypotheticals before hand. like the ESSA (bailout) legislation. the Fed and Treasury were talking about a bailout for a couple weeks, but it was all talk and we didn't need to get our panties in a bunch. Then, when the legislation came up in the congress, we protested, killed the bill and it was over! The people definitely spoke and the government definitely listened. That's why you wait until it becomes an actual bill to protest.

But without protesting now, they are free to insert whatever "particulars" into a proposal. I'm not suggesting we vilify anyone, I'm saying we use reason and philosophy to explain why this is a bad proposal - put pressure on our "representatives" now, so they can't even think about writing bad legislation without feeling a backlash.

If a bill is presented with particulars that are still offensive, that is when we step up the protestation - and attack the particulars.

Fark Thread discussing this. Are people really this supportive of the plan, as written?
 
If this becomes law there will be a Republican landslide in 2012. Obama won't be able to do this and he knows it. No red-blooded American would put up with this.


And the republican's won't continue the program? They will also my will expand it into "for profit" projects and call it capitalism. Since they love the police state, they will probably militirize it much more than Obama, this will be called bipartisanship, a compromise, and moderate.
 
Back
Top