I had wondered if he would try to make it so that guns can not be legally owned in households with children.. in the cities anyways.. it would be somewhere I could see him starting for sure.. he's been pretty clear so far that he's trying to make all/most gun sales go through the system, so they'd have records for it all...
That would be nice, so people with kids couldn't even attempt to protect them from home invaders. Of course irresponsible parents sometimes leave loaded guns in reach of kids and tragedies happen, but that doesn't justify taking away all parents' rights.
He did say "child proof" though, which reminds me of this dumb game someone sent me once:
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/humor/flash/clinton_movie.asp
That's why I posted that picture.
The concept has been tested for police officers before, but it was determined that fingerprint identification, keycodes, and radio activation etc. made the gun too likely to fail in a life-and-death situation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_Gun#Criticism
Another thing he could be trying to do is force all guns to have something like this, which I still think is a bad idea:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/750506.stm
If guns are advertised as "childproof", one problem could be that some parents might assume that is 100% true and leave them in reach of children. Some kids figure out how to open "childproof" containers from their friends, I'm sure they could figure out the guns as well, especially if it was designed to be "easy" for an adult to open in a life/death situation.
Bottom line: There's no substitute, in my opinion, for responsible parents. If parents are dumb enough to leave loaded guns in reach of their unsupervised kids, especially without training them in gun safety, I doubt the government can do anything to help them.
He did mention the "closing the gun show loophole" which probably means he wants to make private sale of guns illegal or subject to the FBI NICS record system.