Obama birth certificate issue gaining momentum - Youtube video has over 560,000 views

I think of Bush as another Von Hindenburg. As horrible as the Reichstag Fire Decree was, it wasn't Hindenburg who used it for horrific purposes. I'm not sure he was capable of using it that way. I seriously wonder if Germans in 1935 were still grumbling about how bad Hindenburg was . Terrible president. Worst ever. Can't get any worse. Good thing he's gone.
 
Third or fourth most destructive presidency in history, IMO. Don't forget Honest Abe for his consolidation of federal power and 600,000 civil war deaths. That was military only; I wonder how many civilians died, especially in Sherman's march? Then we had Woody Wilson acting as the original NWO buttboy; we can thank him for the Fed and the income tax that put Fedgov on steroids and set the stage for WWII. I don't think even FDR was as big of a traitor as these two, but he likely edged out the Shrub.

Obama has a good shot at winning the cakewalk if national health care goes through and he unleashes his Brownshirts. If he goes so far as to begin re-education efforts, then the prize unquestionably belongs to him.

Bush's damage is not fully comprehended yet. Pre-emptive war, homeland security, wiretapping, spying, torture, is now a matter of US policy. The power of the executive has no bounds, and Obama can only be dangerous because of the rapid shift towards fascism brought by the Bush administrated.

Bush has made possible Cap and Trade, Univ Healthcare, the takeover of private industry, by greatly expanding the scope and power of the government.

Do you ever get the feeling the government no longer fears the citizens, that they will steamroll a pile of shit through congress even if 70% of America is vehemently opposed? Well, you have the patriot act, fisa, homeland security, etc to thank for this. This is why they don't listen. They have congress and the citizenry by the balls.
 
Last edited:
Bush's damage is not fully comprehended yet. Pre-emptive war, homeland security, wiretapping, spying, torture, is now a matter of US policy. The power of the executive has no bounds, and Obama can only be dangerous because of the rapid shift towards fascism brought by the Bush administrated.

Bush has made possible Cap and Trade, Univ Healthcare, the takeover of private industry, by greatly expanding the scope and power of the government.

Do you ever get the feeling the government no longer fears the citizens, that they will steamroll a pile of shit through congress even if 70% of America is vehemently opposed? Well, you have the patriot act, fisa, homeland security, etc to thank for this. This is why they don't listen. They have congress and the citizenry by the balls.

You're right, he was a gem!

postcard.jpg
 
Idirtify,

So you still won't click the WND link, huh? Something tells me if you don't read it on the WND website, you won't accept it as genuine. Your answers to all of these posts prove you refuse to look at proof thus setting yourself up for ignorance and denial .

Just click to go to the WND site..... it's easy,

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214

Sandra,

When I stated “World Net Daily has not as far as I have seen provided the main document needed to prove the qualification”, I was not only indicating that I had read your link but also that what you had claimed it provided was untrue. As far as who has the better question about who read what: Did you read MY statement?

Now what you need to, if you want to submit a legitimate disagreement, is show how my statement about the lack of the proving document is false. IMO you would do that by doing what I asked you to do in my last post: “Instead of you telling me to contact WND for the proof, why don’t I tell you to point it out to me in your link? It is your claim, right? So specify it by pasting it here.” IOW it is your burden to show specifically how your link supports your position, beyond merely re-referring to it in general, especially after someone like me has challenged it/you.

It is curious that you are so distrusting of me for not providing better proof that I read your link, yet you are so trusting of Obama even though he has not even tried AFAIK to prove his main qualification for the job.

BTW, what about all my points about rights and job qualifications? You have so far neglected to address them.
 
Sandra,

When I stated “World Net Daily has not as far as I have seen provided the main document needed to prove the qualification”, I was not only indicating that I had read your link but also that what you had claimed it provided was untrue. As far as who has the better question about who read what: Did you read MY statement?

Now what you need to, if you want to submit a legitimate disagreement, is show how my statement about the lack of the proving document is false. IMO you would do that by doing what I asked you to do in my last post: “Instead of you telling me to contact WND for the proof, why don’t I tell you to point it out to me in your link? It is your claim, right? So specify it by pasting it here.” IOW it is your burden to show specifically how your link supports your position, beyond merely re-referring to it in general, especially after someone like me has challenged it/you.

It is curious that you are so distrusting of me for not providing better proof that I read your link, yet you are so trusting of Obama even though he has not even tried AFAIK to prove his main qualification for the job.

BTW, what about all my points about rights and job qualifications? You have so far neglected to address them.

Typical denialist setup.... "tell me how I am wrong". Holy crap! The whole article is about how World Net Daily validated the documents with their own experts. THE WHOLE ARTICLE... Not even a year ago. So what I'm saying is your precious websit flip flopped when the eligibility issue was presented by Taitz (Republican) rather thean Berg (Democrat).
 
Bush's damage is not fully comprehended yet. Pre-emptive war, homeland security, wiretapping, spying, torture, is now a matter of US policy. The power of the executive has no bounds, and Obama can only be dangerous because of the rapid shift towards fascism brought by the Bush administrated.

Bush has made possible Cap and Trade, Univ Healthcare, the takeover of private industry, by greatly expanding the scope and power of the government.

Do you ever get the feeling the government no longer fears the citizens, that they will steamroll a pile of shit through congress even if 70% of America is vehemently opposed? Well, you have the patriot act, fisa, homeland security, etc to thank for this. This is why they don't listen. They have congress and the citizenry by the balls.

I agree, sir! :cool:
 
Bush's damage is not fully comprehended yet. Pre-emptive war, homeland security, wiretapping, spying, torture, is now a matter of US policy. The power of the executive has no bounds, and Obama can only be dangerous because of the rapid shift towards fascism brought by the Bush administrated.

Bush has made possible Cap and Trade, Univ Healthcare, the takeover of private industry, by greatly expanding the scope and power of the government.

Do you ever get the feeling the government no longer fears the citizens, that they will steamroll a pile of shit through congress even if 70% of America is vehemently opposed? Well, you have the patriot act, fisa, homeland security, etc to thank for this. This is why they don't listen. They have congress and the citizenry by the balls.

Get real. Read a little history. Did Bush lock up 200,000 Japanese and German Americans like FDR did? How is that for executive abuse of power? My mother tells a story about a Japanese American she went to school with. His family owned a nursery and when FDR ordered him and his family into a consentration camp she walked through the nursery and was sickened to see the thousands of hours of work on plants dead. These people weren't compensated until most were dead in the 1980s. How is that for civil rights? Tell me when you get out of the concentration camp.
Gitmo? They didn't even bat an eye at harsh treatment of POWs in past wars. News reporters didn't give a sh*t about POWs in those days.

I used to have a school songbook from the Wilson WWI era. Every German song was cut from the book. How is that for censorship?
I had an Aunt that spoke out against WWII and she was investigated and had a file on her at the FBI. That file was still there 40 years later when her nephew tried to get a passport to go to the middle east.
Pre-emptive war? What do you think US joining WWI was. The war to end all wars? A few more than 4000 americans died in that war.
The govenment told you what you could buy and how much during WWII. How is that for civil rights and the power of the government?
FDR ordered all gold mines closed during WWII. Most never recovered afterwards nor were they compensated. How is that for executive power?
FDR confuscated all privately owned gold and was paid with dollars. How is that for freedom of ownership? Go back a read what kind of civil rights were violated in past American wars. It used to be an acceptable way of runing things during wars.
Bush was a lousy President but was nowhere near the worst.
 
Last edited:
Typical denialist setup.... "tell me how I am wrong". Holy crap! The whole article is about how World Net Daily validated the documents with their own experts. THE WHOLE ARTICLE... Not even a year ago. So what I'm saying is your precious websit flip flopped when the eligibility issue was presented by Taitz (Republican) rather thean Berg (Democrat).

Me asking you to support your disagreement is a “typical denialist setup”?? Since when? Not that I’m sure about the meaning of your term, but I think explaining how your opponent is wrong is only the most basic fundamental of intellectual debate.

When you imply that the “WHOLE ARTICLE” shows that I am wrong, you are not being honest. You claim the proof of Obama’s citizenship is contained in your linked article from WND; but since it does not contain the proving document (the original BC), or any photocopies of it, you are incorrect. The only thing that allows you to semi-credibly claim that it’s “proof” is your lower standard of proof. Why are you lowering the typical standard of proof for qualifying for the position of POTUS? Upon what do you base your greater trust in the claims of authority? Do you understand that one of the main themes of this forum is distrust of authority? Don’t you think the POTUS should be held to a HIGHER STANDARD?
 
Me asking you to support your disagreement is a “typical denialist setup”?? Since when? Not that I’m sure about the meaning of your term, but I think explaining how your opponent is wrong is only the most basic fundamental of intellectual debate.

When you imply that the “WHOLE ARTICLE” shows that I am wrong, you are not being honest. You claim the proof of Obama’s citizenship is contained in your linked article from WND; but since it does not contain the proving document (the original BC), or any photocopies of it, you are incorrect. The only thing that allows you to semi-credibly claim that it’s “proof” is your lower standard of proof. Why are you lowering the typical standard of proof for qualifying for the position of POTUS? Upon what do you base your greater trust in the claims of authority? Do you understand that one of the main themes of this forum is distrust of authority? Don’t you think the POTUS should be held to a HIGHER STANDARD?


Hello newbie! Thanks for sloppily exposing what you do in forums. Are you the genius on Orly Taitz legal team?
 
French is considered the "official language" in much international law so it is certainly possible that the founders were aware of and had read it. Pretty sure Jefferson knew French and was very well read. I don't discount it due to its not being translated into English. It is just more important what our own laws say about citizenship than what he said. Vattel (as I have since learned I made an eroneous assumption about his being French- he was actually Swiss) copied his ideas (and added to them) from the works of others- as may have done.

James Madison could read French, ancient Greek, Latin, Spanish, and Italian.

I'm not sure that Jefferson could read French.

When Madison was secretary of State, he often had to re-translate dispatched from France that were poorly translated, which prevented misunderstandings.
 
So, let me see if I got this right. All of you supporting Obama for what is technically a Birth Announcement (without a verifiable physicians signature or name of a hospital) are happy that Obama got elected instead of Ron Paul.

Why are you such people even on this forum other than to serve as trolls on issues like this?

It is a Constitutional issue folks. It is clearly stated that the President must be a natural born citizen of the United States. Obama has a responsibility to prove his citizenship with a verifiable document - not a birth announcement.

For those of you who want the real story instead of someone else's trolling here:

YouTube - Dobbs Tells Roland Martin To Pipe Down During Obama Birth Debate

Wildlander
 
Last edited:
James Madison could read French, ancient Greek, Latin, Spanish, and Italian.

I'm not sure that Jefferson could read French.

When Madison was secretary of State, he often had to re-translate dispatched from France that were poorly translated, which prevented misunderstandings.
Thank you for the information. I knew that France was one of our allies during the Revolution so the founders were most likely aware of what a lot of thinkers at the time had to say about governemnt. Ben Franklin was sent as a representative to France so it is certainly possible and even probable that they knew of and read Vittel. But again, what US law says about who is a citizen is more important than what he has to say about the issue.

Wow. Page ten on an issue which is not going to do anything. Obama releases a legal document which shows that he was born in Hawaii and Hawiian officials verify it. Some then claim that this document is not enough. Show us the long form (which would say the same thing but have more details such as the name of the doctor but would not say anything different about where he was actually born). The form shown is acceptable as a legal document proving birth and citizenship. It is probably what he presented to enroll in school or to apply for his US passport. It is a verified legal document.

"Release the full document" some people cry. "That wil end all of the questions right there." But would it? Then the questioners will claim it to be a fake document. Asking for the long form instead of the sort form is only trying to keep the issue alive for some folks. For the majority, the question has been answered. As was pointed out in the Lou Dobbs video above, some 13% still believe he is a Muslim which has been repeatedly deined. Releasing any more documents will not change any minds but would just add more fuel to the issue. It will not lead to forcing the President to resign. It will not lead to a new election where people see the light and elect Ron Paul as president. It will not lead to any appointments or laws being tossed out. It will change nothing.

Lou Dobbs agrees that Obama is president and a US citizen- as he admits in his video. Why does he continue to talk about the issue then? Because stupid and controversial issues will make people watch his show. More viewers equals more advertising revenue which in turn means more money for Lou. He is not trying to get Obama thrown out. He is trying to sell Advil or whoever his sponsors are. He will bring in controversial people to talk about it again because it will hopefully draw in more viewers. It is not about "getting to the truth of the matter". Pick an issue, bring in people on both sides and try to get them to go after each other about it.

As I have already said a few times, the only way you can get any change out of this issue is to find and present verifyable proof that he was born elsewhere and I have seen absolutely none of that anywhere.
 
Get real. Read a little history. Did Bush lock up 200,000 Japanese and German Americans like FDR did? How is that for executive abuse of power? My mother tells a story about a Japanese American she went to school with. His family owned a nursery and when FDR ordered him and his family into a consentration camp she walked through the nursery and was sickened to see the thousands of hours of work on plants dead. These people weren't compensated until most were dead in the 1980s. How is that for civil rights? Tell me when you get out of the concentration camp.
Gitmo? They didn't even bat an eye at harsh treatment of POWs in past wars. News reporters didn't give a sh*t about POWs in those days.

I used to have a school songbook from the Wilson WWI era. Every German song was cut from the book. How is that for censorship?
I had an Aunt that spoke out against WWII and she was investigated and had a file on her at the FBI. That file was still there 40 years later when her nephew tried to get a passport to go to the middle east.
Pre-emptive war? What do you think US joining WWI was. The war to end all wars? A few more than 4000 americans died in that war.
The govenment told you what you could buy and how much during WWII. How is that for civil rights and the power of the government?
FDR ordered all gold mines closed during WWII. Most never recovered afterwards nor were they compensated. How is that for executive power?
FDR confuscated all privately owned gold and was paid with dollars. How is that for freedom of ownership? Go back a read what kind of civil rights were violated in past American wars. It used to be an acceptable way of runing things during wars.
Bush was a lousy President but was nowhere near the worst.

I agree that if we were in a World War, the atrocities would be worse. That is what is so scary, is that all of these civil rights liberties violations were done outside a major war, unless you consider the War on Terror to be completely legit.

Also, everything that Bush has done, is not out yet, as the stench under the floor is just creeping out, but the door has not been opened up yet. Sometimes, it takes years for the full truth to come out.

How many Muslims disappeared after 911? There were some articles that I have read that said thousands were kidnapped in NYC, and never to be heard from again. Nobody knows how many people have been kidnapped and thrown into secret prisons since 911, but the number is likely staggering. Gitmo, is just a red herring compared to extraordinary rendition.

Also, there is reputable sources that say we tortured and raped children in front of their parents. This satanic deed that was likely authorized from high up may be a new low for us. I believe the reports, because it is always much worst than originally thought, and this is coming from the same guy who originally broke the Abu Graib story.

How many people are surveilled now and have files on them? Probably every single one of us judging by the criteria on the MIAC reports. We know our emails are read, our websurfing tracked, etc. Look at how many are on the no fly list? We now have troops on the street, in violation of Posse Commatatus. Antiwar groups, and other peacful groups are routinely surveiled and infiltrated, etc. I can go on, and on.

Was Bush the worst ever? I guess we'll know at some point, but I do agree with you that Wilson and FDR were tyrants, and may be worse depending on what all come out. What happened to the Japanese was beyond atrocious, but this took a while to come out too, and the gvt took forever to own up to it.

By the way, I never said Bush was the worst, just that he gave Obma a huge assist if he gets out of control with his new found executive power. I am quite well read on history, and was aware of the civil rights violations you wrote about it including the gold confiscation. I still have grandparents alive.

Also, Gitmo prisoners are not PWOs, they are enemy combatitants and are not even afforded basic rights that a PWO is supposed to have. Most were drug out in the middle of the night from their homes.
 
Last edited:
The birthers are taking online "classes" to make the BC issue overtake forums and commentary on blogs. Check out the new posters.

Is there any way to move this from General Politics?
 
I agree that if we were in a World War, the atrocities would be worse. That is what is so scary, is that all of these civil rights liberties violations were done outside a major war, unless you consider the War on Terror to be completely legit.

Also, everything that Bush has done, is not out yet, as the stench under the floor is just creeping out, but the door has not been opened up yet. Sometimes, it takes years for the full truth to come out.

How many Muslims disappeared after 911? There were some articles that I have read that said thousands were kidnapped in NYC, and never to be heard from again. Nobody knows how many people have been kidnapped and thrown into secret prisons since 911, but the number is likely staggering. Gitmo, is just a red herring compared to extraordinary rendition.

Also, there is reputable sources that say we tortured and raped children in front of their parents. This satanic deed that was likely authorized from high up may be a new low for us. I believe the reports, because it is always much worst than originally thought, and this is coming from the same guy who originally broke the Abu Graib story.

How many people are surveilled now and have files on them? Probably every single one of us judging by the criteria on the MIAC reports. We know our emails are read, our websurfing tracked, etc. Look at how many are on the no fly list? We now have troops on the street, in violation of Posse Commatatus. Antiwar groups, and other peacful groups are routinely surveiled and infiltrated, etc. I can go on, and on.

Was Bush the worst ever? I guess we'll know at some point, but I do agree with you that Wilson and FDR were tyrants, and may be worse depending on what all come out. What happened to the Japanese was beyond atrocious, but this took a while to come out too, and the gvt took forever to own up to it.

By the way, I never said Bush was the worst, just that he gave Obma a huge assist if he gets out of control with his new found executive power. I am quite well read on history, and was aware of the civil rights violations you wrote about it including the gold confiscation. I still have grandparents alive.

Also, Gitmo prisoners are not PWOs, they are enemy combatitants and are not even afforded basic rights that a PWO is supposed to have. Most were drug out in the middle of the night from their homes.
I guess in the context of the other posts I thought you were were arguing with the guy that stated Bush was third or fourth. I am no Bush fan and agree he gave Obama a big boost up and Obama is taking full advantage or it.
 
I guess in the context of the other posts I thought you were were arguing with the guy that stated Bush was third or fourth. I am no Bush fan and agree he gave Obama a big boost up and Obama is taking full advantage or it.

Nah, the point I was making was that we don't know yet how bad Bush was. If Obama rounds people up, it was only because it already happened to the Muslims as a trial run, plus the patriot act, fisa, homeland security, torture, military commissions act, etc. All of the hardwork was done by Bush, all we need is the right crisis. The framework is there and took 8 years of hard work by Shrub. I would say he has shifted US policy into a new era, much like Woodrow and FDR did before.
 
The birthers are taking online "classes" to make the BC issue overtake forums and commentary on blogs. Check out the new posters.

Is there any way to move this from General Politics?

Just a couple of newbies in the thread- most others seem to have been around a while.
 
I haven't read this entire thread, because I don't care...and I won't read it again after posting this:

Whether or not Barack Obama is a legal U.S. citizen is about as relevant as whether or not '9/11 was an inside job.' If true, neither will be proven until about 50 years after the big government wave crashes over the shore; and not only will they not be proven, but most people will not be convinced of them until they are. See: JFK assassination, non-ratification of 16th amendment, etc....

My point is - and it's a point I've made before here - there are more important things to worry about. Things that will be more productive than beating your head against the conspiratorial wall. Educating people about basic government activities, for example, might bear more results than, say, trying to convince them that everything they've ever accepted as true is a lie.
 
Back
Top