The UN “New World Order” Has Now Been Published: No Longer a “Conspiracy Theory”

[69360]

You do realize that both the unnwo website and the "news" article linking to it are both fakes right?

 

[Created4]

You do realize that both the unnwo website and the "news" article linking to it are both fakes right?

[sigh] Do we have to go through this again? No, this is not a fake.

 

[PAF]

You do realize that both the unnwo website and the "news" article linking to it are both fakes right?

It appears to be not legitimate. Sometimes it happens, we should all verify everything.

 

[Created4]

It appears to be not legitimate. Sometimes it happens, we should all verify everything.

Did you even bother watching Spiro's video where he fact checked this?

It is all true. It is not an official site of the UN, but the people who put up the site are all connected to the UN, and these initiatives were implemented by UN resolutions.

What's the problem here? People can't watch a 12 minute video and then follow the links that back up what he reported?

 

[PAF]

Did you even bother watching Spiro's video where he fact checked this?

It is all true. It is not an official site of the UN, but the people who put up the site are all connected to the UN, and these initiatives were implemented by UN resolutions.

What's the problem here? People can't watch a 12 minute video and then follow the links that back up what he reported?

I did watch the Spiro video, I actually watch all of them. Spiro does an outstanding job and I agree with him. I was merely referencing the UNNWO site itself which does not belong to the actual UN. But you are absolutely right, those people that put up that site are UN supporters.

 

[Created4]

I did watch the Spiro video, I actually watch all of them. Spiro does an outstanding job and I agree with him. I was merely referencing the UNNWO site itself which does not belong to the actual UN. But you are absolutely right, those people that put up that site are UN supporters.

Not only "supporters" but part of the UN. And the initiatives were all passed by UN resolutions.

So why are you saying the site is "not legitimate?"

 

[donnay]

First of all, I don't think you have to tell me I "need" to understand anything from you that is written in the Bible, as I have read it many dozens of times in my life, and have a Bachelor's Degree in Bible and Greek. I also don't need "commentaries" to explain it from a certain perspective.

This is what you wrote in response to AngryCanadian:





These ^^^^ are NOT God's words. They are your words in response to AngryCanadian, to seemingly justify Christian discrimination. If they are not, then please clarify, because whether or not Patton was a "Christian" is irrelevant. What is relevant is the Word of God, and as I pointed out, there is NO DISCRIMINATION in the New Covenant.

And I will call it out wherever it rears its ugly head (which I hope is not happening here!)

Patton was a devout Christian who loathed the Russian Government.

These are GOD'S WORDS as I wrote above.

Romans 9:13

“As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”


Esau, Red, Edom, Russia's Symbol, The Bear
http://biblestudyforlife.com/russia.htm

 

[Created4]

Patton was a devout Christian who loathed the Russian Government.

These are GOD'S WORDS as I wrote above.

Romans 9:13

“As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”


Esau, Red, Edom, Russia's Symbol, The Bear
http://biblestudyforlife.com/russia.htm

Yes, but applying them to Patton and whatever his views were are YOUR words.

 

[Ender]

Yes, but applying them to Patton and whatever his views were are YOUR words.

Patton was smart enough to know what the Russian gov was doing to it's people. Our wonderful ally, Stalin, killed millions more than Hitler, but that was covered up for a long time, because, you know, war is the health of the state.

Patton's plan, once he got out of Germany, go home, retire from the military & then speak all over the US about the atrocities of our involvement in WWII. That could not be allowed.

 

[69360]

Did you even bother watching Spiro's video where he fact checked this?

It is all true. It is not an official site of the UN, but the people who put up the site are all connected to the UN, and these initiatives were implemented by UN resolutions.

What's the problem here? People can't watch a 12 minute video and then follow the links that back up what he reported?

The website is FAKE. Story over.

I don't like the UN and would like to see the US pull out of it. The story is still fake.

 

[Created4]

The website is FAKE. Story over.

I don't like the UN and would like to see the US pull out of it. The story is still fake.

Well, you've provided such overwhelming evidence here that it is fake that is must be so....

 

[PAF]

The website is FAKE. Story over.

I don't like the UN and would like to see the US pull out of it. The story is still fake.

The story and the website are not fake. It is not owned by the actual United Nations, but Created4 is correct that the people who own/operate the UNNWO website are proponents of the U.N. When I first researched the site, I simply did a whois and noted that.

At least listen to the video.

 

[Created4]

It is not owned by the actual United Nations.

Jayme Illien is the registered owner of the site according to Whois, and he is definitely on the UN payroll, so I wouldn't say it is not owned by the UN. They just don't link to it (yet.)

But there are many of these affiliate organizations out there funded by the UN. Illien has ties to the CIA as well.

 

[Firestarter]

The story and the website are not fake. It is not owned by the actual United Nations, but Created4 is correct that the people who own/operate the UNNWO website are proponents of the U.N. When I first researched the site, I simply did a whois and noted that.

At least listen to the video.

I've had enough of mind numbing videos. It is a huge problem that people can't read (anymore)...

But that wasn’t the point made by @Created4 originally is it?
I’ve searched the UN site without a single reference to the UNNWrg...

If we follow the arguing of @Created4 in another thread, we only have to replace RFK Jr. with UN...
PR Newswire?!?

RFK Jr. would never comment on an obscure site like this. It would be all over the media....

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...e-by-Moderna&p=6949619&viewfull=1#post6949619

Well, you've provided such overwhelming evidence here that it is fake that is must be so....

So what is it? UNNWO isn't an official UN site is it? If I'm wrong please show some "evidence".
It are stories like these that give Snopes the credibility it doesn't deserve!

 

[Created4]

I've had enough of mind numbing videos. It is a huge problem that people can't read (anymore)...

But that wasn’t the point made by @Created4 originally is it?
I’ve searched the UN site without a single reference to the UNNWrg...

If we follow the arguing of @Created4 in another thread, we only have to replace RFK Jr. with UN...
PR Newswire?!?

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...e-by-Moderna&p=6949619&viewfull=1#post6949619



So what is it? UNNWO isn't an official UN site is it? If I'm wrong please show some "evidence".
It are stories like these that give Snopes the credibility it doesn't deserve!

Yes, it was all a trick by RFK Jr. to fake everyone out. You nailed it. Maybe Snopes has some job openings you could apply for....

 

[Firestarter]

Yes, it was all a trick by RFK Jr. to fake everyone out. You nailed it. Maybe Snopes has some job openings you could apply for....

I remember that you falsely claimed that RFK jr. didn't write that story!

There is no "New World Order" program by the UN.
The UNNWrg is no site of the UN.

I don't even think that you are intentionally misleading people, but you sure are wasting my time.
You can now twist and turn that the goofball that got you fooled into believing his publicity stunt, is some major figure, but that is nothing more than a silly "conspiracy theory"...

 

[Created4]

I remember that you falsely claimed that RFK jr. didn't write that story!

He didn't write that story on that site. That was a true statement. But facts don't seem to matter to you, so I will not waste my time debating this with you....

 

[Firestarter]

He didn't write that story on that site. That was a true statement. But facts don't seem to matter to you, so I will not waste my time debating this with you....

You falsely claimed that it wasn't HIS story because it would be all over the media instead on some obscure site (more obscure than PRNewswire?)!

It was HIS story, maybe you missed it...

Lol guys, RFK Jr. did post it on his site and then the obscure sites posted it: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...as-20-serious-injury-rate-in-high-dose-group/ The original post also has links to documentation.

 

[Created4]

You falsely claimed that it wasn't HIS story because it would be all over the media instead on some obscure site (more obscure than PRNewswire?)!

It was HIS story, maybe you missed it...

You're confused. There was nothing on PRNewswire, and the link to the story on his site was published days later. What they were publishing was something on Instragram, but no article had been written yet.

But who cares? What's your point? The owner of the NWO website is on the UN Payroll, he got the initiatives approved by a UN resolution, these resolutions/programs are funded by the UN, and your claim that it is a "fake" website is what? The fact that the main UN website is not linking to it yet?

That's called an argument from silence fallacy. You have zero proof to back up your claim that it is a fake site.

We're done here.....

 

[Firestarter]

You're confused. There was nothing on PRNewswire, and the link to the story on his site was published days later. What they were publishing was something on Instragram, but no article had been written yet.

You are twisting and truning defending a BS story!

It's not fake.

See: https://www.activistpost.com/2020/0...ted-nations-new-world-order-website-real.html

Where's your evidence?!? Or are only other members supposed to give "evidence"?!?

There are 2 things here the UNIDO happiness BS which is real and the UNNWrg that according to Illien was launched in 2008.
I still haven’t found anything about the UNNWrg besides the story from a site I don’t know, PRnewswire (that Illien cited for reference on his Wikpedia page)...

The following is the only link from what looks like a “reliable” source from the Activistpost article (or is the "evidence" hidden away in another mind numbing Youtube video that I didn't watch?).
The problem is that it is nothing more than a copy-paste article from again PRnewswire (Yahoo.com regularly deletes article by the way)...

United Nations NWO (UNNWO) Launches COVID 19 Coronavirus Focused International Day of Happiness 2020 Campaign Theme HAPPINESS FOR ALL TOGETHER
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/united-nations-nwo-unnwo-launches-110000578.html

Maybe you missed my first post...
To which you replied without any evidence that it isn't "fake"?!?

It looks “fake” to me. Or at least not an official UN website...
I searched the internet for more information, but there is none.

Ndaba Mandela IS a grandson of the crooked lawyer Nelson Mandela, made the first black president of South Africa. I couldn’t find anything to connect him to the “United Nations New World Order Project”.

It looks like Jayme Illien has made up this story as a publicity stunt. His Wikipedia page looks to have been written by Illien himself and has been deleted by Wikipedia on 23 May.
This story includes the claim that the “United Nations New World Order Project” was launched in 2008.

What seems true though, is that Illien once founded the United Nations International Day of Happiness.
Whatever that is?

Here’s the archived version of Illien’s Wiki page: http://archive.is/BVHem

The links in Illien’s Wiki page that supposedly show that the “United Nations New World Order Project” was launched in 2008, make no such claims.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...uly-4-us-independence-day-2019-300880251.html
https://happinessday.org/leadership/happiness-day-founder/jayme-illien/

But who cares? What's your point? The owner of the NWO website is on the UN Payroll, he got the initiatives approved by a UN resolution, these resolutions/programs are funded by the UN, and your claim that it is a "fake" website is what? The fact that the main UN website is not linking to it yet?

That's called an argument from silence fallacy. You have zero proof to back up your claim that it is a fake site.

If it isn't fake than why don't you give us some information on this non-existent UN "New World Order" project?!? Which "resolution" got this initiative "approved"?!?
He's a goofball that got you fooled with a publicity stunt (the UN won't mind as it's fake stories like these that keep the "real" stories out of the spotlight).