Now a Michelle Malkin/O’Reilly Factor Hit Piece?

[joshdvm]

Now a Michelle Malkin/O’Reilly Factor Hit Piece?

I tuned into the O’Reilly Factor tonight (Mon, 5/21) and I caught the tail end of a piece done by guest host Michelle Malkin. All I caught was her saying to a blonde (paraphrasing), “…he says he has nothing to do with 9-11 Truth, but that’s not good enough! If someone came up to me and said 9-11 was an inside job, I’d tell them to go away!!”

Not sure how accurate my memory is, but did anybody else see this? She’s obviously referring to RP, right? If someone has a YouTube link, greatly appreciated.

 

[billv]

Yeah, she'd say that because she sounds like she's a raving bitch. But then again, I could be wrong.

 

[cujothekitten]

Damn right Malken! The president should completely ignore a portion of the population because many don't agree with them. That'll teach those jerks to ask questions!

Seriously, I'm not a truther but that comment she made was pretty much crap. Last time I checked they're Americans as well. If a presidential candidate wants to listen to their grievances then he shouldn't be bashed for it.

 

[TruePatriot44]

Michelle is horribly biased, she doesn't even try to hide it. If you get bored, read the forums at her site (hotair.com), her followers are equally stupid.

 

[aravoth]

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BVTgwdJlDFw

posted on the wrong thread

 

[enan]

I sent in an e-mail to them that requested he actually be interviewed by O'Reilly (would that be a necessarily good or bad thing? I mean, RP fared pretty well against Giuliani. Of course, O'Reilly's in a league of spin all his own)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77538,00.html

O'Reilly's e-mail is [email protected]

 

[kylejack]

I sent in an e-mail to them that requested he actually be interviewed by O'Reilly (would that be a necessarily good or bad thing? I mean, RP fared pretty well against Giuliani. Of course, O'Reilly's in a league of spin all his own)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77538,00.html

O'Reilly's e-mail is [email protected]

She states that Ron Paul declined.

Stuff like this really stings the campaign, I think. It worries me.

 

[billv]

Yeah, unfortunately. Everyone gets the wrong first impression of him. God damn media trying to cram the same shit down our throats every election.

 

[billv]

You will trust the official story or you will be sent to a re-education camp.

 

[propanes]

She has trouble bringing on guests

Says her blog:

"Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, Sen. Lindsay Graham and Rep. Ron Paul all declined to appear on the program tonight, make of that what you will...

 

[zMtLlC]

Now, I'm not a "truther," mostly because I haven't seen any evidence beyond speculation on it, but I think she's downright absurd. What's so wrong with having an investigation? What if these "fringe" people actually turned out to be right? Would the investigation be worth it? Is it a waste of time then?

But, yeah, has anyone gotten a reply yet on why he didn't go on the O'Reilly Factor? Well, he does have a job and all, so that may be part of it.

 

[enan]

I remember reading somewhere that there actually was a separate 9/11 commission which was headed by civilians. I don't remember if they made much headway or not.

 

[LizF]

Now, I'm not a "truther," mostly because I haven't seen any evidence beyond speculation on it, but I think she's downright absurd. What's so wrong with having an investigation? What if these "fringe" people actually turned out to be right? Would the investigation be worth it? Is it a waste of time then?

But, yeah, has anyone gotten a reply yet on why he didn't go on the O'Reilly Factor? Well, he does have a job and all, so that may be part of it.

I wonder how good it would be for RP to go on O'Reilly (I haven't watched the show in years). If Malkin were hosting/filling-in, she *might* not be worse than Hannity was when he interviewed RP after the 2nd debate. However, if it was O'Reilly himself, I think he would be even more gratuitously obnoxious, probably shouting at his producer to "Cut his mike! cut his mike!" like he's done with other guests.

 

[propanes]

In a 2002 article Michelle Malkin appears her self to have been a "truther".

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin030802.asp

 

[hhholmes]

Michelle Malkin is nothing more than a race-baiting bimbo. She gets all peppered-up with her anti-immigrant rants (never makes a distinction between those of legal status); forgetting that her own kind of creature would be an impossibility if her own policies were carried out; and generally advocates the most fascist, anti-American, positions she can find. She is among the rankest of the cowardly "warforeverrrrrrr" crowd; and it is a daily surprise that the living God tolerates her existence among us....He does work in mysterious ways....

 

[NMCB3]

I think an appearance on O`Reilly's show would be great for RP. Bill can be an ass, but Ron will just speak sensibly like he always does. He would gain some new supporters for sure.

 

[joeu]

I tuned into the O’Reilly Factor tonight (Mon, 5/21) and I caught the tail end of a piece done by guest host Michelle Malkin. All I caught was her saying to a blonde (paraphrasing), “…he says he has nothing to do with 9-11 Truth, but that’s not good enough! If someone came up to me and said 9-11 was an inside job, I’d tell them to go away!!”

Not sure how accurate my memory is, but did anybody else see this? She’s obviously referring to RP, right? If someone has a YouTube link, greatly appreciated.

Here's the link.... http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/...n-ron-paul-and-the-truthers-on-the-big-story/

I appreciated Malkin's take on immigration but was taken aback by her lack of
intellectual honesty in this video.

 

[Aratus]

i've noticed that the earlier ancient pages are full of short 3 to 5 or 7 page topics,
and from time to time people REALLY complain about the inequality of access
for Ron Paul initially, when they aren't providing links to webpages or u-tube videos.
many of the long term posters here are deja vu all over again, and been there done that...
the problem is, without an edited down archive, or a similar forum area and ability
to quickly communicate a problem or project, any effort in 2010 or 2012 would only
be reduced to a trail and error approach ALL OVER again if there is no learning curve!!!
there must be some way for someone to get together a condensed string of postings...

 

[Sandra]

Accepting an invitation to be on O'Reilly makes people look desparate for publicity. He's really nothing now.

 

[Aratus]

true... and Ron Paul is still in the running.
Jesse Benton today has an interview, and FOX news
is FINALLY covering Ron Paul's campaign as gov. richardson
likes obama, as john edwards holds back from either
ms. hillary and/or mr. barack! this is after bernadine dohrn
now gets involved in political fundraising!

i luv politics! this race is sorta fun! even now...