smartguy911
Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,992
there is a site dedicated to her - http://michellemalkinisanidiot.com/
Now a Michelle Malkin/O’Reilly Factor Hit Piece?
- Thread starter joshdvm
- Start date
ryanmkeisling
Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,502
Last edited:
You're replying to a post from May of last year.
szczebrzeszyn
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,401
oops, WTH?
I didn't see it, but that could be about a lot of people. And no what who she was talking about, she is RIGHT. Ron Paul KILLED his campaign by not telling the troofers to get the hell off his coat tails. He should have refused money from anyone who believed that crap, and distanced himself from it. He should distance himself from Alex Jones as well. These are NOT reputable "journalists" we are talking about. If you hang out with crazy people, then people will tend to think that you are crazy as well.
there, i caught your attention, i gave this thread a focus, and even if
the decision tree approach by HQ over the next few weeks goes along
another path other than now paying for another blimp or string of superbowl ads...
at least we now shall take a breather and give ourselves a kinder perspective on this!!!
the decision tree approach by HQ over the next few weeks goes along
another path other than now paying for another blimp or string of superbowl ads...
at least we now shall take a breather and give ourselves a kinder perspective on this!!!
the other problem is, FOX news sent him into a news "ghetto" of stereotypical predictability.
they slanted their coverage, and slowly tied the 'tin cans to his tail" proverbially... we did
have a problem. truthers do not go away because Bush is hiding something. its not Ron Paul
who made a string of snap decisions on September 12th of 2001. all of us backed our potus, then...
they slanted their coverage, and slowly tied the 'tin cans to his tail" proverbially... we did
have a problem. truthers do not go away because Bush is hiding something. its not Ron Paul
who made a string of snap decisions on September 12th of 2001. all of us backed our potus, then...
Sorry, but a 2009 Superbowl ad would be pissing the money away. Seriously...do you know ANYTHING about marketing? By the time 2012 came around, you know how many people would remember that ad? ZERO. Not an exaggeration. ZERO people. So just take hte money and burn it.
Oh, and you should also know that despite the ridiculously high prices, Superbowl ads have proven to be VERY INEFFECTIVE. They are not worth the cost. Buying 10 $300,000 commercials will reach more people (and get them to pay attention) than one $3 million Superbowl ad.
But honestly...for people who blast the official campaign, it is funny to see someone suggest a 2009 ad for the 2012 race. That is literally the DUMBEST suggestion ever made in the history of human communication. Especially since you don't even know if he plans on running (no one is going to elect a 77 year old man)...and if McCain wins, it is a moot point unless he leaves the GOP...(and no...don't suggest that Ron Paul would be able to unseat a sitting president for the party nomination.)
Oh, and you should also know that despite the ridiculously high prices, Superbowl ads have proven to be VERY INEFFECTIVE. They are not worth the cost. Buying 10 $300,000 commercials will reach more people (and get them to pay attention) than one $3 million Superbowl ad.
But honestly...for people who blast the official campaign, it is funny to see someone suggest a 2009 ad for the 2012 race. That is literally the DUMBEST suggestion ever made in the history of human communication. Especially since you don't even know if he plans on running (no one is going to elect a 77 year old man)...and if McCain wins, it is a moot point unless he leaves the GOP...(and no...don't suggest that Ron Paul would be able to unseat a sitting president for the party nomination.)
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
I had the pleasure of meeting Rand at the Boston Tea Party rally.
He's a very serious man, perhaps even more so than his dad, and fully understands the danger our nation and our liberty is in.
Trouble is, I think he has no taste for "politics". 'Course that's just my own personal read on the man's character, I could be completely wrong.
i did think this video was funny, i saw it on the grannywarriors site...
i was sore tempted to run it during the superbowl but i am a hippie...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=AcBb3PudTcA think inserting a flash
ad of RAND PAUL in 2012 at the end of the video... (i sorta feel for the guy!)
i was sore tempted to run it during the superbowl but i am a hippie...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=AcBb3PudTcA think inserting a flash
ad of RAND PAUL in 2012 at the end of the video... (i sorta feel for the guy!)
Last edited:
Similar threads
