New Iowa Poll, Rand in second place... [mod note: fake website]

[LatinsforPaul]

Though this poll, I think, does not count for the debates...

http://prntly.com/blog/?p=2842

The latest polling in Iowa, done by AMP Analytics, of 2432 phone respondents, shows Trump is #1 in Iowa, while Rand Paul has surged to #2, with Ted Cruz close behind at number 3.

The worst news comes to the “establishment” candidates, Jeb Bush and John Kasich. Jeb is at .05%, or less than 1%. Kasich received 1 vote out of thousands polled, losing to Lindsay Graham and George Pataki.

Full Polling details follow:


Which Candidate do you support for President
Donald J Trump 956
Dr. Ben Carson 210
Ted Cruz 341
Rand Paul 482
Marco Rubio 150
Jeb Bush 31
Chris Christie 50
John Kasich 1
Mike Huckabee 49
Carly Fiorina 24
George Pataki 18
Lindsay Graham 10
None of the above 2
2324

Breakdown:
Ideology
Conservative 1203
Very Conservative 721
Moderate 321
Liberal 79
2324

Religion
Evangelical 1492
Non-Evangelical 832
2324

Income:
0-25000 952
25-50000 981
50-100000 317
100,000+ 74
2324

Total: 2324
Poll conducted 11/25/15-11/27/15
Phone Line Poll with 2324 respondants
Prntly polling Mr. Portelli, Mr. Balough, Mr.
Dunlevy

 

[LatinsforPaul]

SHOCK: Rand Paul crushes Rubio in new poll, 2nd in Iowa

Yesterday Prntly.com released the latest polling in Iowa, done by AMP Calypso INC Analytics, of 2432 phone respondents, which shows Trump is #1 in Iowa, while Rand Paul has surged to #2, with Ted Cruz close behind at number 3.

The worst news comes to the “establishment” candidates, Jeb Bush and John Kasich. Jeb is at .05%, or less than 1%. Kasich received 1 vote out of thousands polled, losing to Lindsay Graham and George Pataki. The polling was done with registered voters within the State of Iowa who have voted in at least three of the last four Republican primary elections.

Full Polling details follow:

Which Candidate do you support for President
Donald J Trump 956
Dr. Ben Carson 210
Ted Cruz 341
Rand Paul 482
Marco Rubio 150
Jeb Bush 31
Chris Christie 50
John Kasich 1
Mike Huckabee 49
Carly Fiorina 24
George Pataki 18
Lindsay Graham 10
None of the above 2
Total: 2324

 

[Mike4Freedom]

The sample size they used is huge. The campaign must be doing things in Iowa we dont know about. This is very encouraging.

 

[luctor-et-emergo]

The sample size they used is huge. The campaign must be doing things in Iowa we dont know about. This is very encouraging.

Yeah the sample looks pretty decent. Large enough and it looks like a pretty decent cross section.

 

[hells_unicorn]

This is excellent news, and it absolutely will not be covered by the MSM. This poll does precisely what so-called "mainstream" polls are not supposed to do, seek out a more accurate read on things rather than trying to manufacture a false narrative. The sample size, and the fact that they specifically went after "extremely likely" voters is telling. As before, the revolution will not be televised.

 

[luctor-et-emergo]

This is excellent news, and it absolutely will not be covered by the MSM. This poll does precisely what so-called "mainstream" polls are not supposed to do, seek out a more accurate read on things rather than trying to manufacture a false narrative. The sample size, and the fact that they specifically went after "extremely likely" voters is telling. As before, the revolution will not be televised.

Yeah exactly. I tried using google news and regular google to find other mentions of this poll, so far haven't found any. It is encouraging however that apparently VERY likely voters (those that voted in the past 3-4 primaries) are massively picking Rand. This only shows how crappy MSM polls actually are. It's only a small stretch to say the MSM does several polls and then cherry-picks the poll they like best to report on.

 

[philipped]

Some are arguing this poll is fake, but under the premise it is real, then this shows we gotta keep slugging it out. No Straw Poll for anyone to take next month so whoever can get that ground game is taking it. Who else still in Iowa has 99 chairman tho? #StandWithRand

 

[jaymur]

Paul at 21% and Cruz at 15% those aren't really that close

[TABLE="width: 196"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 133, bgcolor: transparent"] Donald J Trump[/TD]
[TD="width: 64, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]956[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, width: 64, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]41%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Rand Paul[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]482[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]21%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Ted Cruz[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]341[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]15%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Dr. Ben Carson[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]210[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]9%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Marco Rubio[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]150[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]6%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Chris Christie[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]2%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Mike Huckabee[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]49[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]2%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Jeb Bush[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]31[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]1%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Carly Fiorina[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]24[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]1%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]George Pataki[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]18[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]1%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]Lindsay Graham[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]10[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]0%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]None of the above[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]2[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]0%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent"]John Kasich[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]1[/TD]
[TD="class: xl63, bgcolor: transparent, align: right"]0%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[hells_unicorn]

Some are arguing this poll is fake, but under the premise it is real, then this shows we gotta keep slugging it out. No Straw Poll for anyone to take next month so whoever can get that ground game is taking it. Who else still in Iowa has 99 chairman tho? #StandWithRand

People arguing that the poll is fake are doing so under the auspice that it isn't being covered by the MSM and diverges from the "official" narrative. I'm not sure how accurate this poll may be since polling, even with a heavily vetted sample, is not an exact science, but I don't see any reason to doubt the veracity of the method employed or that it actually happened apart from the fact that the MSM isn't covering it and that the "official" pollsters weren't involved.

Frankly I'm more prone to believe the results of this poll precisely because the MSM and big polling companies aren't endorsing it.

 

[CPUd]

Have any of you read the other "articles" on that site?

 

[Jan2017]

Well I'd hope it is not fake - over 2400 respondents !
And not full of alot of BS questions like the Quinni polls, which make ya' wonder who is gonna be staying on the landline answering a hundred questions ?
College kids coming home for the holidays telling their family peers that liberty movement is still the best solution . . .



.

 

[brandon]

This your first week on the internet guys?

 

[messana]

It's the same website that fooled people into thinking Jeb would drop out a month ago.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...p-out-Monday&p=6023419&viewfull=1#post6023419

 

[Voluntarist]

xxxxx

 

[Brett85]

So the entire poll is fake?

 

[RPES1]

This is excellent news, and it absolutely will not be covered by the MSM. This poll does precisely what so-called "mainstream" polls are not supposed to do, seek out a more accurate read on things rather than trying to manufacture a false narrative. The sample size, and the fact that they specifically went after "extremely likely" voters is telling. As before, the revolution will not be televised.

LOL. You crack me up man.

 

[Anti Federalist]

So the entire poll is fake?

Who the hell knows, the disinfo sites are worse than The Onion.

Satire is one thing, straight up false news is another.

 

[Jan2017]

It's the same website that fooled people into thinking Jeb would drop out a month ago.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...p-out-Monday&p=6023419&viewfull=1#post6023419

They seemed accurate with the Jebby! campaign person getting fired from a $12,000/month job and staff paycuts . . . but maybe not (?)
So not so much a news disinformation site as I'd consider The Onion - but I dunno.

Not mainstream media - but an upstart blogger perhaps . . . as long as they actually found 2400 Iowans and only one voted for Kasich - lol

 

[moraha]

Who cares...let people think it's real. Most people are a bunch of sheep so if they see Rand up there, they'll look into him and may finally realize that he's the best one to vote for.

I'm all for flooding the internet with fake poll numbers if that works. Lol

 

[William Tell]

Have any of you read the other "articles" on that site?

Yes. Stop spreading it people.