Neocon Total Freak-Out Panic Attack

[AuH20]

This is what makes voting for Trump okay. Neocons hate him as much as they hate Ron Paul. Trump is a billionaire and has a great shot at winning. Ron was always on an educational mission.

Ron was too gentlemanly to ever engage in a political war of this size. Trump is fighting three different fronts at once and he's held his ground.

 

[AuH20]

The irony just doesn't get any thicker than this.

Have you ever in your life typed anything that didn't leave you wide open to the classic retort, 'I know you are, but what am I?'

'Ricky Vaughn' is addressing Stuart Stevens, one of the architects of the Chris McDaniel smear campaign which resulted in the election of GOP old-timer Thad Cochrane.

 

[acptulsa]

Yes, yes. Every con game that's worth a damn is overloaded with complexity, so the mark can get lost in the convolutions and lose sight of the obvious. However...

“People often associate complexity with deeper meaning, when often after precious time has been lost, it is realized that simplicity is the key to everything.” ― Gary Hopkins

 

[AuH20]

What about party unity that they have been blabbing about for decades?

 

[enhanced_deficit]

When was the last time America had a President who was not funded/bought out by money baggers/lobbies ?

That could be a threatening concept for those used to buy politicians.

 

[thoughtomator]

When was the last time America had a President who was not funded/bought out by money baggers/lobbies ?

That could be a threatening concept for those used to buy politicians.

JFK. They murdered him.

 

[acptulsa]

Nationalist vs. Globalists.

Do you not know which side you're on? Or are you just paid not to reveal which side you're on?

'The important thing to consider is that more and more there is an interdependence of world economies. No one can afford to be isolationist any more. Keep your focus global. Globalization has torn down the barriers that have formerly separated the national from the international markets.'--Source: Never Give Up, by Donald Trump, p.158 , Jan 18, 2008

To borrow a phrase, this is too easy.

 

[Fivezeroes]

JFK. They murdered him.

The magic bullet might make another appearance.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

Do you not know which side you're on? Or are you just paid not to reveal which side you're on?

To borrow a phrase, this is too easy.

It's easy to notice Trump is pro-trade, nationally and internationally as per the quote. That doesn't mean he is pro-MANAGED trade as controlled by globalist bureaucracies, like the WTO or TPP, that de-prioritizes American interests.

 

[otherone]

Nor were the Fascists and the Communists, but they did everyone else a favor and beat the living crap out of each other.

There was an awful amount of collateral crap in that particular shit storm, Randy.

 

[AuH20]

Give me more Trump.

http://www.infowars.com/bankers-council-on-foreign-relations-launch-tirade-against-donald-trump/

Benn Steil, a Senior Fellow and Director of International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations, and Max Boot, a leading neocon and the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow for National Security Studies at the CFR, attacked Trump on the pages of The Weekly Standard over the weekend.

After claiming Trump “is prepared to abrogate America’s commitments” to globalist trade deals and pointing to his vociferous opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal, Steil and Boot lay out what they consider Trump’s disastrous plan for America. The CFR duo is particularly concerned about Trump’s plan to reduce troop numbers overseas and his criticism of autocratic regimes supported by the United States.

“Trump has already done considerable damage to America’s reputation with his crude, bombastic, and often ugly rhetoric. American standing, as measured both in ‘soft power’ and more traditional realpolitik terms, would suffer far more if he were to become commander in chief,” Steil and Boot write. “A Trump presidency threatens the post-World War II liberal international order that American presidents of both parties have so laboriously built up—an order based on free trade and alliances with other democracies.” [IN LAYMAN'S TERMS --- WE HAVE BROKERED MANY VERBAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH THESE FOREIGNERS THAT AMERICANS SHOULD NOT CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH. WE BROKE UP & SOLD THE FARM, BUT THE MUNDANES CAN SHOULDER THE LOAD OF THE SHARED SACRIFICE GOING FORWARD]

It remains to be seen what the financial elite can do to derail Trump. Articles published in newspapers and magazines read primarily by the elite and their minions will not change the situation.

 

[acptulsa]

It's easy to notice Trump is pro-trade, nationally and internationally as per the quote. That doesn't mean he is pro-MANAGED trade as controlled by globalist bureaucracies, like the WTO or TPP, that de-prioritizes American interests.

Give me more Trump.

http://www.infowars.com/bankers-council-on-foreign-relations-launch-tirade-against-donald-trump/

OK. Here's your anti-managed-globalization champion advocating more global intervention and more managed international trade. Enjoy!

 

[AuH20]

Yes, but stop acting surprised.

John Nolte ‏@NolteNC 2h2 hours ago North Carolina, USA
You see how the Establishment is rising up to destroy Trump?

They never did this to Obama, won't do it to Hillary.

GOP sucks.

 

[acptulsa]

Yes, but stop acting surprised.

They will--at just about the same moment that you stop acting like them giving him free publicity 24/7 is an activity calculated to destroy his candidacy.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

OK. Here's your anti-managed-globalization champion advocating more global intervention and more managed international trade. Enjoy!

Enjoy the rebuttal. What Trump is complaining about in the video are the RESULTS of managed trade and globalization that had already kicked in during the '90's, at the expense of the American interest. NAFTA, GATT only accelerated the trend in the '90s going forward.

They will--at just about the same moment that you stop acting like them giving him free publicity 24/7 is an activity calculated to destroy his candidacy.

As pointed out before, it wasn't 'free.' Trump's thirty years of branding and charismatic presence objectively brought value and ratings to the campaign coverage, assets that he traded for all the media time.

 

[acptulsa]

Enjoy the rebuttal. What Trump is complaining about in the video are the RESULTS of managed trade and globalization that had already kicked in during the '90's, at the expense of the American interest. NAFTA, GATT only accelerated the trend in the '90s going forward.

The cure for that which Ron Paul suggested was an end to globalization. What cure is Trump suggesting here? Imperialism.

Hardly the suggestion of an anti-globalist.

As pointed out before, it wasn't 'free.' Trump's thirty years of branding and charismatic presence objectively brought value and ratings to the campaign coverage, assets that he traded for all the media time.

As pointed out before, Ron Paul was a politician, and was blacked out, and Mel Gibson was a far greater celebrity than Trump, and was blacked out.

So, is a celebrity-turned-politician immune? I guess if the media ever blocks one of those out, we'll see. But in the meantime, I say the media made Trump a celebrity, and what the media giveth the media can taketh away.

 

[seapilot]

As pointed out before, Ron Paul was a politician, and was blacked out, and Mel Gibson was a far greater celebrity than Trump, and was blacked out.

So, is a celebrity-turned-politician immune? I guess if the media ever blocks one of those out, we'll see. But in the meantime, I say the media made Trump a celebrity, and what the media giveth the media can taketh away.

I do not think a celebrity-turned politician is immune. An observation is the difference is he is a billionaire? Ron Paul was blacked out until he became a threat. Then they pulled out the ghost letters and called him a racist. More air time, but negative. If Rand became a threat like Trump is now, the media would have started bringing out skeletons and parading them 24/7.

The media has two options for control a candidate. Black out or Negative media to destroy popularity.

Trump is getting massive amount of media time, but most of it is negative. The media sets the narrative but its not working like it always has. Every article is Hitler, Racist or KKK etc. It could all be true, but it is not working this time because any trust in media telling the truth is gone. Its too late to Black out Trump now.

 

[Dr.3D]

Rabbit who likes the brier patch.: Oh please Mr. farmer, don't throw me in the brier patch, anything but that.

Neocons who like Trump.: Oh please voters, don't vote for Trump, anything but that.

Sounds about right.

 

[bubbleboy]

Did Ron Paul turn away from Trump after he said that we need to audit the Fed? If so I'm deeply hurt.

 

[AuH20]

Neo nuttiness.