LibertyEagle
Paleoconservative
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 52,730
Soros is pro-centralized gov(new world order as you like to call it), Paul is totally opposed. This is the major difference.
ROFL. That is a mighty big difference there. Soros' goal stands against every single principle our country was founded upon.
Any government we were to have was supposed to be close to us, so that we could easily keep watch over it and change it, if it got out of hand. However, most of the decisions were to be left up to us. ie. individual liberty. Paul is trying to reinstate the Constitution and work towards reducing the federal government's span of control down to its constitutional levels. Paul's presidency will only be one of many that it would take to get it done, but he would move us in the right direction for the first time in a very long time.
So, Paul is all about reducing the stranglehold of the federal government and return those decisions to the states and the People. Soros' goal is to go in the completely opposite direction. He wants GLOBAL government.
See the problem?
This is why traditional conservatives hate Soros and it is for good reason.
Last edited: