To those interested in understanding Soros and where he`s coming from in regards to economic views; here is him at a recent appearance at the Cato institute. You`d be surprised to find out he`s free market oriented but doesn`t believe in absolutism when it comes to that.
Where government should step in, whether it`s local government or federal was always very hard question to answer for everyone. Ayn Rand for example, believed there ought to be some courts and police. Some even went against the idea of having public courts and police. There is a level of government and law regulation that is highly debatable. My personal views are even more to the right, because I think a private police and multiple police forces would be better than a state police because one should be able to buy protection from where he wants and a good price.
I personally think private sector can handle everything better than the government. Top private universities such as Harvard are proof of that. Also, competitive companies from capitalist world vs crap products from communist world is also proof of that to certain degree.
Question is where you draw the line and I think it`s very interesting and valid question to ask.
Soros is libertarian at heart but was always open to the idea of regulations. He said when comparing himself to Jim Rogers(which most libertarians and conservatives love) that major difference between him and Rogers is that Rogers thinks we can`t be wrong in our view of the market, while he thinks we can always be wrong because we are not perfect and thus our assessments can be wrong. Ron Paul himself said a few times he`s not an absolutist. Ron Paul would not end all financial aid for people because he knows many are hooked on it like junkies and would try a transition phase.
Soros is a strong believer in ones imperfections. He believes one can always be wrong no matter how strong the convictions. He sees that as a source of total liberty, the idea that you have too look upon yourself as a individual prone to mistakes. Single mindedness leads to less freedom because it puts you in a cage of your own making.
I`m a small hedge fund manager and have read a few books on him, which is more than some who`ve only watched some youtube neocon fear-mongering propaganda videos coming from Glenn Beck and other such puppets can claim.
Here is Soros talking recently at the libertarian Cato institute. If you want a quick glimpse of where Soros` coming from, I suggest watching from min 29:30. His closing statement is most interesting and shows his true intention:
p.s: Yes, I know video was posted in 1st post but most who commented so far haven`t bothered to check it out.
Where government should step in, whether it`s local government or federal was always very hard question to answer for everyone. Ayn Rand for example, believed there ought to be some courts and police. Some even went against the idea of having public courts and police. There is a level of government and law regulation that is highly debatable. My personal views are even more to the right, because I think a private police and multiple police forces would be better than a state police because one should be able to buy protection from where he wants and a good price.
I personally think private sector can handle everything better than the government. Top private universities such as Harvard are proof of that. Also, competitive companies from capitalist world vs crap products from communist world is also proof of that to certain degree.
Question is where you draw the line and I think it`s very interesting and valid question to ask.
Soros is libertarian at heart but was always open to the idea of regulations. He said when comparing himself to Jim Rogers(which most libertarians and conservatives love) that major difference between him and Rogers is that Rogers thinks we can`t be wrong in our view of the market, while he thinks we can always be wrong because we are not perfect and thus our assessments can be wrong. Ron Paul himself said a few times he`s not an absolutist. Ron Paul would not end all financial aid for people because he knows many are hooked on it like junkies and would try a transition phase.
Soros is a strong believer in ones imperfections. He believes one can always be wrong no matter how strong the convictions. He sees that as a source of total liberty, the idea that you have too look upon yourself as a individual prone to mistakes. Single mindedness leads to less freedom because it puts you in a cage of your own making.
I`m a small hedge fund manager and have read a few books on him, which is more than some who`ve only watched some youtube neocon fear-mongering propaganda videos coming from Glenn Beck and other such puppets can claim.
Here is Soros talking recently at the libertarian Cato institute. If you want a quick glimpse of where Soros` coming from, I suggest watching from min 29:30. His closing statement is most interesting and shows his true intention:
"Those of us who are concerned with protecting individual liberty should work together to restore the standards of political
discourse that used to enable democracy to function better."
p.s: Yes, I know video was posted in 1st post but most who commented so far haven`t bothered to check it out.
Last edited: