NATO Raid Kills Qaddafi's Son, Khamis and 32 Others In Zliten Libyan Rebels Say

[HOLLYWOOD]

The latest from the "NO-FLY-ZONE"
NATO Raid Kills Qaddafi's Son, Libyan Rebels Say

ZLITEN, Libya – Libyan rebels said Friday that a NATO night raid in the western town of Zliten killed Muammar Qaddafi's son Khamis Qaddafi and 32 others.

Mohammed Zawawi, a spokesman for the rebel groups, told AFP that Khamis Qaddafi was confirmed to be among the dead, citing spies operating within Libyan government forces.
There was no confirmation of Khamis Qaddafi's death from NATO or Mummar Qaddafi's regime.

Khamis Qaddafi, a soldier who leads one of the country's elite battalions, was also reported to have been killed in a March air strike -- but again his death was not confirmed.

NATO Probes Reports Youngest Son of Qaddafi Was Killed in Libya Air Raid
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-of-qaddafi-was-killed-in-libya-air-raid.html
By Patrick Donahue and Mariam Fam - Aug 5, 2011 4:56 AM PT

NATO is looking into reports that a son of Muammar Qaddafi died in the Libyan town of Zlitan, where the alliance struck two targets yesterday. A government spokesman denied he’d been killed, Al Arabiya television said.
The information minister of the Libyan rebels’ National Transitional Council, Mahmoud Shammam, said its forces had unconfirmed reports that Khamis Qaddafi died in a raid on Zlitan, about 50 kilometers (30 miles) west of the rebel-held port city of Misrata on the Mediterranean coast.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization aircraft hit an ammunition storage area and a military-police facility late yesterday in Zlitan, the alliance said in an e-mailed statement from mission headquarters in Naples, Italy. Pro- and anti- Qaddafi forces have been battling for control of the town as the rebels seek to advance toward the capital, Tripoli.
“NATO does not target individuals and takes all allegations about civilian casualties very seriously,” NATO said. “We are looking into it, as we always do.”
Khamis Qaddafi, the youngest son of the Libyan leader, commands the government’s elite 32nd brigade, which the U.S. military said in March had as many as 10,000 soldiers, possessed some of the best equipment and acted as the “primary regime protection element.”
Initial Assault

Part of the initial NATO missile assault on Qaddafi’s forces in March was focused on Khamis’s military unit. NATO has targeted the brigade’s headquarters south of Tripoli, while rebels accuse it of carrying out several assaults on Misrata.
Previous reports of Khamis Qaddafi’s death went unsubstantiated. Qaddafi’s son was one of 33 members of the government forces killed in an early-morning NATO raid, the Associated Press reported, citing a rebel spokesman.
Shammam, speaking by phone from an undisclosed location outside of Libya, said that although there was a “strong feeling” among rebels that Qaddafi’s son had been killed, “nobody has seen the body; nobody has seen the actual scene.”
The Libyan government has said that an April 30 NATO raid killed another Qaddafi son, Saif al-Arab, as well as three grandchildren. Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi later called that statement into question, citing intelligence reports.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Patrick Donahue in Berlin at [email protected]; Mariam Fam in Cairo at [email protected]

​

​

 

[galantarie]

Not true. Khamis is alive and kicking. That was a propaganda stunt pulled by the TREBELS (new dictionary word= Terrorist so called "rebels").

Watch his video today:
[video]https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=230796673622680&oid=151025638289161[/video]

Khamis visiting the hospitals:




But in Zlitan, 88 civilians were killed yesterday!

 

[galantarie]

The Libyan officials respond to the meanness and lies in some newspapers and media Khamis Muammar Gaddafi, these officials explain that these liars with the complicity of NATO have invented the story to divert the attention of international opinion on the heinous crimes committed by the Nato bombing in the house of Mustafa ElMrabat the 04-08-2011which caused the death of his wife and two children aged 3 and 5 years old and seriously injuring several others---

 

[galantarie]

 

[galantarie]

 

[galantarie]

 

[galantarie]

 

[galantarie]

Revised Video:

 

[galantarie]

BENGAZI isincapable of anything---much less be a "legitimate" regime!

 

[galantarie]

A few year ago, Ron Paul proposed the to dissolve NATO.

There is now a movement for this:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/214732101909853/

Dissolving of NATO -salvation for the world

We invite all to join this movement.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/214732101909853/

 

[Bruno]

Is this the same son that has been killed twice and still showing up alive?

Bet that really pisses of our government.

 

[lucky_bg]

You should watch this video!



You can advertise your FB group here...

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Suppo...-the-people-of-Serbia/143360419060495?sk=wall

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

NATO Air Strikes In Libya Kill 82 Civilians (33 Children)

Very Impressive video/info, thanx lucky

Here's more sad news reported by REUTERS NATO kills 82 civilians: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/10/us-libya-idUSTRE76Q76620110810

Tripoli says NATO strike kills dozens of civilians


Libyan TV airs Khamis video

By Missy Ryan
ZLITAN, Libya | Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:31pm EDT

(Reuters) - Libyan officials said on Tuesday dozens of civilians had been killed in a NATO strike on a cluster of farmhouses east of Tripoli, but the alliance said it hit a legitimate military target.
A strike causing large numbers of civilian casualties could undermine support in some NATO nations for a campaign to oust Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi that has proved much longer, bloodier and more costly than its backers had expected.
A spokesman for Gaddafi's government, who took foreign reporters to the scene of the strike, said 85 people had been killed when missiles struck farm compounds in the village of Majar, about 150 km (90 miles) east of Tripoli.

He said the dead were 33 children, 32 women and 20 men.

Standing on a pile of rubble, Moussa Ibrahim told reporters: "This is a crime beyond imagination. Everything about this place is civilian."
There was no evidence of weaponry at the farmhouses but neither was there immediately visible blood or body parts.
Government officials provided footage that appeared to show men combing through the rubble at one of the bomb sites at night retrieving human remains, including the bodies of two children.

This correspondent, taken to the hospital in Zlitan by Libyan government officials, counted 20 body bags in one area, some of them stacked one on top of the other.
Most of the dead at the Zlitan hospital appeared to be men but some were children. Medical workers opened some of the body bags. One contained the body of a child who appeared to be about two years old. Another had inside the remains of a child.

In total, reporters saw about 30 bodies at the Zlitan hospital. Officials said the rest of the people killed in the air strike had been taken to other hospitals, but Reuters was unable to verify that information independently.
Hundreds of men also attended a burial in Majar, carrying a parade of simple wooden coffins, draped with flags.
"They (NATO) do not differentiate between soldiers, children and old people," said Abdulkader Al-Hawali, a fifth-year medical student at the hospital in Zlitan.
At a news conference in Brussels, a NATO military spokesman said the target of the strikes was a military staging area which was being used to support government attacks on civilians.

"This was a legitimate target and by striking it NATO has reduced the pro-Gaddafi forces' ability to threaten and attack civilians," Colonel Roland Lavoie told a regular briefing.
"We do not have evidence of civilian casualties at this stage, although casualties among military personnel, including mercenaries, are very likely due to the nature of the target."
NATO forces have been mounting regular attacks, from both sea and air, on targets around Zlitan, where the alliance says government forces are killing and persecuting civilians who are trying to end his 41-year rule.

Gaddafi has denied attacking civilians, and says the NATO bombing campaign is an act of colonial aggression aimed at stealing Libya's plentiful oil.
Libya's conflict began in February when thousands of people protested against Gaddafi.
Western powers say the Libyan leader must relinquish power but despite months of pounding by NATO bombs, defections from his inner circle and international sanctions, Gaddafi is showing no signs of wanting to quit.

In an effort to tighten the noose, the European Union is set this week to widen sanctions by adding a Libyan oil firm and a government administrative department to a blacklist, bringing to 49 the number of Libyan entities targeted by EU sanctions.
"These measures show the determination of the international community in maintaining the isolation of the regime in Tripoli," the French Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
Power and petrol shortages have been worsening in Gaddafi's Tripoli stronghold, deepening public frustration.

NATO said Tuesday its warplanes had also bombed a Libyan warship docked in Tripoli after observing that weapons were being taken from it that were expected to be used in attacks.

REBEL RESHUFFLE
Gaddafi's rebel opponents, meanwhile, are struggling to advance toward Tripoli and their administration in the eastern city of Benghazi was rocked by the assassination last month of the rebel military chief.

Mustafa Abdel Jalil, leader of the rebel National Transitional Council, dismissed the council's executive arm on Monday in what analysts said was an effort to restore the opposition's credibility.

If confirmed, the casualties in the village of Majar would not be the first time that NATO activity in Libya has resulted in civilian deaths.

In June, NATO admitted it destroyed a house in Tripoli in which Libyan officials said nine civilians were killed. The alliance blamed a missile malfunction.

Shortly afterwards, the Libyan government reported almost 20 people were killed in a strike on the home of a member of Libya's 12-strong Revolutionary Command Council, led by Gaddafi.

Libyan officials say hundreds of civilians have been killed since the NATO bombing campaign began. But in most cases they have not supplied firm proof while in some instances the evidence provided has been contradictory.

(Additional reporting by Hamid Ould in Algiers, Joseph Nasr in Berline, and David Brunnstrom in Brussels; Writing by Christian Lowe; Editing by Giles Elgood and Janet Lawrence)

 

[galantarie]

The part I see prophetic above, was:

Unfortunately, as with most bureaucracies, the end of NATO’s mission did not mean the end of NATO. Instead, heads of NATO member states gathered in 1999 desperately attempting to devise new missions for the outdated and adrift alliance. This is where NATO moved from being a defensive alliance respecting the sovereignty of its members to an offensive and interventionist organization, concerned now with "economic, social and political difficulties...ethnic and religious rivalries, territorial disputes, inadequate or failed efforts at reform, the abuse of human rights, and the dissolution of states," in the words of the Washington 1999 Summit.

And we saw the fruits of this new NATO mission in the former Yugoslavia, where the US, through NATO, attacked a sovereign state that threatened neither the United States nor its own neighbors. In Yugoslavia, NATO abandoned the claim it once had to the moral high ground. The result of the illegal and immoral NATO intervention in the Balkans speaks for itself: NATO troops will occupy the Balkans for the foreseeable future. No peace has been attained, merely the cessation of hostilities and a permanent dependency on US foreign aid.

The further expansion of NATO is in reality a cover for increased US interventionism in Europe and beyond. It will be a conduit for more unconstitutional US foreign aid and US interference in the internal politics of member nations, especially the new members from the former East."...

NOW IT IS MORE THAN SEVEN YEARS LATER!!! and what he said has certainly become a disasterous world reality!

Fridrich Hláva writes concerning RON PAUL:
The establishemnt of USA made shurly everything to silent him- a real prophet of his nation!!



Ron Paul proposes removing all our troops from bases around the world...
http://www.ronpaullibrary.​org/document.php?id=606
(QUOTE):

HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 30, 2004

Don't Expand NATO!

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this resolution. I do so because further expansion of NATO, an outdated alliance, is not in our national interest and may well constitute a threat to our national security in the future.

More than 50 years ago the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed to defend Western Europe and the United States against attack from the communist nations of Eastern Europe. It was an alliance of sovereign nations bound together in common purpose - for mutual defense. The deterrence value of NATO helped kept the peace throughout the Cold War. In short, NATO achieved its stated mission. With the fall of the Soviet system and the accompanying disappearance of the threat of attack, in 1989-1991, NATO’s reason to exist ceased. Unfortunately, as with most bureaucracies, the end of NATO’s mission did not mean the end of NATO. Instead, heads of NATO member states gathered in 1999 desperately attempting to devise new missions for the outdated and adrift alliance. This is where NATO moved from being a defensive alliance respecting the sovereignty of its members to an offensive and interventionist organization, concerned now with "economic, social and political difficulties...ethnic and religious rivalries, territorial disputes, inadequate or failed efforts at reform, the abuse of human rights, and the dissolution of states," in the words of the Washington 1999 Summit.

And we saw the fruits of this new NATO mission in the former Yugoslavia, where the US, through NATO, attacked a sovereign state that threatened neither the United States nor its own neighbors. In Yugoslavia, NATO abandoned the claim it once had to the moral high ground. The result of the illegal and immoral NATO intervention in the Balkans speaks for itself: NATO troops will occupy the Balkans for the foreseeable future. No peace has been attained, merely the cessation of hostilities and a permanent dependency on US foreign aid.

The further expansion of NATO is in reality a cover for increased US interventionism in Europe and beyond. It will be a conduit for more unconstitutional US foreign aid and US interference in the internal politics of member nations, especially the new members from the former East.

It will also mean more corporate welfare at home. As we know, NATO membership demands a minimum level of military spending of its member states. For NATO’s new members, the burden of significantly increased military spending when there are no longer external threats is hard to meet. Unfortunately, this is where the US government steps in, offering aid and subsidized loans to these members so they can purchase more unneeded and unnecessary military equipment. In short, it is nothing more than corporate welfare for the US military industrial complex.

The expansion of NATO to these seven countries, we have heard, will open them up to the further expansion of US military bases, right up to the border of the former Soviet Union. Does no one worry that this continued provocation of Russia might have negative effects in the future? Is it necessary?

Further, this legislation encourages the accession of Albania, Macedonia, and Croatia - nations that not long ago were mired in civil and regional wars. The promise of US military assistance if any of these states are attacked is obviously a foolhardy one. What will the mutual defense obligations we are entering into mean if two Balkan NATO members begin hostilities against each other (again)?

In conclusion, we should not be wasting US tax money and taking on more military obligations expanding NATO. The alliance is a relic of the Cold War, a hold-over from another time, an anachronism. It should be disbanded, the sooner the better.

(END OF QUOTE)
ronpaullibrary.org
domains.googlesyndication.com

 

[galantarie]

NATO bombs civilian airport and city of Sabha. There is no electrical power, water or goods for three days now. Animals and humans are dying

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

Keep in mind this is a UK report and most British papers have shown prejudice, with that grain of salt, read the absolute "NATO" bullshit statements contained in this article.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...armed-over-rising-civilian-toll-in-Libya.html
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon alarmed over rising civilian toll in Libya

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon voiced alarm on Thursday over recent reports of civilians killed in Libya's civil war and called on all sides to do as much as possible to avoid killing innocent people.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Photo: AP 6:28AM BST 12 Aug 2011

The Secretary-General is deeply concerned by reports of the unacceptably large number of civilian casualties as a result of the conflict in Libya," Ban's press office said in a statement.

"The Secretary-General calls on all parties to exercise extreme caution in their actions, in order to minimise any further loss of civilian life," the statement said.

Earlier, the U.N. said Ban had spoken with Libyan Prime Minister Baghdadi al-Mahmudi on Wednesday, expressing his concerns about civilian casualties and the "absolute lack of progress in the efforts to find a politically negotiated solution to the crisis in Libya."

In his latest statement, Ban said "there can be no military solution to the Libyan crisis." He called on both sides to respond to ideas for a settlement put to them by his envoy for Libya, Abdel Elah al-Khatib.

Earlier this week, Russia, India, Brazil and other U.N. Security Council delegations voiced concerns about NATO strikes on Libyan state television last month and other attacks that have allegedly killed civilians.

Irina Bokova, head of the U.N. cultural agency UNESCO, sharply rebuked NATO on Monday for the attack on Libyan television, which she said killed several people and wounded nearly a dozen.

"I deplore the NATO strike on Al-Jamahiriya and its installations," Bokova said in a statement. "Media outlets should not be targeted in military actions."

NATO said last month it had bombed three ground-based satellite transmission dishes in Tripoli to silence "terror broadcasts" on state television by Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi during the uprising against his rule.


NATO defended the strikes and said it had no evidence anyone had been killed as a result of them. <===

 

[galantarie]

07 AUGUST 2010

WORDS of Our Brother-Leader on World peace and Nuclear Disarmament

There is a lot of talk about the maintenance of world peace, preventing wars and saving the peoples from their scourge. If there is any truth to such talk, if it is not mere hypocrisy or the well-known electioneering propaganda, certain practical steps need to be agreed upon and implemented by the whole world. Foremost among those is the complete elimination of weapons of mass destruction; not the partial or gradual elimination but the complete one. This matter may be addressed in more detail in a future essay. However, seas are the topic of this essay. If we are serious about the maintenance of world peace, we must have the courage to take the following, simple step. Namely, to ensure that no military fleets are present in the inland seas and gulfs except those that belong to the littoral states. *1 By that I mean the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Red Sea and the Arab-Persian Gulf.

If we are serious about building peace, if we take a genuine interest in peace, we must take this step. Peace us important for the world peoples. Peoples who are the cannon fodder and who die by the millions in wars yearn for peace. Tyrants, dictators and leaders like Hitler may not share that burning desire for peace.

The UN must adopt this proposal. Certain arrogant powers threaten the peace of the world, are inimical to the welfare of peoples and show no interest in their safety and security. All the entities that represent the conscience of the world and care for the safety of humanity are called upon to impose this proposal on those powers. They must take all the necessary measures to ban the presence of foreign fleets in inland seas until this becomes a general policy.

If this proposal is not formally adopted, peace-loving forces may find themselves compelled to close the straits of Gibraltar, Dardanelles, Bab El-Mandab Hormuz as well as the Baltic Sea to the foreign military fleets. Only the fleets of the littoral states and the civilian fleets should be allowed to navigate those waters.

*1: This is probable reference to the provocations that the USA made with “military exercises” off the Libyan Mediterranean coast between 1981-1986, which resulted in destruction and bombings of sovereign Libyan lands and properties and the sinking of Libyan vessels and shooting-down of Libyan jets in and over waters designated as belonging to Libya by The American Armed Forces

______________________________________________________________
Qadhafi’s Vision

At a conference on Euro-Arab relations in Tripoli in May 1973, the Leader of the Revolution expounded on the philosophical aspect of the Third Universal Theory and its relationship to national and social liberation. In this speech we see the highly developed awareness of the Revolutionary Muammar Qadhafi and his acute appreciation of the complex inner needs of all the world’s peoples. It is worth recalling his words which are still very relevant to life in the 1990s. He said:

“Humanity now urgently needs a cry of justice which would return it to its senses and to its Creator… We need to go back to God and turn away from evil… Atomic bombs, missiles, biological weapons and aggression can only be the making of the Devil. The ideology we propose to the world is humanitarian but not made by men, nor is it a philosophy, but it is based on truth…. This is Gods law, always one, immortal, and unchangeable, a universal religion of truth which belongs to all mankind. The Third Theory offers an alternative to capitalist materialism and communist atheism and calls for the return of mankind to the Kingdom of God. Mankind was never in greater need to rearm itself with faith than it is now. We all know that all the philosophies and ideologies have failed to disprove the existence of God, and as the truth of His existence is self-evident, it is quite clear that society must be reorganised in every country of the world in accordance with the will of God and the precepts of His Prophets.”



Here we see the philosophical depth of the Third Universal Theory and how it has been drawn from the struggle of the masses for freedom and from the dynamic revolutionary precepts of the Messengers of God.

“The Third Universal Theory, in simple terms, is a comprehensive formulation of the noble principles and moral values sent down from Heaven to the Prophets and Apostles to help guide people on the right path leading to happiness, stability and human tolerance. It is a worldview based on the concepts of justice, righteousness, moral fortitude, and respect for national existence. The Third Universal Theory has answers for the political, military and socio-economic problems facing human communities.

Patre Nostru chì sì in celu, ch'ellu sia sanctficatu u to nome.... ...ma francaci da u male.

 

[galantarie]

 

[galantarie]

 

[galantarie]