Natural Citizen
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Messages
- 16,463
getting bacteria started on mars may require domes at first also... they could later be used by settlers.
it wouldn't require humans on mars to get bacteria started, but it would help.
I think terraforming would be a worthy mars mission, and would make sense for the long term survival of our species.. if such a thing even matters.
There was one heck of a really great discussion on the radio last night discussing this. First hour guest, aerospace engineer Dr. Robert Zubrin reacted to NASA's announcement to send a new rover to Mars in 2020. "We should have a much richer robotic program than just the next rover 8 years from now...and we should be sending humans to Mars in roughly 8-10 years from now," he declared. Zubrin was also critical of NASA's planned L2 space station which could control Mars sample missions and some lunar robotics. "The station at L2...is a way to have something for the human spaceflight program to do without it actually embracing the challenge of going to Mars," he remarked.
Of course, as always, the discussion expanded to a broad scope of relevant outliers. It's probably on youtube some place.
Here's a good video featuring Zubrin if you don't know who he is. It's quite popular with the younger crowd and really reflects what they are learning in terms of science, technology, engineering and math in the classroom. Which is really the only reason I share it here.
It's about 4 minutes.
'The Case for Mars' (ft. Zubrin, Sagan, Cox & Boston)
Last edited:
