Musk Advocates to Double H-1B Visas

Tesla joins top H-1B employers list as Musk pushes for reforms to expand visa program

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst


Tesla joins top H-1B employers list as Musk pushes for reforms to expand visa program

Tesla joins top H-1B employers list as Musk pushes for reforms to expand visa program

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst



Elon Musk's Tesla ranked 16th among top H-1B visa employers in 2024. The company had 742 initial and 1,025 continuing employment petitions approved, reflecting its growing reliance on foreign talent. Musk supports the H-1B visa program, essential for his business success. Major tech firms like Amazon, Cognizant, and Infosys also top the list, maintaining a demand for skilled workers.

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst


Elon Musk's Tesla ranked 16th among top H-1B visa employers in 2024. The company had 742 initial and 1,025 continuing employment petitions approved, reflecting its growing reliance on foreign talent. Musk supports the H-1B visa program, essential for his business success. Major tech firms like Amazon, Cognizant, and Infosys also top the list, maintaining a demand for skilled workers.

Elon Musk's Tesla ranked 16th among top H-1B visa employers in 2024. The company had 742 initial and 1,025 continuing employment petitions approved, reflecting its growing reliance on foreign talent. Musk supports the H-1B visa program, essential for his business success. Major tech firms like Amazon, Cognizant, and Infosys also top the list, maintaining a demand for skilled workers.

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
 
-cambridge analytica enters the chat-


funny thread!

this is how tptw insert topics into the social mediasphere and then use data mining of the "reaction" (create problem>monitor and control reaction>provide solution) to gauge how to present the solution. it's fun watching the hegelian dialectic in real time!



it's a real shame that some people sell their very souls to further it. but that's for a thread that should be buried in an unread subforum, i guess.
 
Last edited:
Yes, as part of his reforms (which were headed towards eliminating the program) Trump issued rules requiring better pay for them so that the incentive to import them for cheap labor would be reduced.


Just admit that Trump is a sellout, swamp rat.


https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1874282313313640607





https://x.com/theliamnissan/status/1873386539927183653

 
Last edited:
It's larger than a trickle, and it's aimed strategically at important sectors of society to drive the natives down into the lower classes while elevating foreigners above them.
Reducing it is good but not good enough, they will boil the frog slowly because they moved too fast and we started trying to jump out of the pot.

I think the quota is around 85,000. According to X22, current levels are over 800,000, about 10x what hte law allows. Stop the lawbreaking, and you will have fixed 90% of the problem overnight. The "perfect", in this case, truly is the enemy of the good. By lunging for the "perfect", you are just falling into a Dem tactic. They dangle the carrot, you lunge for it, and back into the manacles the right-wing goes.

We do not need them, and the only people who reap any advantage are the international globalist oligarchs.

Does a basketball team need MVPs? Nobody "needs" new players, you recruit them in order to improve your team. There are a lot of people in the world that we don't need" but from which we will greatly benefit by having them here, instead of over there. Obviously not 800,000/yr., that's just demographic warfare. I don't know the correct cap amount, but we agree there has to be a cap, and it has to be enforced to prevent demographic warfare. But closing the border is just another globalist win condition because a border that can seal people out can seal people in, which Dr. Paul already explicitly warned us about. We really just need to enforce the laws on the books and that will automatically fix 90% of the problem.

When we have sorted out our problems, and that includes a 20+ year immigration freeze, we can let in a literal trickle of immigrants through the basic immigration system, and those people that we let in can then get jobs.

Sure, I get the idea of shifting the Overton window but the problem is that you can't shift the Overton window to the right by promoting Nazism for the simple fact that Nazism is obvious tyranny, and people will automatically (and correctly) reject it, and end up staying where they are. This is why the Left always baits conservatives to go full-Nazi, it's just baiting them into self-cancellation. "Seal the border for 20 years" is tyranny and you're being baited into that message by trained-Marxists who are behind these talking points to make you feel like you're shifting the Overton window hard when, in fact, you've just been duped into self-cancelling.

EDIT NOTE: I'm not suggesting Swordsmyth is promoting Nazism, only that this line of argument fails for the same reason that Nazism fails -- it starts from valid insights (social/cultural degeneration) and then goes to an extreme that is obviously wrong.

If you want foreign workers you can deal with their societies, you don't get to undermine your fellow countrymen.

I agree that there is no "right" for American companies to alter American culture and values, nor act in any way against American interests. So, the constitutional Federal duty to duly regulate immigration logically supersedes all economic considerations. However, those economic considerations are real and so when the immigration policy has been fixed so that the current demographic warfare methods have been made impossible (and hopefully undo some of the damage already done), it is imperative that the Federal government allow economic immigration because that is actually (provably) in American interests. To go against it, is to go against American interests, not just P/L, culturally as well.
 
Last edited:
That's $#@!ed up.

Although Jake Shields has been spitting the Izrael truths so this has been in the works for a while.

I suppose under Elon's Musk new guidelines and rules with the incoming of Trump adimin.
You or anyone cant do any of the following on Twitter/x

Just my observation from this.

1.You can not be critical or criticize Israel or their war against Hamas, Gaza, Hezb etc.
If you criticize Israeli actions your stats on twitter will be demonized and you could lose your account or blue mark.

2.No questions or critical debates on Zionism topic.

3.Criticizing or opposing of H1B positions would make Elon Musk call you a racist.


When it comes to the Isreali thing on twitter it seems there are some Jewish users who arent very happy about the new direction of twitter.
They are right.


What NeoCon clowns are trying to do is to push certain topics on the dark web and that is something they shouldn't allow to happen but unfortunately i see that happening.
 
It was always "Apple gets to decide who gets to immigrate for their own advantage and the disadvantage of American workers while using the imports as slaves because they have to work for Apple or go back", otherwise it wouldn't be a special program, the people would have to use the regular immigration system and then get a job.

I just disagree with this characterization based on personally knowing many H1Bs, especially those from earlier in the program. If you're wealthy and want to immigrate to the US and naturalize, it will be possible for you (as long as you meet the other immigration criteria) because you have enough money to sustain yourself during the (potentially very long) period of economic disruption to your life as the immigration process can make it impossible for quite a bit of time for you to be employed. If you run out of money during that process, you run the risk of failing to naturalize and having to return home, which may be a big waste of time and money for you, as well as your employer who may have invested in you and now you're going back home. That's the problem H1B fixes -- no company wants to invest in an immigre and then have that individual go back to wherever they came from. H1B keeps that investment here. So, it's economically in America's interests for immigre's who move here for economic opportunity and to naturalize, to have a pathway that is designed to regulate that process.

I have every economic interest to oppose H1B. My paycheck will increase by a lot if H1B is shut down. But it's bad for America. I love my country more than I love cash. I want H1Bs to come here, but the system has to be made to actually work in America's interests, period, and to preserve American values and heritage. We cannot be importing hostiles into this country, even under the guise of economic P/L. That we agree on. But your proposed solution is tyrannical and actually damages American interests.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, that doesn't cut it.
And lets just deal with the whole sports team garbage, it been a long psyop to warp winds, the "local team" has absolutely nothing to do with the people there, it's identity theft by billionaires to con the locals into paying for their stadiums and buying their merchandise.
In the old days the players actually came from the town the team was named for, then they started recruiting just a few players from other places, and eventually they now have not a single player from the town.
They are now trying to use the mind warping that they installed in people using sports teams to do the same thing to the country itself, "America" will continue to exist, but nobody of importance in it will be American except for the suckers at the bottom paying for the stadiums and buying the merch.
I'm not a zero immigration extremist, I could allow a much smaller program to prioritize a literal handful of the best and brightest inside very restrictive total immigration caps, but you people are driving me farther towards the extreme, it would be far better to allow zero immigration ever than what you are pushing.

You're overheating -- the sports team is merely an analogy to say "we want the best people here, not over there."

As to the point that America is its people, I 100% agree. That's why a proper role of the Federal government in its constitutional duty to control immigration is to ensure that American interests, values and heritage are preserved and promoted by immigration. And since the system has been abused for decades, there need to be steps taken to undo some of that damage. I don't know what those steps are, but I'm sure smart people can figure them out.

But reactionary tyrannical measures like those you promote only feed the problem and make it worse. As soon as the Dems recover from the Woke insanity and get back into POTUS again, they'll just clap back with hyper-left-tyranny in response to your current MAGA tyranny. You can't fight tyranny with tyranny.

Your side is like the local Greek who showed the Persians the goat path around the pass so the Spartans could be attacked from within as well as without.
After all, if the Spartans were so great they should be able to beat an enemy attacking on the inside and the outside at the same time, right?

Americans do not generally understand or believe we are in a war. If we are in a war, then the President needs to clearly and publicly explain that to the whole country. Obviously, during war, there is no immigration of any kind. But let the enemies be identified, let Congress pass an actual declaration of war (the only constitutionally valid means of authorizing war), and then we close the borders, and so on. In any other condition, we are not in a war, and so Ephialtes showing the Persians the goat path is not a valid metaphor, just over-heated rhetoric.

And none of them were ever better than Americans or needed.

*sigh -- "better than" is not the standard. It's about whether America itself is stronger with those people here, rather than over there. That's the criterion by which immigration must be judged, constitutionally (because the Federal government is obligated by the Constitution to act in American interests).

And they were always depressing the wages of Americans and crowding them out of the industry.

Those kinds of economic dynamics only come into play when there is a flood of immigration as we have had for the past decade+. Otherwise, immigration has mere marginal effects that cannot even be measured. An engineer will earn an engineer's pay whether or not people immigrate into his field if there are realistic caps and they are actually enforced. So the problem is that the laws on the books are not being obeyed. Probably half of all the major problems plaguing this country today could be fixed overnight simply by enforcing the laws already on the books.

1 this is an original MAGA issue and one that is a winning issue for us.

I recall that MAGA lost in 2020 and couldn't win again until after 4 years of sleepy Joe. Pride cometh before a fall, don't think you're more secure than you actually are. Do you think TheCount considers his side to be beaten? He's just waiting for the next cycle and there can be no doubt they will have organized the maximally destructive assault against MAGA that they can possibly rouse, by that time.

2 if this is not dealt with severely and swiftly, even at the (incorrectly) theorized short term cost it will result in an irreversible long term destruction of any hope for MAGA and America, this is a battle we have no choice about fighting, it is a hill to die on.

And enforcing the laws on the books, cutting the flow by 90%, is an unworkably bad solution??

Maintaining our national boundaries is not and never will be tyranny.
These people are not Americans and they have no right to come here.

Of course maintaining the borders is not tyranny. And my argument is not about sympathy for foreigners... these people are already middle-class otherwise, they wouldn't be able to afford university education back home. We want to poach the best from other countries, plain and simple. That's how you make America not only great, but greater. And a lot of that is about pipelining their youth here. India is more Westernized than most Americans realize. We don't want the ones that are part of their old political establishment which is socialist to the core, but that's just a percentage, and they can be filtered out through immigration interviews, etc. Most of them are as Western as any Brit and many of them are a good deal more conservative. That's the part that the current MAGA discussion is totally overlooking. I can't speak for today's H1Bs, but the early H1Bs were significantly more conservative than the average American. We want a pipeline of those people coming here because it will make us stronger, and deplete those people from overseas, weakening our potential enemies from what they would otherwise be.
 
I think the quota is around 85,000. According to X22, current levels are over 800,000, about 10x what hte law allows. Stop the lawbreaking, and you will have fixed 90% of the problem overnight. The "perfect", in this case, truly is the enemy of the good. By lunging for the "perfect", you are just falling into a Dem tactic. They dangle the carrot, you lunge for it, and back into the manacles the right-wing goes.



Does a basketball team need MVPs? Nobody "needs" new players, you recruit them in order to improve your team. There are a lot of people in the world that we don't need" but from which we will greatly benefit by having them here, instead of over there. Obviously not 800,000/yr., that's just demographic warfare. I don't know the correct cap amount, but we agree there has to be a cap, and it has to be enforced to prevent demographic warfare. But closing the border is just another globalist win condition because a border that can seal people out can seal people in, which Dr. Paul already explicitly warned us about. We really just need to enforce the laws on the books and that will automatically fix 90% of the problem.



Sure, I get the idea of shifting the Overton window but the problem is that you can't shift the Overton window to the right by promoting Nazism for the simple fact that Nazism is obvious tyranny, and people will automatically (and correctly) reject it, and end up staying where they are. This is why the Left always baits conservatives to go full-Nazi, it's just baiting them into self-cancellation. "Seal the border for 20 years" is tyranny and you're being baited into that message by trained-Marxists who are behind these talking points to make you feel like you're shifting the Overton window hard when, in fact, you've just been duped into self-cancelling.



I agree that there is no "right" for American companies to alter American culture and values, nor act in any way against American interests. So, the constitutional Federal duty to duly regulate immigration logically supersedes all economic considerations. However, those economic considerations are real and so when the immigration policy has been fixed so that the current demographic warfare methods have been made impossible (and hopefully undo some of the damage already done), it is imperative that the Federal government allow economic immigration because that is actually (provably) in American interests. To go against it, is to go against American interests, not just P/L, culturally as well.
We have one of the largest and smartest populations on the planet, we don't need MVPs from abroad, we need to reward and grow our own.

Nobody is promoting NAZI ideology and you insult our intelligence by claiming anyone is.
An immigration freeze is not tyranny and it is required to sort out the invasion and disruption that has been unleashed for multiple generations now.

Economic immigration is not in America's interests, and any that may not be harmful can be handled through the regular immigration quota without special programs to allow international corporations to target American workers to be undermined.
Anything else required can be handled on a very limited and TEMPORARY basis, if a Taiwanese company is going to set up a chip factory here we can allow them to send their engineers for a few years to train their American replacements and then go home.
 
I recall that MAGA lost in 2020 and couldn't win again until after 4 years of sleepy Joe. Pride cometh before a fall, don't think you're more secure than you actually are. Do you think TheCount considers his side to be beaten? He's just waiting for the next cycle and there can be no doubt they will have organized the maximally destructive assault against MAGA that they can possibly rouse, by that time.

So, you're a fraud denier now too?
 
https://x.com/NickJFuentes/status/1874600793992749283

 
Last edited:
5Xa1E82.jpg
 

Assuming that is true, the test is going to be profits. This decision will either be rewarded or punished in the market. There is no need for the government to intervene and tell IBM shareholders that it knows how to manage their money better than the people they chose to delegate that to.
 
Back
Top