MO - The shooting of Ralph Yarl

The article does not mention what time it was. Seems like a basic relevant fact.

Also of interest: No phone? Especially when he didn't know where he was going? Does any teen not have a phone any more?

No phone?

I'd actually put that in his favor: that he is being raised properly with attentive parents.

My kids did not have phones of their own until they were 18, that was 4 or 5 years ago now.

Even more so now: the shit that spews out of a smart phone is toxic, tumblr, tik tok, fedbook and all the rest is, is garbage.
 
Expect more and more of this kind of incident as our society degrades further into a "low[er] trust" state from a (previously) "high[er] trust" state.

The instant and immediate "racialization" of such incidents prior to any clear evidence corroborating a racial motivation only serves to exacerbate the phenomenon and hastens the degradation of trust. It's just another symptom indicating the disease is already well-advanced.

[...] Yarl ran to three different homes “before someone finally agreed to help him after he was told to lie on the ground with his hands up.”

If this is true, it's one of the most telling indicators of the "low trust" state of affairs I'm talking about.
 
Last edited:
'Gun violence against unarmed black individuals must stop.

'Our children should feel safe, not as though they are being hunted.

Yes, they should.

How about my kids?

There were 5.3 times as many violent incidents committed by black offenders against white victims (472,570) as were committed by white offenders against black victims (89,980),” the department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics said in a September 2020 report.

https://www.westernjournal.com/real-stats-say-black-white-crime-woke-crowd-will-hate-every-one/

https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv19.pdf
 
Expect more and more of this kind of incident as our society degrades further into a "low[er] trust" state from a (previously) "high[er] trust" state.

The instant and immediate "racialization" of such incidents prior to any clear evidence corroborating a racial motivation only serves to exacerbate the phenomenon and hastens the degradation of trust. It's just another symptom indicating the disease is already well-advanced.



If this is true, it's one of the most telling indicators of the "low trust" state of affairs I'm talking about.

The center does not hold...
 
i agree there is a racial element to this situation. If it was a black home owner shooting a white teenager, it wouldn't be national news, you never would have heard about it, haley barry wouldn't tweet about it, Joe Biden wouldn't call the victim. Same if it was black on black shooting.
 
i agree there is a racial element to this situation. If it was a black home owner shooting a white teenager, it wouldn't be national news, you never would have heard about it, haley barry wouldn't tweet about it, Joe Biden wouldn't call the victim. Same if it was black on black shooting.

Well the white on white shooting of the geezer killing the 20 year old white woman made national news.
 
Just for the record, I myself do not (yet) have any opinion about who is or isn't guilty of what in this particular case.

Andrew F. Branca is a lawyer specializing in self-defense law (skip to 1:15):

Elderly Man Defends Against Home Invasion, Charged with Life Felony

In the late night hours of April 13, an 84-year-old homeowner living alone was awoken by someone banging on his front door. Lester prudently armed himself with a .32 caliber pistol, and opened his front door to respond to the person outside.

Before him an unknown 6-foot-tall male, trespassing in violation of several no-trespassing signs, was attempting to force entry through his locked storm door--an apparent forcible home invasion. The homeowner shot at the attempted intruder twice, and the intruder fled. The homeowner then promptly called 911 to report the event.

For this, the homeowner, Andrew Lester has been immediately targeted for racial arson by Benjamin Crump and others of his ilk, with a full-blown propaganda campaign raging across Twitter and news media demonizing Lester for having shot 16-year-old Ralph Yari simply for the "crime" of having rung Lester's doorbell.

Within a day Lester was charged by Prosecutor Zachary Thompson with the life felony of first-degree assault, as well as 15-year felony armed criminal action.

Notably, Prosecutor Thompson informed the public that "It's been my goal from the very beginning to get justice for the child involved in the case." No mention was made of any interest in justice for Andrew Lester.

Join me LIVE at 1 PM ET to discuss this newest travesty of justice being promulgated by Attorney Crump against yet another vulnerable victim of the racial grievance industrial complex.


https://rumble.com/v2izi0y-elderly-man-defends-against-home-invasion-charged-with-life-felony.html
 
Last edited:
Just for the record, I myself do not (yet) have any opinion about who is or isn't guilty of what in this particular case.

Andrew F. Branca is a lawyer specializing in self-defense law (skip to 1:15):

Elderly Man Defends Against Home Invasion, Charged with Life Felony

In the late night hours of April 13, an 84-year-old homeowner living alone was awoken by someone banging on his front door. Lester prudently armed himself with a .32 caliber pistol, and opened his front door to respond to the person outside.

Before him an unknown 6-foot-tall male, trespassing in violation of several no-trespassing signs, was attempting to force entry through his locked storm door--an apparent forcible home invasion. The homeowner shot at the attempted intruder twice, and the intruder fled. The homeowner then promptly called 911 to report the event.

For this, the homeowner, Andrew Lester has been immediately targeted for racial arson by Benjamin Crump and others of his ilk, with a full-blown propaganda campaign raging across Twitter and news media demonizing Lester for having shot 16-year-old Ralph Yari simply for the "crime" of having rung Lester's doorbell.

Within a day Lester was charged by Prosecutor Zachary Thompson with the life felony of first-degree assault, as well as 15-year felony armed criminal action.

Notably, Prosecutor Thompson informed the public that "It's been my goal from the very beginning to get justice for the child involved in the case." No mention was made of any interest in justice for Andrew Lester.

Join me LIVE at 1 PM ET to discuss this newest travesty of justice being promulgated by Attorney Crump against yet another vulnerable victim of the racial grievance industrial complex.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saGcNO8BFfg


Ya, having been down this road multiple times and seen this same movie play out I am highly skeptical of the narrative in the media.
 
I hope justice is served whatever happened here. Without taking any side, I'll say this

NEVER open your front door if this happens to you.

Get your firearm, head out the back or side door, and confront them politely.
This will take them by surprise, and maintain your upper hand.
 
I hope justice is served whatever happened here. Without taking any side, I'll say this

NEVER open your front door if this happens to you.

Get your firearm, head out the back or side door, and confront them politely.
This will take them by surprise, and maintain your upper hand.

Lol, wut?
 
Well the white on white shooting of the geezer killing the 20 year old white woman made national news.

The news was just fulfilling its social obligation to report crimes against young white women.

But only if they are cute. I assume she was cute in this case.
 
The news was just fulfilling its social obligation to report crimes against young white women.

But only if they are cute. I assume she was cute in this case.

Once again, I am going to have to evaluate this in the same manner as that Australian chik that got blown away by a Somali kop in MN.

For me to be meaningfully sympathetic to her, I must have access to her voting record and her support for corrosive public policies.

If she was a gun-grabbing woke kunt, why should I care if she got wasted?

This is not absolution for the killer, it is just a reflection of my conditional IDGAF.

Be assured, this is exactly how THEY think about you.
 
Last edited:
Why Andrew Lester's Shooting of Ralph Yarl Was Lawful

As is common in high-profile, politically- and racially-charged shootings, I'm seeing an enormous amount of bad legal takes on whether the shooting of Ralph Yarl by Andrew Lester could possibly have been lawful.

In fact, Missouri law explicitly allows for the use of deadly defensive force under the circumstances in which Lester encountered Yarl, and we'll explore that in today's show.

One caveat--Yarl claims that the second time he was shot was while he was on the ground. I've seen no evidence to corroborate that claim, but there may well be forensic evidence decisive on that issue. If Yarl's claim is supported by the evidence, that second shot might be difficult to justify.

Any shots fired while Yarl was upright and apparently attempting to unlawfully enter Lester's dwelling, however, were almost certainly lawful under Missouri law.


https://rumble.com/v2j7n3i-why-andrew-lesters-shooting-of-ralph-yarl-was-lawful.html
 
Once again, I am going to have to evaluate this in the same manner as that Australian chik that got blown away by a Somali kop in MN.

For me to be meaningfully sympathetic to her, I must have access to her voting record and her support for corrosive public policies.

If she was a gun-grabbing woke kunt, why should I care if she got wasted?

This is not absolution for the killer, it is just a reflection of my conditional IDGAF.

Be assured, this is exactly how THEY think about you.

I try not to judge women too harshly for that sort of thing. It's our fault for letting them vote in the first place
 
Back
Top