Travlyr
Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2009
- Messages
- 14,088
Question: Since 'the powers that be' can print unlimited amounts of money, then doesn't that negate the Austrian argument about minimum wage?
It seems to me that in a world of 100% redeemable currency, the money supply is fairly static and restricted by natural occurrences. For example, when miners mine gold then the money supply increases. If a gold shipment sinks in the ocean, then the money supply is decreased. Minimum wage laws would be nonsensical using honestly earned money. The Austrian argument is valid.
However, in a dishonest system of fiat currency where the privileged few get to print however much currency they want, then it seems to me that they should be forced to pay higher wages.
Also, the Austrians always lose the emotional argument by opposing the minimum wage laws anyway. Wouldn't the fiat system come crashing down faster if minimum wages were raised? I say raise them to $25.00/hr and let's get this nonsense over with.
It seems to me that in a world of 100% redeemable currency, the money supply is fairly static and restricted by natural occurrences. For example, when miners mine gold then the money supply increases. If a gold shipment sinks in the ocean, then the money supply is decreased. Minimum wage laws would be nonsensical using honestly earned money. The Austrian argument is valid.
However, in a dishonest system of fiat currency where the privileged few get to print however much currency they want, then it seems to me that they should be forced to pay higher wages.
Also, the Austrians always lose the emotional argument by opposing the minimum wage laws anyway. Wouldn't the fiat system come crashing down faster if minimum wages were raised? I say raise them to $25.00/hr and let's get this nonsense over with.

(unless you're the type who likes to destroy his own arguments, of course)