Massie: This Summer Trump’s ‘Indictments Are Going to Ripen into Convictions’

[Swordsmyth]

from your own post "The lawsuit itself is ridiculous, but the underlying facts aren’t disputed, and I think people are going to kind of recoil from that when all that stuff starts coming out this summer. " He's not the one lying here.

The underlying facts ARE disputed.

 

[acptulsa]

The Senate had to approve any choice, you can thank McConnell.
And she's still a vast improvement over RBG.

So, he didn't nominate her, but he did cause the one she replaced to get old?

 

[Invisible Man]

Biden facilitated the attacks that started the war.
Israel failed to stop them when they easily could have.
We should stay out of it.
We should not take any refugees.

The comparison was between Trump and RFK, not Trump and Biden.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Trump is now religion.

 

[oyarde]

What's Trump's position on Israel's war crimes?

At this point i'd be happy with simply ending all foreign aid, everywhere

 

[tebowlives]

The underlying facts ARE disputed.

No they ARE NOT

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

[MENTION=65299]Swordsmyth[/MENTION]
Name one good reputable political analyst.

 

[Occam's Banana]

The Senate had to approve any choice, you can thank McConnell.
And she's still a vast improvement over RBG.

So, then:
(1) Trump (but not, e.g., McConnell) only and always gets the credit-"thanks" for any agreeable SCOTUS decisions, and
(2) someone else (e.g., McConnell, but never Trump) always gets the blame-"thanks" for any disagreeable SCOTUS decisions.

Got it.

QED:

I wonder if we can thank Trump for this one, too. Or does it not really count (because [reasons])?

I mean, I know we're certainly not allowed to blame him for it (because [reasons]), but ...

 

[Brian4Liberty]

No, they don't.

Amash voted for impeachment because Trump had done shady shit, which to his mind was impeachment worthy. As he said at the time, the charges in that impeachment weren't hardly as bad or as proven as the high crimes and/or misdemeanors he had in mind, but pragmatically he figured that was the best articles of impeachment he was going to get. Interesting that you scream at us for being purists, then crap all over whichever one of us dares be pragmatic.
...

Yeah, I fixed mine. I was thinking Amash...

Tell it to Tulsa, I just responded to his assertion:

Tulsa already corrected his error. You are now repeating in bold something that was corrected within 20 minutes of posting.

 

[Mordan]

I have no idea how the communication was working in the DeSantis camp, but to let Massie go on a Sunday morning show to campaign for DeSantis (and criticize his opponents), on the same day that the candidate drops out of the race, is in bad form. I don't know if Massie was blindsided by DeSantis on that or not, but it didn't work out well for Massie.

Massie support of DeSantis was a mistake from the start. The lawfare and outright cheating from Communocrats against Trump is all you need to know.

DeSantis advising Trump on Twitter to not show up at the courts and stay in Florida is enough to disqualify DeSantis forever.

 

[Matt Collins]

he endorsed proven lies that the charges are based on.

Not all of the charges are based on "proven lies." Some are, some aren't. That's the point. It is indeed very likely that Trump will be charged with something, and legitimately so, in the next few months. Some of course are BS, but others are not.

 

[LatinsforPaul]

Even one of Trump's lawyers says their's a probability of Trump being convicted...

 

[acptulsa]

Tulsa already corrected his error. You are now repeating in bold something that was corrected within 20 minutes of posting.

Trump's allowed to make mistakes but I can't. That's why he's qualified to be president and I'm not.

See? It all makes perfect sense.

 

[Swordsmyth]

So, he didn't nominate her, but he did cause the one she replaced to get old?

He nominated the best person he could find that would pass the Senate.
He made SCOTUS better and it resulted in many good rulings and looks like it will result in even better ones.

 

[Swordsmyth]

The comparison was between Trump and RFK, not Trump and Biden.

I listed what Trump has said about the situation as you requested.

 

[Swordsmyth]

So, then:
(1) Trump (but not, e.g., McConnell) only and always gets the credit-"thanks" for any agreeable SCOTUS decisions, and
(2) someone else (e.g., McConnell, but never Trump) always gets the blame-"thanks" for any disagreeable SCOTUS decisions.

Got it.

QED:

Exactly, McConnell and the RINOs were a limiting factor on Trump's choices when he tried to give us a much improved SCOTUS.
The Demoncrats who would not vote for better candidates also get all of the blame.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Tulsa already corrected his error. You are now repeating in bold something that was corrected within 20 minutes of posting.

I only quoted and bolded it to emphasize that it was never my claim.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Massie support of DeSantis was a mistake from the start. The lawfare and outright cheating from Communocrats against Trump is all you need to know.

DeSantis advising Trump on Twitter to not show up at the courts and stay in Florida is enough to disqualify DeSantis forever.

This man understands.

Massie hangs out with Pushaw, a Deep State operative who ran DeepStatus's campaign:

 

[Swordsmyth]

Not all of the charges are based on "proven lies." Some are, some aren't. That's the point. It is indeed very likely that Trump will be charged with something, and legitimately so, in the next few months. Some of course are BS, but others are not.

All of them are.

 

[Swordsmyth]

@Swordsmyth
Name one good reputable political analyst.

Anonymous Conservative.
Sundance of The Conservative Treehouse.

There's two for you.