- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,487
Unsurprisingly, Sanford gets the spotlight so he can criticize Trump (and ramble on about his affair)...
You might want to do some research before you embarrass yourself again.It seems to work for Trump and his fan boys. Trump sold his candidacy with populist policies but once in office abandoned just about every single one of those policies. His anti neocon, take care of America policies were all but abandoned once he became president.
On the other hand, can you give an example where Mark Sanford went against Trump on any and I mean any of his populist policies? Any president to be successful doesn't just need yes men like Rand, he needs people to hold his feet to the fire and encourage him to do the right thing.
I know most of you trumptards avoid threads about Trump's foreign policy, except for the handful of occasions where he said something non-interventionist,....
Lmao, you are a fuckin dumbass.
...a position you find akin to communism.
Your idiotic grandstanding just makes you look even more stupid. Get lost retard
So you believe there are no legitimate criticisms of Trump, despite the fact that he is dropping bombs at an unprecedented rate, continues to support Saudi Arabia, who, alongside the US, are committing war crimes in Yemen and exporting their salafist ideology across the world. He blindly supports Israel and has elevated many Israel-firsters in his admin. like Haley, Kushner, and Bolton. He ripped up the Iran deal, one of the few decent things obama did. He appointed a torturer to head the CIA and as his Sec. of State. He has not drawn down the empire even a little bit in his first 17 months, (he will probably renege his comments on military exercises with South Korea after his advisers give him a talking to.) He expanded military spending by 151 billion dollars (this INCREASE is way more expensive than evil communist demoncrat Bernie Sanders free college plan.) He has delegated much of his commander in chief responsibilities to the pentagon.
Ahh forget it. I'm just scratching the surface and I'm already tired. You are so so right, the only way you can be against Trump is if you want completely unfettered immigration. Nah, you are either being intentionally disingenuous or are just plain stupid. I await the impending logical fallacies and HILRY WOULDA BEEN WERSE.
LOL you are incapable of addressing an argument substantively. I completely destroyed thoughtomator to the point where he refused to respond other than to untruthfully claim I was using a logical fallacy, but now we have an absolute retard like yourself here to defend him. Have you ever even had a proper argument on these forums in your entire posting history? Or is every single person who disagrees with the standard R position a liberal plant?I can't believe you people get paid to post stuff like this!
thoughtomator...untruthfully claim[ed] I was using a logical fallacy,....
So you believe there are no legitimate criticisms of Trump,...
I completely destroyed thoughtomator...
Or is every single person who disagrees with the standard R [Republican] position a liberal plant?
Thoughtomator is right. You even started your straw man with the word "so," which makes straw man detection that much easier. Here is your first sentence to Thoughtomator:
I love it when people get frustrated to the point of declaring themselves the winner. And, they usually use the word "destroyed" in their declaration.
No, because I am extremely careful when identifying RPF's paid shenaniganists. I won't identify someone as a paid liberal plant if I'm only 99% sure. I have to be 100% sure, with no question about. I am 100% sure about you. No question about it.
I won the argument...
Please post 1 piece of evidence showing that I am a PAID LIBERAL SHILL.
Thoughtomator is right. You even started your straw man with the word "so," which makes straw man detection that much easier. Here is your first sentence to Thoughtomator:
I love it when people get frustrated to the point of declaring themselves the winner. And, they usually use the word "destroyed" in their declaration.
No, because I am extremely careful when identifying RPF's paid shenaniganists. I won't identify someone as a paid liberal plant if I'm only 99% sure. I have to be 100% sure, with no question about. I am 100% sure about you. No question about it.
`
I put him on ignore the moment my dishonesty detector went off, on the principle that if I let time-wasting losers consume my time it's my own damn fault.
Keep on winning, bro.![]()
Heh heh; yeah, I probably waste too much time on the paid shills, but sometimes I just like to trolls the trolls. Taste of their own medicine.
`
go on Twitter and troll someone significant, a better use of your time and more effective in terms of anti-psyops
Wouldn't the Twitter account owner just block me? But yeah, I'm always up for some good hijinks.![]()
Katie Arrington, who ousted incumbent South Carolina Rep. Mark Sanford in a Republican congressional primary this month, was seriously injured in a car accident on Friday -- in a wreck that left one person dead.
In a statement posted to Facebook, her campaign said that she underwent surgery after she was injured when a driver traveling in the wrong direction hit her vehicle. A friend who was also in the car was seriously injured.
The Post and Courier reported that the driver in the other vehicle died at the scene.
Her office said that she suffered a fracture in her back, several broken ribs and other injuries that required surgery including the removal of part of her small intestine and a portion of her colon.
“Additionally, the main artery in her legs has a partial collapse and will require a stent,” the statement said. “Additional surgeries will be required including one likely today; and it is likely that Katie will remain hospitalized for the next two weeks.”
...
More: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...n-primary-seriously-injured-in-car-crash.html