Mainstream Republican candidate killer question for Politico debate. Comment here

maybe the NASA guys have nothing better to do?

Truthfully, I would love to be able to fund NASA more. BUT I know it is not a #1 priority right now. People are voting for what they want instead of what is most important for the country. So, I could see why it is popular.
 
Truthfully, I would love to be able to fund NASA more. BUT I know it is not a #1 priority right now. People are voting for what they want instead of what is most important for the country. So, I could see why it is popular.

Or we can try to privatize the sector, space exploration. I'm pretty sure NASA employees would enjoy such movement.
 
http://dyn.politico.com/debate/republicans/VoteForQuestion.cfm

vote for mine asking

1. Question on: Foreign Policy (Not Iraq)
Do you support a policy of pre-emptive strikes including the use of nuclear weapons? YES OR NO ONLY!!!

You have already voted for this question.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2. Question on: Foreign Policy (Not Iraq)
Do you support the US's recent change in foreign policy to that of pre-emptive strikes? Please name the government responsible for this change. Why do you think that US Presidents over the last 200 years did not support this policy?
 
1. Question on: Taxes
Name and site the law in the FEDERAL US CODE that requires all US citizens to pay the un-apportioned federal income tax.
 
This is the question I voted for & I hope everyone else does as well:

159. Question on: Leadership

Will you support the GOP nomination even if it is Dr. Ron Paul? Gentlemen, each of you have openly mocked and belittled 10-term congressman Ron Paul in previous debates. When you mock Dr. Paul's ideas, you mock all his supporters, you mock the Constitution, you mock the original platforms of the GOP. If you are nominated, why should we vote for you?
 
http://dyn.politico.com/debate/republicans/VoteForQuestion.cfm

vote for mine asking

1. Question on: Foreign Policy (Not Iraq)
Do you support a policy of pre-emptive strikes including the use of nuclear weapons? YES OR NO ONLY!!!

You have already voted for this question.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2. Question on: Foreign Policy (Not Iraq)
Do you support the US's recent change in foreign policy to that of pre-emptive strikes? Please name the government responsible for this change. Why do you think that US Presidents over the last 200 years did not support this policy?
Id like to vote for the second question - can you tell me how to find it without having to read each question.

I think most of the candidates will say no to the first question. Even if they say yes, they will say that we will need to have absolute proof that a clear danger exists and that the use of traditonal weapons will not suffice. They will never answer with yes without saying more about it. In fact they will simply say that a question like this cannot be answered with a yes or no - they will turn it around and say the question is irresponsible. No help to RP in my opinion
 
Bumping Thread - added question 2. Please read, vote and bump

Check out the second question we came up with - just as hard hitting as Q1.

please vote it up and bump the thread.
 
ITS WORKING!! we are climbing the most popular section

Please vote and bump the thread.
Thanks.
 
you can vote for as many questions as you like

but only once for any given question.

When you vote, please post the position of the question on the most recent list so I can update the main topic.

thanks
 
Back
Top