voted:
Shouldn't we all be voting on several questions, rather than 1 ?
yes, but we have to be very careful about selecting the questions.
There should be NO way to easily weasel out of the question. If that happens, its a dud question.
The question HAS to expose the candidates thinking as something common people will NOT agree with.
This question was designed to show that there IS a link between the war and the economy and that we CANNOT spend Trillions of $ on an on going basis. A lot of people who dont currently support RP will agree with that. Thats how we win support.
RP made the connection in the debate last night. He said you cannot look at the economy without looking at the war and overseas spending. He has already established himself as the only one making this point.
Im very concerned we will come up with questions that are emotionally tied into the way we all think here - but that doesnt help RP get outside support.
Im also concerned with overly blatant RP questions like
6. Question on: Taxes
This is meant for EVERYONE not just ron paul. Why are we paying taxes that are unconstitutional? How will you get us out from under the the FED that is ruining our economy by printing more money?
They will never ask that one.