If this movement ultimately fails, the attitudes shown in this thread will be the reason why.
Honestly, take off your RP glasses for two seconds and look at this from his shoes. You have a presumptive nominee who has been endorsed by the RNC, YOUR party. This presumptive nominee has the task of going against the most hated (by republicans) president since Carter and maybe even since FDR. If you are in this legislators position, and your entire state party is in upheaval as this great division of the party is taking place right before you are taking on the most hated president in the last 80+ years, you don't sacrifice all of your political capital by siding with the "divisive" group who doesn't care about beating Obama. To do so would alienate you from the state GOP for years. Have you ever considered the possibility that, just maybe, the guy's actually a republican and would rather see Romney then Obama, and wishes to unite the party to defeat him? Siding with Ron Paul divides the party and hurts their chances of beating Obama, like it or not that is true. Therefore, any republican who does divide the party by supporting Paul after the RNC called it for Romney is hurting republican efforts to beat Obama. I personally acknowledge and have no problem with this, beating Obama is not my priority, restoring liberty is. But if I were holding office I don't know that I would create all these bad feelings amongst my party mates towards me by going against the presumed nominee.
This is especially true because there is no upside to it, RP is not going to win his parties nomination so why even consider sacrificing your political capital if electoral victory isn't even in sight? I'm not saying endorsing Romney was the right thing to do, if I were him I would still be supporting Dr Paul, but this guy has a political calculation to make as well as an ideological one. Do you honestly believe Jim Demint and Mike Lee believe that Mitt Romney is a true conservative? Of course they do not, but they endorsed him because to not do so would harm the GOP's #1 objective (eliminating Obama)
Castigating anyone out of our movement who dares to make a political calculation of any sort will ultimately lead to failure of our movement. Unfortunately the only way to truly succeed in politics is to make political calculations (even Dr Paul does it sometimes). Instead of casting this state rep aside, this state rep who studied at the freakin Mises Institute for crying out loud, we should see this for what it is, forgive him and continue to support him. What I am hearing in this thread is if this state rep were to, say, run for Olympia Snowe's vacated seat they would not vote for him. Now who's playing politics instead of focusing on ideology? If we cast aside everyone who ever endorses a presumed nominee we do not like we will either end up with no liberty people in congress or a small group who, not unlike Ron Paul, have zero political capital and therefore can never get any legislation passed. I love Dr Paul, but if we are going to advance as a movement we MUST get past his attitudes regarding playing nice w/ the GOP and acknowledge that some of our people will do things for political reasons.