Louisiana mother ordered to pay child support, give full custody to her rapist

[tebowlives]

duplicate

 

[pcosmar]

You seem to be taking this VERY personally.

Personal Experience. (I remember being young)

Several others that I did Time with,, and I have experienced this False Accusation.

I was a Runaway. I Helped other on that path,, put a spare knife in at least 3 purses.

and that 17 yr old girl with the Beretta in her purse,, watched my back a couple times. and she could frisk everyone in the room, without them knowing it.

 

[acptulsa]

and that 17 yr old girl with the Beretta in her purse,, watched my back a couple times.

An interesting study. The attorney worries about your possible liability; you worried about her. And instead of a liability issue, you got an ally.

 

[pcosmar]

An interesting study. The attorney worries about your possible liability; you worried about her. And instead of a liability issue, you got an ally.

Very interesting story.

A Fed told me to put a gun in her purse.

Her Photos were in the possession of a Creeper they could not hold.

She had the gun the next day.. and hated it,, wanted a 1911.

I still love that girl. she is the broken heart tattoo on my chest.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

LOL..
Half the girls in 7th grade,, at a Catholic school were sexually active. when I was THAT age.

Carolyn's Mother gave us our first real bed when she was 16..(we had a mattress on the floor).
I took her to Key West on a pot run when she was 15. and a pro. had been active since 12 on the streets of Kansas City.

in my experience,, women are far more predatory.and they learn it sooner.

I am currently kept by two of them,,
same ones that had me beat up and arrested in the Past.

Is there an age that you would consider it rape for a 30 year old man that had intercourse, consensual or not, with a girl or boy?

 

[acptulsa]

Is there an age that you would consider it rape for a 30 year old man that had intercourse, consensual or not, with a girl or boy?

Well, that's the rub, isn't it? That's the situation these laws are intended to address. But an age of consent of seventeen does nothing to protect a seventeen year old from a sixty year old. Let a parent of a seventeen year old dating a sixteen year old criticize a district attorney, on the other hand, and what happens?

 

[pcosmar]

Is there an age that you would consider it rape for a 30 year old man that had intercourse, consensual or not, with a girl or boy?

age of consent?? Variable with the times and cultures,, and I believe it is a personal individual point.. everybody is different.

Do you believe an "underage" girl can be Predatory? yes or no

If an "legally underage" girl seduces an older man,, is that Rape? and just who was raped?

by some definition,, I would be guilty.. at 20 I took a 15 yr old across State lines for the purpose of Sex Drugs and Rock n roll.

I don't think anyone was raping anyone. and am glad the State was never involved.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

age of consent?? Variable with the times and cultures,, and I believe it is a personal individual point.. everybody is different.

Do you believe an "underage" girl can be Predatory? yes or no

If an "legally underage" girl seduces an older man,, is that Rape? and just who was raped?

by some definition,, I would be guilty.. at 20 I took a 15 yr old across State lines for the purpose of Sex Drugs and Rock n roll.

I don't think anyone was raping anyone. and am glad the State was never involved.

This proves that things are not as simple as they appear.

Should a parent be able to authorize the sexualization of their 16 year old child?

One thing is for certain. The government is too involved in our lives.

 

[Invisible Man]

Is there an age that you would consider it rape for a 30 year old man that had intercourse, consensual or not, with a girl or boy?

These kind of questions where people look to an impersonal state government made up of strangers hundreds of miles away from the people it rules over legislating one-size-fits-all rules about things like this are good illustrations of why that's no way to answer these questions.

Take those state laws out of the picture, and when people stop deferring to "the law" (which here just means the make believe laws legislated by those governments) and start developing localized communities where people share cultural mores, know one another, have an understanding of who is responsible for what kids, and where senses of honor and shame play their proper roles.

The dictum, "it takes a village to raise a child," has been totally bastardized by the left, because they redefine the word "village" to mean the entire country under the rule of distant regime. But if you take the word "village" to mean what the word really means, that very same slogan totally undermines all the policies of the left, because everything they do destroys and disempowers the small local communities that are signified by the word "village" and replaces them with the opposite.

I don't like the idea of setting a specific number of an age of consent that's the same for everyone. But if we have to have that, then 17 is setting it too old.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

These kind of questions where people look to an impersonal state government made up of strangers hundreds of miles away from the people it rules over legislating one-size-fits-all rules about things like this are good illustrations of why that's no way to answer these questions.

Take those state laws out of the picture, and when people stop deferring to "the law" (which here just means the make believe laws legislated by those governments) and start developing localized communities where people share cultural mores, know one another, have an understanding of who is responsible for what kids, and where senses of honor and shame play their proper roles.

The dictum, "it takes a village to raise a child," has been totally bastardized by the left, because they redefine the word "village" to mean the entire country under the rule of distant regime. But if you take the word "village" to mean what the word really means, that very same slogan totally undermines all the policies of the left, because everything they do destroys and disempowers the small local communities that are signified by the word "village" and replaces them with the opposite.

I don't like the idea of setting a specific number of an age of consent that's the same for everyone. But if we have to have that, then 17 is setting it too old.

Well said! You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Invisible Man again.

 

[pcosmar]

Should a parent be able to authorize the sexualization of their 16 year old child?

Do you mean define their Gender?

I believe the parents SHOULD educate their kids.. I believe few do.

and kids learn,,,everything,, all the time.. They absorb the reality around them.

somehow they have figured it out well enough to populate the earth.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Do you mean define their Gender?

I believe the parents SHOULD educate their kids.. I believe few do.

and kids learn,,,everything,, all the time.. They absorb the reality around them.

somehow they have figured it out well enough to populate the earth.

No I was thinking more in line with a parent having authority to sanction Rita their 14 year old daughter to be sexually involved with the 49 year old homeless guy that sleeps under the bridge.

 

[jmdrake]

It wasn't rape and there is no proof so in no way shape or form is it a fact. A fact can be proven. The alleged rape cannot. It is a he said, she said. Innocent until proven guilty in this country. Credibility vs proof. There is no law, none that says the witness HAS to be believed. Substance, context matters.
He said she was drinking. He didn't say she was drunk.

You are entitled to your own opinion. You are not entitled to your own facts.
If you want to make it about age being what determines consent that is different. In Louisiana it is 17, if it happened in Mississippi it's 16.

You seem to be taking this VERY personally. Probably because you said you were a victim.

Right. In Lousiana the age of consent is 17. And the rape happened with the mother was 16. So once again you have no idea of what you are talking about. Then to "prove" your case that it wasn't about a cellphone, you quoted where the argument was over a cell phone. That and a 14 year old girl making out with a 17 year old boy. Ironic that the father who, based on the statute, raped a 16 year old girl is now upset that his 14 year old is making out with a 17 year old after you and everyone else has been making the argument that girls as young as 12 can consent. No consistency from you I see. But I'm not surprised. And no this has nothing to do with anything that happened to me. I'm not at all taking this personally despite your false claims. My initial and continuing point is the judge in this case made a decision that makes no sense. That YOU think it's okay for a grown man to have sex with an underage girl that he admits he knew was drunk, but denies she had passed out, but then freaks out when it's his daughter that MIGHT be doing the nasty under what are most likely legal circumstances doesn't mean that it makes sense overall. My facts are correct. Your opinions...well they're your opinions.

 

[tod evans]

These kind of questions where people look to an impersonal state government made up of strangers hundreds of miles away from the people it rules over legislating one-size-fits-all rules about things like this are good illustrations of why that's no way to answer these questions.

Take those state laws out of the picture, and when people stop deferring to "the law" (which here just means the make believe laws legislated by those governments) and start developing localized communities where people share cultural mores, know one another, have an understanding of who is responsible for what kids, and where senses of honor and shame play their proper roles.

The dictum, "it takes a village to raise a child," has been totally bastardized by the left, because they redefine the word "village" to mean the entire country under the rule of distant regime. But if you take the word "village" to mean what the word really means, that very same slogan totally undermines all the policies of the left, because everything they do destroys and disempowers the small local communities that are signified by the word "village" and replaces them with the opposite.

I don't like the idea of setting a specific number of an age of consent that's the same for everyone. But if we have to have that, then 17 is setting it too old.

Fed-Gov has ended the "Village" to the point of homogenization.

When villages are not permitted under federal law to expel those who don't conform with the villages mores and ethics the only thing that changes from one village to another is the name and scenery.

Not that long ago the Italians/Danes/Polish/Chinese/Jews/Etc all had their own villages within cities and even whole sections in some states. (Now, as far as I know, it's just the Anabaptists who succeed in keeping the feds kinda at bay.)

This country is entirely too diverse to attempt one size fits all governing.

 

[jmdrake]

Personal Experience. (I remember being young)

Yes. But this isn't about someone being young. It's about someone being older sleeping with someone young.

Several others that I did Time with,, and I have experienced this False Accusation.

Except...it's not a false accusation. The only think possibly false is the accusations HE made against HER with regards to their daughter and whether or not the mother was unconscious at the time of the sexual encounter. Now the dad's being a bit of a hypocrite. But I get it. He doesn't want her doing what he did to her mother when she was young.

I was a Runaway. I Helped other on that path,, put a spare knife in at least 3 purses.

and that 17 yr old girl with the Beretta in her purse,, watched my back a couple times. and she could frisk everyone in the room, without them knowing it.

That's nice. I'm not even sure what you think that has to do with the subject at hand. And all circumstances are different.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Fed-Gov has ended the "Village" to the point of homogenization.

When villages are not permitted under federal law to expel those who don't conform with the villages mores and ethics the only thing that changes from one village to another is the name and scenery.

Not that long ago the Italians/Danes/Polish/Chinese/Jews/Etc all had their own villages within cities and even whole sections in some states. (Now, as far as I know, it's just the Anabaptists who succeed in keeping the feds kinda at bay.)

This country is entirely too diverse to attempt one size fits all governing.

Tucker talks about diversity here:

 

[jmdrake]

These kind of questions where people look to an impersonal state government made up of strangers hundreds of miles away from the people it rules over legislating one-size-fits-all rules about things like this are good illustrations of why that's no way to answer these questions.

Take those state laws out of the picture, and when people stop deferring to "the law" (which here just means the make believe laws legislated by those governments) and start developing localized communities where people share cultural mores, know one another, have an understanding of who is responsible for what kids, and where senses of honor and shame play their proper roles.

The dictum, "it takes a village to raise a child," has been totally bastardized by the left, because they redefine the word "village" to mean the entire country under the rule of distant regime. But if you take the word "village" to mean what the word really means, that very same slogan totally undermines all the policies of the left, because everything they do destroys and disempowers the small local communities that are signified by the word "village" and replaces them with the opposite.

I don't like the idea of setting a specific number of an age of consent that's the same for everyone. But if we have to have that, then 17 is setting it too old.

The African "village" proverb has truly been abused! A village is really your extended family and/or church family and/or neighbors. It's not the freaking federal government! The point that's gotten lost in this entire discussion is, since we live in a statist world, what kind of "justice" does should be met out. The dad in this situation wanted full custody because he thought his daughter's cell phone might allow someone else to do with her what he did with her mom. So after all of this talk of "age of consent being arbitrary", he apparently disagrees with EVERYBODY that's been defending him from the rape accusation. How ironic is that! (And thank you [MENTION=73146]tebowlives[/MENTION] for accidentally exposing this hypocrisy). He didn't want his precious 14 year old girl to even be able to contact her 17 year old boyfriend. What's the argument as to why he, who's guilty of the same thing the 17 year old MAY be guilty of, for getting full custody? Crickets?

Well said! You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Invisible Man again.

Covered.

 

[tebowlives]

Right. In Lousiana the age of consent is 17. And the rape happened with the mother was 16. So once again you have no idea of what you are talking about.

It wasn't rape so again you prove you have no idea what you are talking about and you prove it again and again in this very post.

Then to "prove" your case that it wasn't about a cellphone, you quoted where the argument was over a cell phone. That and a 14 year old girl making out with a 17 year old boy. Ironic that the father who, based on the statute, raped a 16 year old girl is now upset that his 14 year old is making out with a 17 year old after you and everyone else has been making the argument that girls as young as 12 can consent. No consistency from you I see. But I'm not surprised.

It's not about a cell phone. That you would ignore everything else which is much more problematic because you are trying so hard to be right instead of seeking the truth does not surprise me.

And no this has nothing to do with anything that happened to me. I'm not at all taking this personally despite your false claims. My initial and continuing point is the judge in this case made a decision that makes no sense. That YOU think it's okay for a grown man to have sex with an underage girl

I don't think it's okay a grown man to have sex with an underage girl and you have no proof I do. That you have to make things up in order to deflect because you don't have a leg to stand on is repulsive.

that he admits he knew was drunk,

he never admitted that he knew she was drunk and you cannot prove it.

but denies she had passed out,

No proof she did pass out.

but then freaks out when it's his daughter that MIGHT be doing the nasty under what are most likely legal circumstances doesn't mean that it makes sense overall.

has nothing to do with the fact that the birth mother is a scumbag. Has nothing to do with the false rape allegations that didn't surface until years later.

My facts are correct.

You haven't provided any.

Your opinions...well they're your opinions.

I used facts and the judge agrees. That you want that lowlife gutter skank to have custody is disgusting.

 

[tod evans]

Tucker talks about diversity here:

I made it 2 city mayors bleeting over federal dollars before I turned it off.

Was there a point there?

Other than to end free-stuff programs which I'm willing to bet wasn't even discussed.

 

[tebowlives]

The African "village" proverb has truly been abused! A village is really your extended family and/or church family and/or neighbors. It's not the freaking federal government! The point that's gotten lost in this entire discussion is, since we live in a statist world, what kind of "justice" does should be met out. The dad in this situation wanted full custody because he thought his daughter's cell phone might allow someone else to do with her what he did with her mom. So after all of this talk of "age of consent being arbitrary", he apparently disagrees with EVERYBODY that's been defending him from the rape accusation. How ironic is that! (And thank you @tebowlives for accidentally exposing this hypocrisy). He didn't want his precious 14 year old girl to even be able to contact her 17 year old boyfriend. What's the argument as to why he, who's guilty of the same thing the 17 year old MAY be guilty of, for getting full custody? Crickets?

I didn't expose the hypocrisy. You just made that up in order to deflect from the actual issue.

What I did expose, by using facts from the custody cases, was that he deserves custody over the scumbag birth mother who is a horrible influence and a liar. Something she has proved over and over again.