Looting Resumes In Ferguson; Local Police Ordered To Stand Down

[phill4paul]

They're doing it because they're being encouraged to,...by liberals like you.

The Marxist forums are down the street.

Take a hike.

Are you sure you're on the right forums?

http://www.redstate.com/

 

[Smitty]

This was a much better place before all of the disgruntled liberals decided that the libertarian forums were a good place to vent.

It seemed to have begun somewhere between the time that Rand endorsed Romney and Obama sent 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan.

 

[Lucille]

The woman speaking at 0:40 mark about a public servant being judge/jury/executioner comes across as informed, can such protestors be cultivated by asking them if they are aware that SWC droneking has also acted in similar fashion to channel their rage for broader change of mentality from the top?
If all black supporters of SWC Obama who still support him were informed that he has also acted as judge/jury/executioner and his policies have killed thousands of innocent children/women, will his support among American black community drop from 90% to 20-30%?




Related

[h=3]Hypothetical: Does thugish behavior trickle down to policing institutions from the top[/h]
[h=3]Is the ongoing Surge of Police State in America a Surge of Karma?[/h]

I would assume they're already aware of Kill List Tuesday. Maybe not though!

I was watching the infowars feed the other day and the people being interviewed were gushing all over Obama and Holder saying what a great job they've done handling this situation. I guess they're unaware how much the Obama regime has accelerated the militarization of the police.

 

[Natural Citizen]

They're doing it because they're being encouraged to,...by liberals like you.

The Marxist forums are down the street.

Take a hike.

I'm afraid that kind of ad-hominem doesn't work anymore. It used to work with people. But it doesn't any longer. So then if you'd like to engage the issue with me I'll be in the neighborhood. Mind you, the issue isn't what some historically illiterate kid with a microphone from Reason decides that it's going to be in his/her we ask, you decide world. Uh-uh. Nope. Doesn't work that way.

 

[Smitty]

I'm afraid that kind of ad-hominem doesn't work anymore. It used to work with people. But it doesn't any longer. So then if you'd like to engage the issue with me I'll be in the neighborhood.

As I recall, the issue you raised was the psychology of the looters.

Before we go on,..what are your credentials for determining the psychological makeup of people?

 

[Natural Citizen]

As I recall, the issue you raised was the psychology of the looters.

Uh-uh. Nope. I quoted King. I just skipped over a couple of generations to come back down to your train of logic. What he said was that a riot is the language of the unheard. And this is true. And so you won't be beginning anything where you think you're going to be beginning. So then back yourself up and explain why you disagree with the relevance of King's quote. You can't just throw out some ad-hominem left-right spew and think you're going to change the terms of controversy. This is the championship kitchen, sparky. We'll get to the psychology of these people. Don't you worry on bit.

I'll be back in a few.

 

[Smitty]

Uh-uh. .

You obviously need a reminder.

Are you sure you understand the psychology of why these people are doing what they are doing?

No,...I don't.

Please give your credentials in psychology then explain it to me.

 

[SeanTX]

"@L0gg0l: #BREAKING - MISSOURI GOV. NIXON ORDERS STATE OF EMERGENCY, CURFEW IN FERGUSON"

Should be interesting to see them enforce this "curfew"

 

[mad cow]

The sad thing is that after the riot is over and businesses are forced to close they will complain about losing places to shop and jobs in the neighborhood and wonder why new businesses don't want to open in the area. They really hurt themselves.

Yep,and then the usual suspects will start bellyaching about how the area is a 'food desert' and we must do something.

Would you open a business where the Quick Trip used to stand?

 

[tod evans]

"@L0gg0l: #BREAKING - MISSOURI GOV. NIXON ORDERS STATE OF EMERGENCY, CURFEW IN FERGUSON"

Should be interesting to see them enforce this "curfew"

Because everybody gives a shit about new laws all of a sudden....

 

[phill4paul]

"@L0gg0l: #BREAKING - MISSOURI GOV. NIXON ORDERS STATE OF EMERGENCY, CURFEW IN FERGUSON"

That is some funny shit right there. Lol.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Uh-uh. Nope. I quoted King. I just skipped over a couple of generations to come back down to your train of logic. What he said was that a riot is the language of the unheard. And this is true. And so you won't be beginning anything where you think you're going to be beginning. So then back yourself up and explain why you disagree with the relevance of King's quote. You can't just throw out some ad-hominem left-right spew and think you're going to change the terms of controversy. This is the championship kitchen, sparky. We'll get to the psychology of these people. Don't you worry on bit.

You obviously need a reminder.

Nope. It looks like you're the one who needs a reminder. Quote me correctly, please, (I've replaced, here, what you avoided previously) and address the question as well as any disagreement that you may have with relevance of my quotation of King. You can't cherry pick, call me a Marxist and post some link to a liberal web site befire running away from the fact that I asked what your problem is with my quoting the man in context with the answer that these peopel gave.

 

[JK/SEA]

"If you make peaceful change impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable" -J.F. Kennedy

 

[Natural Citizen]

Is anyone going to get upset with me if I wreck this thread for a bit? I assure folks that I won't stray off topic but it may seem that way since I think I'm going to be responding to ad-hominem more than anything.

 

[JK/SEA]

Is anyone going to get upset with me if I wreck this thread for a bit? I assure folks that I won't stray off topic but it may seem that way since I think I'm going to be responding to ad-hominem more than anything.

what did i do now?..

 

[Smitty]

Is anyone going to get upset with me if I wreck this thread for a bit? I assure folks that I won't stray off topic but it may seem that way since I think I'm going to be responding to ad-hominem more than anything.

Okay,..so you obviously have no professional psychology credentials.

Since you brought it up, would you like to make a layman's guess as to the psychology of the looters?

 

[Smitty]

I suppose some would think that it's relevant to the topic.

 

[JK/SEA]

//

 

[JK/SEA]

Okay,..so you obviously have no professional psychology credentials.

Since you brought it up, would you like to make a layman's guess as to the psychology of the looters?

irrelevant.

 

[Natural Citizen]

I suppose some would think that it's relevant to the topic.

Well, it is. In fact it's relevant to the larger scope of issue once we are faced with political representation of these people in spite of the actions of a few. As well, attempting to introduce that side of it in a hostile, fragmented, atmosphere is a very dangerous thing. It's why I want(ed) you to address your issue with the fact that I quoted King instead of throwing rocks and then referencing me in the third person.

Here's what I'm going to do. I'm going to add a blog here at RPF with regard to my "point of view" in context with political history and social psychology that we see evolve from specific instances of it and relative to this subject and current events. How is that? I've never done that but I'll look around and see how I go about doing it. A

And, of course, if you have anything that you strongly disagree with then, by all means, respond accordingly. I'll have have to scribble it up, mind you. There is nothing to be had by trolling you in a thread that will be forgotten in a week. You see? But the fact remains that the issue will still exist. And so maybe that's a better way of addressing your concern for people like me who come along and post a quote that you don't like...for whatever reason. Youi still haven't said. You just kind of called me a Marxist and kicked the can down the road.