Looting Resumes In Ferguson; Local Police Ordered To Stand Down

I also think that it's a bad strategy for libertarians to try to "out liberal" the democrats.
 
Well,...to sum up.

*This* libertarian believe that looters deserve any misfortune that comes their way from anyone who decides to give it to them.

Riots aren't the time to attempt to push a political agenda which calls for limiting the power of the police.

Nor is police occupation like in Boston, huh?
 


The woman speaking at 0:40 mark about a public servant being judge/jury/executioner comes across as informed, can such protestors be cultivated by asking them if they are aware that SWC droneking has also acted in similar fashion to channel their rage for broader change of mentality from the top?
If all black supporters of SWC Obama who still support him were informed that he has also acted as judge/jury/executioner and his policies have killed thousands of innocen children/women, will his support among American black community drop from 90% to 20-30%?




Related


[h=3]Hypothetical: Does thugish behavior trickle down to policing institutions from the top[/h]
[h=3]Is the ongoing Surge of Police State in America a Surge of Karma?[/h]
 
Last edited:
Well,...to sum up.

*This* libertarian believe that looters deserve any misfortune that comes their way from anyone who decides to give it to them.

I haven't seen the police there do much at all to the looters. They've just been targeting people in general, and that's the problem.

Like last night, it was mostly calm until one person threw a bottle at the police. Then they broke out the tear gas on a mostly peaceful crowd and that stirred things up -- then the police let the looters loot. The only businesses they've done anything to protect are the Walmarts, Targets, etc -- those get MRAPs and perimeters, while small businesses are on their own.
 
Last edited:
.

Like last night, it was mostly calm until one person threw a bottle at the police. Then they broke out the tear gas on a mostly peaceful crowd and that stirred things up -- then the police let the looters loot. The only businesses they've done anything to protect are the Walmarts, Targets, etc -- those get MRAPs and perimeters, while small businesses are on their own.

Are you on the scene or did you see that on TV?
 
Reason interviewed a few people there and they said they supported the looters since the situation wouldn't have gotten any media attention otherwise.

A riot is the language of the unheard. - Martin Luther King Jr.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps,but I believe a store owner has every right to blow the head off of anybody looting his store.
Not so much with a cop buying a doughnut

I have not implied that I do not believe in an individuals right to protect property. In fact I am so for it that I do not believe police are needed if individuals lived up to their own responsibilities.
 
Are you on the scene or did you see that on TV?

Just following the accounts of those who are there on the ground -- of course you would just say that they are biased so what they report can't possibly be true. However, you'd probably believe the police, who have their own bias.
 
The sad thing is that after the riot is over and businesses are forced to close they will complain about losing places to shop and jobs in the neighborhood and wonder why new businesses don't want to open in the area. They really hurt themselves.

They aren't really "getting back at the man".
 
Last edited:
Are you sure you understand the psychology of why these people are doing what they are doing? Do you understand the historical significance? Fuck off.

They're doing it because they're being encouraged to,...by liberals like you.

The Marxist forums are down the street.

Take a hike.
 
Back
Top