Um, Ruwart has alot to prove. How about getting something done in another office before trying to get people to vote for you as president.
Bob Barr will put the country on a better path then the republicans and democrats. Again, you're not going to change everything all at once, buddy. The congress won't respect a no-name president. They aren't going to be swung in one felled swoop. Elect someone that can, and will make progress. Ruwart hasn't even done anything on the state/local level. I can go around saying stuff too but it doesn't make me qualified to be president.
Ruwart says she's been around long enough....but what has she done? I'm sick of people talking and not delivering, and she is one of them.
He's the only one there who understands this game.
Oooh... cool, now it's nothing but a "game".![]()
How about we quit thinking that ONLY previously elected (aka "Career") politicians can be effective in office?
It was NEVER supposed to be a "climb the ladder" of offices... all that means is that EVERY "representative" is a career pol, and every officeholder is a career pol... ever wonder if maybe THAT is the main problem?
Someone give us some summary of Root vs. Barr please...
differences?
Slightly Rephrase that, and you have the GOP agenda for 2008:
The only candidate who has any chance of getting any significant media coverage, let alone getting into the debates, is MCCAIN. He may not be a perfect REPUBLICAN, but he will advance the party and philosophy more than any of the others.
Blech.
Root = Pretty Boy NeoCon.
Barr = Old White Guy NeoCon.
Ok. Don't bitch when 20 yrs from now the Libertarian party is exactly the same place it is now. Or worse.
Oooh... cool, now it's nothing but a "game".![]()