mysticgeek
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2008
- Messages
- 652
hahaha... Gravel busted on camera
Very true. Mary Ruwart would get NO coverage. Barr could get a significant amount.
The only candidate who has any chance of getting any significant media coverage, let alone getting into the debates, is Barr. He may not be a perfect Libertarian, but he will advance the party and philosophy more than any of the others.
Incrementalism, people. We didn't get to this point all at once. Don't expect to reverse course all at once.
Incrementalism, people. We didn't get to this point all at once. Don't expect to reverse course all at once.
Also, I think it's ignorant that Mary would say Bob Barr isn't principled. Bob Barr is taking steps that produce progress one step at a time.
Again, if you try to jump across a cliff you probably won't make it. Build a bridge, and you'll get there.
Exactly what I'm saying. If you want progress, you need to swallow your pride and let it happen. Some of the die hard libs can't do it, though. So to me, that makes them as bad in my eyes as Hillary or McCain. It's almost like roadblocking progress.
Slightly Rephrase that, and you have the GOP agenda for 2008:
The only candidate who has any chance of getting any significant media coverage, let alone getting into the debates, is MCCAIN. He may not be a perfect REPUBLICAN, but he will advance the party and philosophy more than any of the others.
Blech.
Sorry but many of Bob Barr's proposed policies would continue to take this country down the WRONG path. You can ignore it if you want. That's an awful big sell out for a couple of appearances on Fox News, though.