Libertarian national convention May 27–30 in Orlando (Official thread)

SMDH... This election year could be a game changer for the LP and this douche nozzle is the guy the front runner throws his support behind for VP?

I guess it would be good to see actual video for the context of his comment. That's really boneheaded.
 
Boy what a bad pick Weld is. I just watched his speech live on Periscope. Unimpressive. He's clearly a republican. Perhaps with a bit of libertarian swing to it, but no real libertarian. Not at all. The audience seemed to be unimpressed too. He's a very hard sell. He could easily lose the VP nomination. And with that, Johnson could lose too.
 
Boy what a bad pick Weld is. I just watched his speech live on Periscope. Unimpressive. He's clearly a republican. Perhaps with a bit of libertarian swing to it, but no real libertarian. Not at all. The audience seemed to be unimpressed too. He's a very hard sell. He could easily lose the VP nomination. And with that, Johnson could lose too.


In 2008, Mary Ruwart and Bob Barr were neck-to-neck in support by voting delegates. Barr teamed up with Wayne Allen Root and won the ballot, also giving W.A.R. the VP slot with Barr's delegates.

In 2016 look for a similar scenario, but with a partnership between Petersen and McAfee.
That is my prediction. So, technically- if Petersen or McAfee place second on a multi-ballot contest. The third place finisher may endorse the second place finisher. And with their delegates combined- beat Johnson. and then use the delegate coalition to put the other on the VP ticket.
 
Weigel with a report from the convention:


Experienced Libertarian ticket becomes a tough sell in Orlando

By David Weigel
May 28 at 12:42 PM

ORLANDO — Upstairs, Bill Weld was the presumptive vice presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party, powering through interview after interview. Downstairs, the former Republican governor of Massachusetts found himself arguing about whether Mexico was a threat to the economic life of the United States.

“We can’t allow Mexico to continue to be dysfunctional and pass on the costs to us,” said a Libertarian delegate from Arizona.

Weld, who would have been ambassador to Mexico had antiabortion Republicans not rejected him, waited out the lecture. He paused for a picture with a camera-challenged delegate — “I can only hold this smile for 45 minutes” — then offered his solution.

“What they really need is to extend the highways,” said Weld, “to get the traffic going more easily further south.”

It was not every day that a Libertarian candidate talked about building superhighways. “The Birchers are paranoid about that,” said Ernest Hancock, another Arizona activist.

“The Birchers? They do?” asked Weld, miming the act of folding up a piece of paper. “Oh, I’d better hide this newsletter!”

Just one week ago, Weld agreed to join former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson on the Libertarian Party’s ticket. The likely nomination of unpopular major-party candidates had already spiked interest in the 40-year-old party: A chart displayed to delegates showed Web searches on the party quintupling after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) conceded the Republican race to Donald Trump. The Weld-Johnson ticket, socially liberal and economically conservative, looked to offer a historic challenge to the two-party system. But first, the ticket has to get through the Libertarian Party’s weekend gauntlet.

...

read more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...arian-ticket-becomes-a-tough-sell-in-orlando/
 
 
In 2008, Mary Ruwart and Bob Barr were neck-to-neck in support by voting delegates. Barr teamed up with Wayne Allen Root and won the ballot, also giving W.A.R. the VP slot with Barr's delegates.

In 2016 look for a similar scenario, but with a partnership between Petersen and McAfee.
That is my prediction. So, technically- if Petersen or McAfee place second on a multi-ballot contest. The third place finisher may endorse the second place finisher. And with their delegates combined- beat Johnson. and then use the delegate coalition to put the other on the VP ticket.

That would be great if that happens.
 
In 2016 look for a similar scenario, but with a partnership between Petersen and McAfee.
That is my prediction. So, technically- if Petersen or McAfee place second on a multi-ballot contest. The third place finisher may endorse the second place finisher. And with their delegates combined- beat Johnson. and then use the delegate coalition to put the other on the VP ticket.

This would be my bet too. Johnson's VP pick will destroy him. Eventually, the delegates will probably edge more towards a pure libertarian ticket than a pragmatic ex-republican, fired up by Austin's and McAfee's hardcore supporters who will be noisy during the election process. A group of noisy hardcore supporters can sway a group who didn't know who to vote for, and even some hesitant Johnson followers, to vote for Austin/McAfee. Johnson will then not get a majority of the votes, and lose in later rounds. He might go ballistic, I'll be watching on Periscope!
 
There seems to be a sense that McAfee doesn't have as passionate or large a support group on the ground as Peterson or Johnson. Does anybody else have any info to confirm or refute this?
 
There seems to be a sense that McAfee doesn't have as passionate or large a support group on the ground as Peterson or Johnson. Does anybody else have any info to confirm or refute this?

I'm a McAfee supporter, but if I was back down in Florida, I'd be open to building a Stop GJ coalition. Could be what's happening?
 
Did anyone else think Ron was going to jump in during his video message? It seemed like he's against a Johnson/Weld ticket by that video.
 
nomination tokens


Johnson 221
Petersen 104
Perry 105
McAfee 95
Feldman 76


nomination speech determined by D20.
 
You know, it's another misstep for libertarians but would play well in the general election arena -

 


 
Back
Top