'LGGBDTTTIQQAAP' replaces 'LGBT.'

[timosman]

In case somebody needs more info - http://durhametfo.ca/committees/lgbtq/

 

[LibertyEagle]

The word, pervert, is just so much easier to remember.

 

[Wooden Indian]

I've long been a supporter of gays.

Growing up I had several bisexual girlfriends which led to numerous adventures. My brother was gay, 2 good friends were gay, I've had 3 gay bosses and 2 of them were really cool....

But most of that was in the late 90s, and I'll tell ya, there's a different "breed" of gay these days.

A few of the old-school pillow biters and greyhaired carpet munchers are pretty ashamed of what happened to their movement and will speak out, but most have just taken a quiet backseat to this millennial madness.

I blame the media.

 

[shakey1]

LGGBDTTTIQQAAP???... Oh FFS.

 

[tommyrp12]

H-B-I is enough. Although this is all heading toward state compelled speech so it won't matter.

 

[juleswin]

Well officially, I am supposed to have quit RPF a while back but every once in a while I decided to lurk to see what silly adventures you kids are up to. Anyway, as is very common with RPF, someone usually posts something outrageously, hard to believe feminist and SJW related article to get everybody riled up.

To cut a long story short because I am on a timer. What evidence is there to support this pic? any shyte stirrer could have easily made it, taken a pic of it and then went ahead to spread it to the masses. I am not saying this is what happened but this could have happened and absent any real evidence to support this pic, I wouldn't go around spreading it like it is gospel

And why do I think this could be fake? for one, go to the elementary teachers federation of Ontario (ETFO) official website and use the calendar function to search for June 6th events and this inclusiveness training doesn't show up, also the website still uses the abbreviation LGBTQ in their documents(need microsoft word to read their documents (type inclusive in the search bar and start reading) posted after the June 6th (2016 maybe?). Does this mean that they disregarded what they learned in their inclusiveness training? that is possible. But seeing as there is really nothing backing this picture, I would definitely stay the hell away from it. You don't want to be the one spreading fake news.

Don't believe everything you read on the internet that confirms your bias. Peace out people.

http://www.etfo.ca/Pages/Home.aspx official website.

 

[Danke]

H-B-I is enough. Although this is all heading toward state compelled speech so it won't matter.

I thought just HB covered it. But I’m OK with the addition of “I”

 

[Anti Federalist]

W=Weirdosexuals.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

What evidence is there to support this pic?

I'm selective in my consultation of Snopes for several reasons, but apparently they called the Durham chapter of the EFTO and got a quote. Snopes story is here.

Snopes also traces it back to a source here and here although those might not be as convincing.

I'm inclined to believe the sources, although you could still dig deeper. I really don't think a hoaxster would have gone to all this trouble. And unless somebody working at Snopes really has an axe to grind and totally made up the Durham text, then I'd be inclined to believe it. I also don't think it's that hard to believe. This nonsense is pushed all the time.

 

[phill4paul]

I'm selective in my consultation of Snopes for several reasons, but apparently they called the Durham chapter of the EFTO and got a quote. Snopes story is here.

Snopes also traces it back to a source here and here although those might not be as convincing.

I'm inclined to believe the sources, although you could still dig deeper. I really don't think a hoaxster would have gone to all this trouble. And unless somebody working at Snopes really has an axe to grind and totally made up the Durham text, then I'd be inclined to believe it. I also don't think it's that hard to believe. This nonsense is pushed all the time.

He's just bent because there is not a Che-sexual moniker.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

He's just bent because there is not a Che-sexual moniker.

Rhymes with Che, so it's catchy.

 

[Anti Federalist]

From the Snopes article linked above:

Interestingly, that very disconnect points toward part of the reason that the LGBTQ acronym seems to constantly grow. Not only are cultural attitudes about gender and sexuality quickly changing, but language itself continues to expand to describe something that is often difficult to put into words — namely, human sexuality and gender identity.

Boys have a penis.

Girls have a vagina.

Not difficult.

Only a weirdosexual could fuck that up.

 

[Swordsmyth]

From the Snopes article linked above:



Boys have a penis.

Girls have a vagina.

Not hard.

Only a weirdosexual could $#@! that up.

And just to deal with the Dr. Frankensteins and their sick customers:

Y chromosome=BOY
No Y chromosome=GIRL

 

[juleswin]

I'm selective in my consultation of Snopes for several reasons, but apparently they called the Durham chapter of the EFTO and got a quote. Snopes story is here.

Snopes also traces it back to a source here and here although those might not be as convincing.

I'm inclined to believe the sources, although you could still dig deeper. I really don't think a hoaxster would have gone to all this trouble. And unless somebody working at Snopes really has an axe to grind and totally made up the Durham text, then I'd be inclined to believe it. I also don't think it's that hard to believe. This nonsense is pushed all the time.

You are one of the people on this site that rarely goes for cheap attacks and more importantly does the hard work of researching topics being discussed i.e. no lazy posting on your part unlike some people I dare not mention. Thanks for the post which confirms my earlier suspicion that either this was a hoax or the flier was made in jest. From snoops link we can assert that it was the latter.

WHAT'S FALSE
The acronym was used facetiously as a way to attract participants to the training.

However, the acronym LGGBDTTTIQQAAPP was used somewhat facetiously in order to publicize the training. A representative for the Durham chapter of the EFTO told us:

"Yes, the poster is genuine. The intent of the title was to draw workshop participants (teachers) by acknowledging that keeping track of diverse LGBTQ identities can be overwhelming, especially as our students are continuously identifying new ones. In our union, we use LGBTQ as an umbrella term for all marginalized sexual and gender identities."

The word facetious gave the context to the flier which most of the triggered wingers would prefer is not disclosed. Psst, the website still uses LGBTQ in their subsequent official documents even after the seminar. If they were serious with the flier, they would have kept the longer abbreviation after the seminar but they didn't.

The funny thing is that even after this point is revealed by snoops, this wouldn't deter the incessant adolescent jokes and snickering by the multitude of RPF wingers. I put the last part in the hope that u guys will try your best to prove me wrong

Btw, trying to quit RPF is harder than trying to quit crack. The moment u come back, the stronger the urge to stick around and reply to all the shyte posting that people make.

Oh well, time to practice some self control and make like a banana and peel

 

[Swordsmyth]

He's just bent because there is not a Che-sexual moniker.

Commiephilia?

 

[TheTexan]

W=Weirdosexuals.

I'm into some weird stuff.

Like bubble wrap