Let's be honest. What was this election really about? Why is this happening everywhere?

[Ender]

I seriously doubt she won the popular vote (aren't they still counting?), and I think at the ballot box they could only cheat so much before it became blatantly obvious.

I don't believe a word the msm says - especially when it comes to Hillary Clinton.

Results at this moment are:

Clinton 60,467,601 votes

Trump 60,072,551 votes


20 electoral votes still available

Clinton
228

Trump
290

 

[Ender]

"'Don't Make the Black Kids Angry"

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw

To be fair it was another black kid who stopped the fight and protected the girl- AND it was a 1 on 1- I was expecting a 5 to 1 from the title.

 

[Danke]

To be fair it was another black kid who stopped the fight and protected the girl- AND it was a 1 on 1- I was expecting a 5 to 1 from the title.

I saw a mulatto, not "another black kid."

 

[Ender]

I saw a mulatto, not "another black kid."

1 drop rule, dude. Under that I'm legally black.

It was 1 girl being an ass and slapping another girl around and mostly pulling her hair, one girl not sticking up for herself, and another girl stopping it.

Not cool, but not exactly the brutal beating the tube title proclaims.

 

[Danke]

1 drop rule, dude. Under that I'm legally black.

It was 1 girl being an ass and slapping another girl around and mostly pulling her hair, one girl not sticking up for herself, and another girl stopping it.

Not cool, but not exactly the brutal beating the tube title proclaims.

No blood necessary, just have to identify as one.

 

[TommyJeff]

I know why this is happening and I saw this coming a decade ago.. Didn't know when it would happen, but I knew it would happen in my lifetime.

Leave the PC at the door. I'm interested in your thoughts...

Exit polls show that even people who voted for trump, don't like him. This election showed the dislike for the progressive movement and progressive over reach. It has to be an ideological rejection when the person selected is so personally disliked.

 

[Danke]

Exit polls show that even people who voted for trump, don't like him. This election showed the dislike for the progressive movement and progressive over reach. It has to be an ideological rejection when the person selected is so personally disliked.

The ones that answered the people doing the exit polls. But for the truth, you just have to attend one of his rallies, or other supporters' / campaign groups.

 

[parocks]

That is the PC answer. In all reality, his supporters were highly energized by him.

To the OP:
He won because he made calculated appeals to a wide swath of people. He won because he knew he had to, and he did whatever was necessary, and said whatever was necessary to win. He did not win to save the white race. He won to save the United States, and the ideals of the United States. He realizes white people are a part of the US, but he does not define the US as white.

Reading Wikileaks about Satanic Pedophila did not make me like Trump more, it made me like Hillary less. That 's not PC.

There were a number of different things going on. Trump did take a page from the 1996 Buchanan protectionist playbook, and Democrat rust belt states did go to Trump, GOP, for the first time in a while. PA, MI, WI, IA.

So, yeah, there is a certain amount of pro Trump there in those states.

 

[CPUd]

People do not like Hillary Clinton. That's what this election was about. Her potential voters didn't care to turn out for her, and the people who hate her turned out to vote against her.

How many times did you have to hear, "well, I don't like Trump, but we can't have Hillary win!!"


This election was a mandate on Hillary Clinton. And it was sweet! (Don't misread the mandate)

QFT. This is the type of stuff that happens when people can't stop voting for shit candidates.

 

[parocks]

That's what this election was about. In 2020, the socialist will crush Trump, taking at least 40 states. All of these riots are meant to energize the young scum. Trump's big government solutions to the recession will fail, and free markets will get the blame. If Trump doesn't put forward any gun control laws, these four years are probably the last chance to "legally" buy your guns and ammo.

All the anti war protests worked so well between 1968 and 1972? Nixon got creamed in 1972?

You might find that if the Soros funded protesting Dems keep this up, they'll have very few allies in 4 years and Trump could end up a cross between Nixon 1972 and Reagan 1984. In 1980, the Dems were pushing a similar version of fear against Reagan as they were pushing against Trump. What happened between 80 and 84 is that people realized that Reagan wasn't the scary meany that the media was telling everyone he was, but generally a decent, likeable enough fella. It's rare for incumbents to lose and it's rare for parties to keep the Presidency for more than 8 years. 8/8/8/8 is normal. Incumbent Presidents winning is normal.

 

[RandallFan]

If you want a non PC example: Dumb Black Celebrities, Dumb black sports players talked down to white Americans.


Some white guy in a factory knows more about politics than Lebron James. What the fuck does he know. All he has had to do is go train for 2 hours a day since high school and use his natural athletic ability.

I think 50% of black girls get raped in high school, but a bunch of concerned black celebrities are complaining Trump tried to "grope" bimbos and oligarch wives.


Most white women and some moderate minorities would vote for Trump as boss at their workplace.

They wont vote for a hag.

 

[TommyJeff]

The ones that answered the people doing the exit polls. But for the truth, you just have to attend one of his rallies, or other supporters' / campaign groups.

It's true that if everyone answers these exit polls, but how does that disprove this election as a vote against progressive overreach?

 

[rg17]

I wish Trump pick Rand Paul as his VP.

 

[AZJoe]

Justin Raimondo: The Foreign Policy Factor
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/11/10/trump-won-foreign-policy-factor/

"The one factor conspicuously missing from these expositions on the electorate’s romance with Trump is the attraction of his “America First” foreign policy stance. Indeed, Trump’s view that the US footprint abroad is too large and his vow to make it much smaller is what enraged the Washington, D.C. elites the most about his candidacy: a bevy of GOP foreign policy “experts” sent out at least two “open letters” excoriating Trump for his “isolationism” – the cardinal sin, according to neoconservative orthodoxy. This was the core of the Republican “Never Trump” faction’s complaint. And the Clintonites added their voices to this chorus, gladly welcoming the neoconservatives into their ranks.

Yet the common assumption is that ordinary voters – precisely the sort of voters who turned out for Trump – don’t care about foreign policy …

This, of course, is one big reason why the media, the pollsters, and the pundits missed the biggest story of the last half century: they just didn’t get that Trump’s campaign against globalism meant a repudiation of America’s role as the world’s policeman – and that Trump’s supporters, after a decade and a half of constant warfare, fully understood and agreed with his “isolationism.”…

Why are we paying for the defense of Europe when the Soviet threat has long since ceased to exist? Why are we defending the Saudis, when jihadists inspired by their Wahabist ideology are attacking us – including on September 11, 2001? Both South Korea and Japan are rich countries, whose industries are out-competing us and hollowing out the factory towns that were once the heart and soul of America: why, then, are we risking war and emptying our pockets in order to defend them from threats both real and imagined? These are the questions Trump asked …

but the War Party doesn’t give up so easily. The pressure on President Trump to compromise and even reverse his anti-interventionist instincts is already apparent and growing. … The neocons are already trying to sneak into his administration … That’s why it’s vitally important for Trump’s supporters … to be vigilant, and make their voices heard. President Trump is facing not only opposition from the Democrats, but from the people in his own party – neoconservatives and GOP “moderates” – who abhor his foreign policy stance. They hate the very idea of “America First,” and will do anything and everything to sabotage the translation of Trump’s campaign promises into policy. The War Party is on the move, as is the so-called Deep … stop them… By raising our voices, by protesting and appealing directly to the President himself ... making noise, and lots of it. … The battle to put America first is far from over: indeed, it has hardly begun. The next four years is going to be hand-to-hand combat. …"

 

[jmdrake]

In the year of the anti establishment candidate the democrats cheated their anti establishment candidate (Bernie Sanders) out of a win.

 

[openfire]

If you were hoping that people would come in and say that this is a white race thing, only white nationalists and SJWs believe that.

Not even close. What do freedom, truth, prosperity, rule of law, sovereignty and self determination have to do with race? Turn off CNN, it's frying your brain.

 

[AZJoe]

 

[69360]

I think Trump won because the democracts shit on working class white people too often. These white people don't necessarily hate anyone, but they hit a breaking point. They see the democrats care more about where a dude in a dress takes a dump than jobs. They care more about Obamacare costing them more money than about coddling blacks on the dole and muslim immigrants. Plus 40 years of corruption seems to have finally caught up with the Clinton crime family.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Justin Raimondo: The Foreign Policy Factor
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/11/10/trump-won-foreign-policy-factor/

"The one factor conspicuously missing from these expositions on the electorate’s romance with Trump is the attraction of his “America First” foreign policy stance. Indeed, Trump’s view that the US footprint abroad is too large and his vow to make it much smaller is what enraged the Washington, D.C. elites the most about his candidacy: a bevy of GOP foreign policy “experts” sent out at least two “open letters” excoriating Trump for his “isolationism” – the cardinal sin, according to neoconservative orthodoxy. This was the core of the Republican “Never Trump” faction’s complaint. And the Clintonites added their voices to this chorus, gladly welcoming the neoconservatives into their ranks.

Yet the common assumption is that ordinary voters – precisely the sort of voters who turned out for Trump – don’t care about foreign policy …

This, of course, is one big reason why the media, the pollsters, and the pundits missed the biggest story of the last half century: they just didn’t get that Trump’s campaign against globalism meant a repudiation of America’s role as the world’s policeman – and that Trump’s supporters, after a decade and a half of constant warfare, fully understood and agreed with his “isolationism.”…

Why are we paying for the defense of Europe when the Soviet threat has long since ceased to exist? Why are we defending the Saudis, when jihadists inspired by their Wahabist ideology are attacking us – including on September 11, 2001? Both South Korea and Japan are rich countries, whose industries are out-competing us and hollowing out the factory towns that were once the heart and soul of America: why, then, are we risking war and emptying our pockets in order to defend them from threats both real and imagined? These are the questions Trump asked …

but the War Party doesn’t give up so easily. The pressure on President Trump to compromise and even reverse his anti-interventionist instincts is already apparent and growing. … The neocons are already trying to sneak into his administration … That’s why it’s vitally important for Trump’s supporters … to be vigilant, and make their voices heard. President Trump is facing not only opposition from the Democrats, but from the people in his own party – neoconservatives and GOP “moderates” – who abhor his foreign policy stance. They hate the very idea of “America First,” and will do anything and everything to sabotage the translation of Trump’s campaign promises into policy. The War Party is on the move, as is the so-called Deep … stop them… By raising our voices, by protesting and appealing directly to the President himself ... making noise, and lots of it. … The battle to put America first is far from over: indeed, it has hardly begun. The next four years is going to be hand-to-hand combat. …"

Let's be honest. What was this election really about? Why is this happening everywhere?

The true behind the scenes battle, or the surface level used to manipulate the ignorant masses?

Raimondo talks about the real battle. It was the globalist socialists vs. the "isolationist" nationalists. The Leninist/Trots and assorted globalists fought Trump to the death because they hate the idea of "America First" in the US, just like they hate Putin for looking out for the interests of Russia, and not playing globalist cronyism with them.

The media would prefer everyone see this as a race battle. The media has been pushing ad-nauseum the "poor stupid white people elected Trump" nonsense. Standard divide and conquer, along with a convenient distraction from their true globalist motives.

Somehow after the last two elections, I missed the mainstream media talking constantly about Obama being elected because of black voters. Oh yeah, that's because they never said that, because of their hypocrisy, deceit and double standards.

 

[UWDude]

the media, as always, doesn't even touch that Trump pulled in millions of anti-war voters. It wasn;t just economic issues. The media ALWAYS ignores the issues of their stupid wars. ALWAYS.