Let's be honest. What was this election really about? Why is this happening everywhere?

[nikcers]

If you were hoping that people would come in and say that this is a white race thing, only white nationalists and SJWs believe that.

The funny thing is some white nationalists and SJWS didn't fall for the establishments divide conquer tactics. They just hijacked a lot of them by creating a populist anti intellectual movement. The SJW/democrats are re inforcing their narratives and creating mountains out of molehills. What is this big distraction away from government and government policy? Could our debt finally be at a breaking point?

 

[eleganz]

Yes, but he didn't win because of his supporters. He won because people didn't show up for Hillary. He won because lots and lots of people turned out to vote against Hillary. If it was just his supporters, the result would have been far different. Obviously, as a supporter of his, you are misreading the mandate. The real mandate is that people did not want Hillary. (Hell, even Trump's campaign used that strategy for the last month!) (Even among his "supporters" the biggest cheer line - even bigger than "build the wall" - was "lock her up!")

The people that helped Trump across the finish line were Obama voters in 2012.

PA, WI, MI, and historically blue counties as well as recent blue counties in various states.

The craziest supporters were his base but he couldn't win with just the base.

 

[seapilot]

This is exactly right. In a strange way, I suppose we can thank God that Hillary Clinton's corruption led to the defeat of Bernie Sanders.

Get ready for 2020 there is going to be a big socialist on the Democrat ticket. Its the natural response to Drumpf getting elected. It will continue to keep stretching in each direction till it rips in half.

As for what happened in the election, I agree it was really saying I AM NO F%#@% way with with Her rather than I am with him. The democrats finally chose their SJW, climate agenda, PC world over the blue collar worker that used to be their backbone. Now they have no backbone and really no message to the average working person.

 

[EBounding]

I think it's hillarious that both sides think he's going to deport all the Mexicans and put gay people in camps. He's walked back big time the deportation talk; only criminal illegals will be deported now, which is the same position as the democrats. He's also the most "pro-gay" president; what other president has literally held up the LGBQTETC. flag?

 

[alucard13mm]

Get ready for 2020 there is going to be a big socialist on the Democrat ticket. Its the natural response to Drumpf getting elected. It will continue to keep stretching in each direction till it rips in half.

As for what happened in the election, I agree it was really saying I AM NO F%#@% way with with Her rather than I am with him. The democrats finally chose their SJW, climate agenda, PC world over the blue collar worker that used to be their backbone. Now they have no backbone and really no message to the average working person.

If Trump fucks up, which there is a pretty high chance, socialist/SJW will come out in droves to make sure they will win this time lol.

 

[The Gold Standard]

Get ready for 2020 there is going to be a big socialist on the Democrat ticket. Its the natural response to Drumpf getting elected.

That's what this election was about. In 2020, the socialist will crush Trump, taking at least 40 states. All of these riots are meant to energize the young scum. Trump's big government solutions to the recession will fail, and free markets will get the blame. If Trump doesn't put forward any gun control laws, these four years are probably the last chance to "legally" buy your guns and ammo.

 

[Jamesiv1]

That is the PC answer. In all reality, his supporters were highly energized by him.

^this

Both the Hillary Hate, and the Trump Love was grossly underestimated, and the cheating by the Democrats was grossly under-reported.

 

[nobody's_hero]

It was about anger. Then it was about being told rather condescendingly by leftist elitists and establishmentarians, that anger is not a characteristic that wins elections.

And then it was about the angry people beating them in those elections, and watching them cry.

-signed,

one of the "angry white males"

 

[UWDude]

That's what this election was about. In 2020, the socialist will crush Trump, taking at least 40 states. All of these riots are meant to energize the young scum. Trump's big government solutions to the recession will fail, and free markets will get the blame. If Trump doesn't put forward any gun control laws, these four years are probably the last chance to "legally" buy your guns and ammo.

Or the Democrats can try a safe establishment candidate again,"centerist" that draws on a "broad coalition" of anti-Trump democrats and Republicans, to try and assure victory.

I mean, after all, you are talking the 2020 elections, when Trump is still months away from inauguration. I don't think your crystal ball is that good.

 

[nobody's_hero]

I don't know. Shame that someone as corrupt as Clinton could still be so close to winning the election. Pretty scary actually.

But then I think about who she ran against and it starts to make sense.

I do not think the democrats will have viable challengers in the future. Hillary won the popular vote. It's only a matter of time before they do away with the electoral college and we end up with the directly-elected national democratic state that they want, and the name of the game will then be, "California wins."

This election basically showed that we've reached the tipping point. There are now officially enough people on the left who will vote for even the sh1ttiest candidate ever in the history of the US elections and still be able to outnumber the opposition, and these people want free stuff, your stuff, and they have the numbers to take it.

 

[Jamesiv1]

I do not think the democrats will have viable challengers in the future. Hillary won the popular vote. It's only a matter of time before they do away with the electoral college and we end up with the directly-elected national democratic state that they want, and the name of the game will then be, "California wins."

I seriously doubt she won the popular vote (aren't they still counting?), and I think at the ballot box they could only cheat so much before it became blatantly obvious.

I don't believe a word the msm says - especially when it comes to Hillary Clinton.

 

[AuH20]

All they needed was a little nudge.

 

[nobody's_hero]

I seriously doubt she won the popular vote (aren't they still counting?), and I think at the ballot box they could only cheat so much before it became blatantly obvious.

I don't believe a word the msm says - especially when it comes to Hillary Clinton.

True, I forgot to account for cheating. Still, I think the number of teat-suckers is out-pacing the folks who know life is full of hard-knocks and you only survive through hard work and/or harnessing personal creativity. That's a dying attitude in this country.

 

[tod evans]

and these people want free stuff, your stuff, and they have the numbers to take it.

Ever seen a yuppie in the Ozarks?

 

[Republicanguy]

The working man has his job shipped overseas or is replaced by illegal immigrants, but all the democrats were outraged about was whether transgenders could use the bathroom of their choice.

The only bone that was thrown to him was seen as a slap to the face: He was promised a living wage to work at McDonalds, when he feels like he was born to make cars.

So the honorable working class man became the uneducated angry redneck and the Democrats became the party of bureaucrats and academics.

That is true, but a lot would say well if that is what there is, then that is what there is. Any job is better than no job as the rightwing would put forward unlike the picky left I'm in on political views.

 

[alucard13mm]

I seriously doubt she won the popular vote (aren't they still counting?), and I think at the ballot box they could only cheat so much before it became blatantly obvious.

I don't believe a word the msm says - especially when it comes to Hillary Clinton.

CNN projected trump will win popular

 

[Jamesiv1]

CNN projected trump will win popular

From CNN's website:

http://www.cnn.com/election/results

 

[Lucille]

It's just time.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/its-just-time-martin-armstrong.pdf

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/political-analysis/

 

[Jamesiv1]

True, I forgot to account for cheating. Still, I think the number of teat-suckers is out-pacing the folks who know life is full of hard-knocks and you only survive through hard work and/or harnessing personal creativity. That's a dying attitude in this country.

I hear you.

Things can change though. Seems the teat-suckers are mostly 20-somethings and college kids. Take away the teats and they will toughen up - or starve.

 

[Danke]

All they needed was a little nudge.

"'Don't Make the Black Kids Angry"

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw