Kurt endorses Mitt Romney/Paul Ryan ticket....

Looks to me that he's playing politics. Seems like he thinks Ron's shot is very slim and would rather bite his tongue so he isn't ousted by the party.

Can't say I agree, but let's see how he votes.

McChronagle said:
Its a political "endorsement" people... nothing of actual substance is happening here.
Click to expand...
 
McChronagle said:
Its a political "endorsement" people... nothing of actual substance is happening here.
Click to expand...

You can't spin this...

I really thought this Kurt Bills guy was genuine and awaken from the two party paradigm. I even went as far as going to his donation page on his site! Of course, I said I'd do it later and never did...
 
NoOneButPaul said:
The truth is this sentiment pervades because the grassroots are too lazy when it comes to the local and state elections and want an excuse not to help out candidates so they can instead focus all their time and energy on a lost POTUS campaign.
Click to expand...

you continue to think Ron's campaign is getting in the way of people rushing to do what you would prefer they do with their own time.
 
sailingaway said:
My immediate thought was, "If he can do it -- they all can! And we need to only elect those who will!
Click to expand...

This is exactly my feelings on the subject, this sentiment is what originally brought me out of my apathy towards our government and political system. Now I"m supposed to support those that don't stick to their promises and principles?
 
I would rather he endorse Gary Johnson, but that has basically no upside politically. Its unrealistic to expect politicians and candidates to make perfectly principled decisions when 90% of the voting public won't reward a candidate for being principled. I saw this from Friedman and it seems applicable.

 
cajuncocoa said:
IF IT MEANS NOTHING, THEN WHY DO IT???
Click to expand...

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to cajuncocoa again."

Exactly. Sure, we all know what endorsements can and can't do. We know that, in some cases, they are just words used to pick up some votes and/or gain a favorable footing within the party. Some even have negative consequences. We all know what an endorsement is.

So, don't tell me that you stand for LIBERTY and support the one man who has never compromised in a very long and impressive tenure in D.C. and then turn around and endorse establishment nitwits.

I retweeted a quote today that I found absolutely brilliant and completely relevant:

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe

At this point, I don't know who Claire Wolfe is and don't care. The quote applies in this context that working within the system will corrupt you. However, if you don't, you can't get anything done! So, what do you do? Stand for principle, or work within the system long enough to become corrupted by all of it's inner workings?
 
NoOneButPaul said:
The truth is this sentiment pervades because the grassroots are too lazy when it comes to the local and state elections and want an excuse not to help out candidates so they can instead focus all their time and energy on a lost POTUS campaign.
Click to expand...
This is going to be a rant.

How do you blame the grassroots for this? And what is the point of working fingers to bone for local and state candidates who will eventually run for the House or Senate and stab us in the back by endorsing some clown for POTUS in his/her party?

You all wanted GOP, this is what you get. You can't be part of the party and then when a presidential election comes around expect that you can get away with not supporting the candidate! Being a team player is all-important in partisan politics. It doesn't matter to them if Romney will do exactly what Obama has been doing...what matters is that Obama will no longer be the one doing it!

WOO-HOO!! Our team won!! /sarcasm

Meh. I don't want to play that game. I don't want to support people who play that game. Don't you see how stupid this is??

And if you say it doesn't matter, then why do it??
 
misean said:
I would rather he endorse Gary Johnson, but that has basically no upside politically. Its unrealistic to expect politicians and candidates to make perfectly principled decisions when 90% of the voting public won't reward a candidate for being principled. I saw this from Friedman and it seems applicable.

Click to expand...


that's a utilitarian argument and doesn't help when your personal value system is principled.
 
cajuncocoa said:
This is going to be a rant.

How do you blame the grassroots for this? And what is the point of working fingers to bone for local and state candidates who will eventually run for the House or Senate and stab us in the back by endorsing some clown for POTUS in his/her party?

You all wanted GOP, this is what you get. You can't be part of the party and then when a presidential election comes around expect that you can get away with not supporting the candidate! Being a team player is all-important in partisan politics. It doesn't matter to them if Romney will do exactly what Obama has been doing...what matters is that Obama will no longer be the one doing it!

WOO-HOO!! Our team won!! /sarcasm

Meh. I don't want to play that game. I don't want to support people who play that game. Don't you see how stupid this is??

And if you say it doesn't matter, then why do it??
Click to expand...

 
Okie RP fan said:
"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to cajuncocoa again."

Exactly. Sure, we all know what endorsements can and can't do. We know that, in some cases, they are just words used to pick up some votes and/or gain a favorable footing within the party. Some even have negative consequences. We all know what an endorsement is.

So, don't tell me that you stand for LIBERTY and support the one man who has never compromised in a very long and impressive tenure in D.C. and then turn around and endorse establishment nitwits.

I retweeted a quote today that I found absolutely brilliant and completely relevant:

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe

At this point, I don't know who Claire Wolfe is and don't care. The quote applies in this context that working within the system will corrupt you. However, if you don't, you can't get anything done! So, what do you do? Stand for principle, or work within the system long enough to become corrupted by all of it's inner workings?
Click to expand...

Work within the system and don't be corrupted by it.

Be Ron Paul.
 
sailingaway said:
Work within the system and don't be corrupted by it.

Be Ron Paul.
Click to expand...

That is the whole point, though, that we have been stating this whole time: there isn't another Ron Paul! And at this rate, there won't be another for a time to come.

Ron Paul is a rarity. He is the diamond in the rough. If candidates such as Kurt Bills can't even stick it out long enough throughout his own race before having to resort to endorsing Romney, who can we trust?

I understand Kurt may actually believe in Romney's plan. If that's the case, Kurt was never full-on with the r3volution, which, is fine.
 
Okie RP fan said:
That is the whole point, though, that we have been stating this whole time: there isn't another Ron Paul! And at this rate, there won't be another for a time to come.

Ron Paul is a rarity. He is the diamond in the rough. If candidates such as Kurt Bills can't even stick it out long enough throughout his own race before having to resort to endorsing Romney, who can we trust?

I understand Kurt may actually believe in Romney's plan. If that's the case, Kurt was never full-on with the r3volution, which, is fine.
Click to expand...
What I'm saying is that high standards are the entire point.
 
Man these folks that choose these "liberty" candidates do such a wonderful job got 2 traitors now...who is gonna be #3.
 
Wasn't Kurt being hammered by the establishment for supporting Ron in the primaries? I personally had the impression that he was going to lose, maybe this is just damage control
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top