I'm not sure if any of you are tracking this story, but Kosovo is on the verge of declaring independence:
http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-01-28-voa32.cfm
http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1201522629.66
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/...-ban-says-kosovo-a-european-union-affair.html
The danger is not only Serbia's reaction, but Russia's. It's been suggested Russia would decide to recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia in Georgia, a decision Georgia says would result in war. What's more Armenia has suggested Kosovo would serve as a precedent for Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan, which could result in war yet again.
In particular interest on that subject is the following:
Source: Wired
This is definitely one of the most disturbing things I've read in the past year. While the author suggests this refers to Iran, I think that is completely inappropriate. For one there are pictures:
These pictures of the scenarios played out do not suggest a threat from Iran or an operation against Iran. The first image shows a thrust south, but not towards the Iranian border, but towards the border of Nagorno-Karabakh. The other two show this is most likely not related to Iran because it shows a northern thrust, from the Azeri side of the Iranian border. This suggests the scenario does not entail a thrust towards Iran, but may instead involve preventing a Russian invasion.
The mention of an asymmetric threat seems to refer to some form of terrorist attacks, which may refer either to Armenian terrorists in Nagorno-Karabakh or the PKK. Recently the PKK has threatened to launch attacks on Azerbaijan if Turkey invades Northern Iraq and Azerbaijan has talked about striking PKK bases in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Azerbaijan may use Kurdish attacks to justify attacking Nagorno-Karabakh, prompting a response by Armenians in Azeri territories, which would lead to a war and as Armenia is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization with Russia, it may lead to Russian threats of invasion and movement of American troops into Azerbaijan to prevent an invasion.
This war game may be based around the possibility of this event actually occurring.
It's quite frightening and the broader implications are even more frightening.
http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-01-28-voa32.cfm
http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1201522629.66
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/...-ban-says-kosovo-a-european-union-affair.html
The danger is not only Serbia's reaction, but Russia's. It's been suggested Russia would decide to recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia in Georgia, a decision Georgia says would result in war. What's more Armenia has suggested Kosovo would serve as a precedent for Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan, which could result in war yet again.
In particular interest on that subject is the following:
A July, 2006 "Operational Requirements Document," obtained by DANGER ROOM, outlines out a series of simulations and training exercises that helped form the technical and operational foundation for Future Combat Systems. These trials were all based on Azerbaijan's "Caspian Sea scenario." Most involve the taking of the capital city, Baku.
Earlier war games were set in other locations -- places where American troops might some day seem to be more likely to fight. Those included a "North Korean Architecture Analysis," to see if a new kind of munitions launch system was feasible. Another, set "in the 2010(+) time frame," evaluated "battle command" systems in "the complex terrain of the Balkans."
But what makes the Azerbaijan model different is that almost every component of the massive Future Combat Systems effort -- from the "Infantry Carrier Vehicles" to the packbackable robots to the flying drones to the next-generation mortars to the commander's rolling headquarters -- had their "mission profiles... based on three Major Combat Operations (MCOs: 1, 2, 3) conducted within the Caspian Sea scenario."
Azerbaijan was picked as the FCS model because "the nation now faces a new reality embodied in the Caspian Sea scenario," Army consultant Clyde T. Wilson in an Armor magazine article.
The Caspian Sea scenario is not about fighting in the Caspian Sea area, but is all about the next most dangerous situation U.S. forces are likely to face. In many ways, it follows the 1950-53 Korean War scenario. Country A (South Korea) is attacked by Country B (North Korea). The U.S. comes to the assistance of Country A. The thrust of the scenario is how does the U.S. enter the battle area and build-up sufficient forces to achieve its national goals. The scenario is further complicated by Country C (China), which threatens to enter the conflict, especially during the buildup phase when the U.S. is most vulnerable.
The Korean scenario provides national decisionmakers with significant geopolitical issues. The situation becomes more complicated when adding an asymmetric threat like we saw during Vietnam. The Caspian Sea scenario is about getting credible force into the area of operations and deterring aggression by Country C. In the scenario, the arrival of U.S. heavy forces represents endgame. At this point, we dominate the battlefield. After heavy forces arrive in the area, they must be prepared to conduct combat operations against the heavy threat presented by Country C while providing self-protection against an asymmetric threat that specifically targets U.S. vulnerabilities.
Wilson doesn't specify which nation "County C" represents in this scenario. But, according to the Washington Post's William Arkin, "the United States and Britain have been conducting war games and contingency planning under a Caspian Sea scenario that could also pave the way for northern operations against Iran.
Source: Wired
This is definitely one of the most disturbing things I've read in the past year. While the author suggests this refers to Iran, I think that is completely inappropriate. For one there are pictures:



These pictures of the scenarios played out do not suggest a threat from Iran or an operation against Iran. The first image shows a thrust south, but not towards the Iranian border, but towards the border of Nagorno-Karabakh. The other two show this is most likely not related to Iran because it shows a northern thrust, from the Azeri side of the Iranian border. This suggests the scenario does not entail a thrust towards Iran, but may instead involve preventing a Russian invasion.
The mention of an asymmetric threat seems to refer to some form of terrorist attacks, which may refer either to Armenian terrorists in Nagorno-Karabakh or the PKK. Recently the PKK has threatened to launch attacks on Azerbaijan if Turkey invades Northern Iraq and Azerbaijan has talked about striking PKK bases in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Azerbaijan may use Kurdish attacks to justify attacking Nagorno-Karabakh, prompting a response by Armenians in Azeri territories, which would lead to a war and as Armenia is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization with Russia, it may lead to Russian threats of invasion and movement of American troops into Azerbaijan to prevent an invasion.
This war game may be based around the possibility of this event actually occurring.
It's quite frightening and the broader implications are even more frightening.