I have become very intrigued by Austrian economics after learning of the school through Ron Paul's campaign. I have just recently read Hazlitt's "Economics in One Lesson" and "Economic Policy" by Mises, and have also been watching videos online of speakers from the Mises Institute. I am planning on jumping into some deeper Mises books soon, but was thinking it would be good to get a little more understand of the other side first.
The more I study about Austrian theory, the more confused I become as to how Keynesian economists could possibly (rationally) think their policies will work. The arguments laid out on the Austrian side are very clear and seem self-evident in most cases. Since the majority of economists today are Keynesian (as well as our current policies, unfortunately), it seems like there must be some big thing that I'm just not seeing. How could so many very intelligent people be so confused on something that they have spent their lives studying? I am definitely not saying that I will just defer to them and assume they're right because they're experts, I just would like to better understand their point of view. Austrian economics seems obvious to me, but I like to look at a problem from all angles.
So, all that to say... this might not be the best place to ask for resources on Keynesian economics, but could anyone recommend any books that provide good systematic, rational arguments for Keynesian economics (if such a thing exists), or a Keynesian rebuttal of the Austrian school of thought? Preferably, an introductory, intermediate, and more advanced book to accompany my study of Austrian economics.
Thanks in advance.
The more I study about Austrian theory, the more confused I become as to how Keynesian economists could possibly (rationally) think their policies will work. The arguments laid out on the Austrian side are very clear and seem self-evident in most cases. Since the majority of economists today are Keynesian (as well as our current policies, unfortunately), it seems like there must be some big thing that I'm just not seeing. How could so many very intelligent people be so confused on something that they have spent their lives studying? I am definitely not saying that I will just defer to them and assume they're right because they're experts, I just would like to better understand their point of view. Austrian economics seems obvious to me, but I like to look at a problem from all angles.
So, all that to say... this might not be the best place to ask for resources on Keynesian economics, but could anyone recommend any books that provide good systematic, rational arguments for Keynesian economics (if such a thing exists), or a Keynesian rebuttal of the Austrian school of thought? Preferably, an introductory, intermediate, and more advanced book to accompany my study of Austrian economics.
Thanks in advance.