Judge Napolitano posted police brutality on his FB

Deborah K

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
17,997
I've never noticed him doing this before. This is good.

https://www.facebook.com/JudgeNapolitano

Sheriff’s Deputy Executes Unarmed Man Surrendering With Hands In The Air (VIDEO)

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/s...n-surrendering-hands-air-video/#axzz2rG0tgRhO

An Arizona Sheriff’s deputy shot and killed the man, claiming he was reaching for a gun when the man raised his hands in the air.

An Arizona deputy shot and killed a man claiming he was reaching for a gun, but a cell phone video shows the man had raised his hands in the air.

However, Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu insists the man should have been killed much earlier because he wasn’t complying with their orders.

But obviously Babeu is trying to spin the story after the cell phone video contradicted their earlier rendition of the facts.

According to CBS5:

A witness shot the video on a cell phone. It shows the final moments of the standoff, when deputies were ordering Manuel Longoria to surrender. The deputies had their weapons drawn and fired five bean bag rounds at the suspect, in addition to Taser rounds.

Longoria appeared to be moving his arms around, and did not appear to be cooperating with the deputies. Seconds later, the video shows Longoria turn his back on the deputies and raise both hands into the air, high over his head. One second later, a lone deputy fired two shots, killing Longoria.

A statement issued on the day of the shooting read:

“Officers and deputies attempted to use less lethal means to take him into custody including firing several bean bag rounds and Taser deployments. The suspect refused to obey the commands and suddenly reached back into the vehicle. A deputy felt the suspect was reaching for the gun he reportedly had, so he then fired two rounds.”

The statement does not mention the fact that Longoria had his hands above his head when he was shot. Witnesses told CBS 5 Investigates they heard Longoria say he had a gun and would not be taken into custody alive. But after the shooting, investigators found no weapon.

“I believe even looking at it in those circumstances, if I was a patrol officer and I was forced in that same situation, I would likely have shot him before that deputy shot him,” said Sheriff Paul Babeu, who spoke to CBS 5 Investigates via satellite from Washington, DC, where he was attending a conference.


But the video was so revealing that even a former cop said the deputy was out of line.

But a former DPS and Scottsdale Police Officer Jess Torrez disagreed after viewing the video.

“You have multiple police officers on the scene and only one person makes the shot. That tells me that other officers at the scene did not feel there was justification to use deadly physical force,” said Torrez.

Torrez said despite Longoria’s behavior during the chase and initial part of the standoff, the only actions that were central to a decision to shoot, occurred right before the deputy opened fire.

“Officers are taught to look at the hands first and foremost. So if his hands are up in the air, he doesn’t have anything in them. How do they justify using deadly force?” asked Torrez.


Read more at TLR: Sheriff's Deputy Executes Unarmed Man Surrendering With Hands In The Air (VIDEO) | The Libertarian Republic http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/s...n-surrendering-hands-air-video/#ixzz2rLyi9tEM
Follow us: @LibRepublic on Twitter | LibertarianRepublic on Facebook
 
“I believe even looking at it in those circumstances, if I was a patrol officer and I was forced in that same situation, I would likely have shot him before that deputy shot him,” said Sheriff Paul Babeu

That's all you need to take away from this. Move along. Or you might get some of the same.
 
“I believe even looking at it in those circumstances, if I was a patrol officer and I was forced in that same situation, I would likely have shot him before that deputy shot him,” said Sheriff Paul Babeu

That's all you need to take away from this. Move along. Or you might get some of the same.

But then there's this:

But the video was so revealing that even a former cop said the deputy was out of line.

But a former DPS and Scottsdale Police Officer Jess Torrez disagreed after viewing the video.

“You have multiple police officers on the scene and only one person makes the shot. That tells me that other officers at the scene did not feel there was justification to use deadly physical force,” said Torrez.

Torrez said despite Longoria’s behavior during the chase and initial part of the standoff, the only actions that were central to a decision to shoot, occurred right before the deputy opened fire.

“Officers are taught to look at the hands first and foremost. So if his hands are up in the air, he doesn’t have anything in them. How do they justify using deadly force?” asked Torrez.
 
But then there's this:

But a former DPS and Scottsdale Police Officer Jess Torrez disagreed after viewing the video.

“You have multiple police officers on the scene and only one person makes the shot. That tells me that other officers at the scene did not feel there was justification to use deadly physical force,” said Torrez.

THAT tells me that new policy is gonna dictate that if one lights someone up then they all need to light that someone up.

Doesn't matter. Same case was made for the shooting in Charlotte,N.C of an unarmed accident victim. Rookie cop fires, no one else does. Grand jury still doesn't indict.
 
I could be wrong, but I believe he's taken this issue on before. Anyway, good on him. :)
 
This was not a good shoot. Former DPS and Scottsdale Police Officer Jess Torrez explained why deadly force is not justified and he is correct.... look at the hands.

However, the guy said he had a gun and would not be taken alive... he wanted them to shoot him. Let's not pretend the cops just executed him for no reason... they thought he was armed and dangerous.
 
Did you listen to what this asshole said? Sheriff PAUL BABEU says it was, "Suicide by Cop" ...even though the guy has his hands in the air and of course, no weapon ever found. Lying bastards, more like "Murder by Cop"

ukn_bor.jpg

Sheriff's Deputy Executes Unarmed Man Surrendering With Hands In The Air (VIDEO) | The Libertarian Republic
 
This was not a good shoot. Former DPS and Scottsdale Police Officer Jess Torrez explained why deadly force is not justified and he is correct.... look at the hands.

However, the guy said he had a gun and would not be taken alive... he wanted them to shoot him. Let's not pretend the cops just executed him for no reason... they thought he was armed and dangerous.

Right here is a major issue!

Authorization to kill because of your thoughts is a bridge best not crossed.

Direct assault with a deadly weapon, not a perceived weapon, is the only justifiable shooting.

It's been proved repeatedly that cops thought processes are fucked up and permitting them to kill based on these "thoughts" ain't gonna cut it.
 
Right here is a major issue!

Authorization to kill because of your thoughts is a bridge best not crossed.

Direct assault with a deadly weapon, not a perceived weapon, is the only justifiable shooting.

It's been proved repeatedly that cops thought processes are fucked up and permitting them to kill based on these "thoughts" ain't gonna cut it.

I agree with part of what you said. What if he made a 'furtive gesture' like quickly reaching into his pocket? A cop does not have to see a weapon to believe that one exists. If I were faced with someone who I had already shot with beanbags and tasers with no effect and the guy said he was armed and would not be taken alive... I am not waiting until being shot at first... HOWEVER... the man PUT HIS HANDS IN THE AIR which negates any and all use of deadly force IN THIS CASE. I'm just stating that it's not as simple as 'if they can't see a weapon then they shouldn't shoot'

The law only looks at what is known to the officer at the time, not 20/20 hindsight. The fact that no weapon was found is irrelevant to a use of force inquiry. The police believed he was armed because of his actions and his words. Still does not justify shooting a man with his hands up, though.
 
I agree with part of what you said. What if he made a 'furtive gesture' like quickly reaching into his pocket? A cop does not have to see a weapon to believe that one exists. If I were faced with someone who I had already shot with beanbags and tasers with no effect and the guy said he was armed and would not be taken alive... I am not waiting until being shot at first... HOWEVER... the man PUT HIS HANDS IN THE AIR which negates any and all use of deadly force IN THIS CASE. I'm just stating that it's not as simple as 'if they can't see a weapon then they shouldn't shoot'

The law only looks at what is known to the officer at the time, not 20/20 hindsight. The fact that no weapon was found is irrelevant to a use of force inquiry. The police believed he was armed because of his actions and his words. Still does not justify shooting a man with his hands up, though.

"The law" is wrong and too lenient in the matter of cop shootings.

The "Just-Us" system from which "the law" stems is flawed and no longer resembles the justice system this country was founded on.

Honor has been replaced with lies and deceit and there's no way for the average man to know which type of cop he's coming in contact with.

The answer isn't to give cops more leeway, the answer is to restrict their use of force even more.

When that weapon is drawn a camera must be activated and then the shooting must be reviewed by citizens who have no affiliation to any branch of the "Just-Us" system or the cop is assumed guilty of murder.
 
This was not a good shoot. Former DPS and Scottsdale Police Officer Jess Torrez explained why deadly force is not justified and he is correct.... look at the hands.

However, the guy said he had a gun and would not be taken alive... he wanted them to shoot him. Let's not pretend the cops just executed him for no reason... they thought he was armed and dangerous.

Mundanes that shoot people they "think" are armed and dangerous get murder charges thrown at them. Cops not so much.

A homeowner said he shot a 14-year-old boy because he thought the teen was trying to break into his house. But police said the teen was unarmed and did not pose an "imminent threat" when he was shot early Friday and have charged the owner with attempted second-degree murder.

Landry told police that he approached the boy from his front yard, near his vehicle. As he grew closer, he said, the boy made a "move, as if to reach for something" -- possibly a weapon -- so Landry shot him, the warrant states.

http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2013/07/marigny_homeowner_shooting.html
 
Right here is a major issue!

Authorization to kill because of your thoughts is a bridge best not crossed.

But it wasn't just thoughts! It was "feelings," too! So that means it's twice as okay ...

"A deputy felt the suspect was reaching for the gun he reportedly had, so he then fired two rounds."

As long as a police officer "thinks" and/or "feels" something, the actual facts of the matter are completely irrelevant.
 
amadou diallo - dead
life goes on after an Elio dies. Theres more than enough heads of chattle.
 
Back
Top