cubical
Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
- Messages
- 2,361
Monthly urine tests should be near enough to cover most people. I think the $$ saved would outweigh the costs.
No, I am saying the government could start requiring a lot more of its people in payment for the "protection", healthcare or other handouts it provides. They could be testing your blood every month for the fat content or requiring you to buy government endorsed cars for safety "standards". The subsidy simply shouldn't be there in the first place and if the government feels it can regulate how someone lives before it gives the subsidy, then they can start classifying a lot of things as subsidies.